Skip to main content
  • 261 Accesses

Abstract

When used in a responsible manner, typology seeks to understand the unique attributes of every person and, in the process, to foster tolerance and communication among disparate individuals and cultures. My introduction of archetypal-motivational typology (AMT) stems from a desire to further these values and aims. As the term “archetypal” implies, AMT is based on Jung’s conception of the unconscious as composed of a personal and transpersonal level. In Jung’s view, archetypes are psychological configurations analogous to the physiological instincts, or “natural incentives,” to use a contemporary euphemism, and, therefore, common to all human beings.1 Consequently, by identifying a number of basic attributes of the archetypal psyche, it is possible to develop a typology that applies across a broad spectrum of human attitudes and behavior. I focus on the archetypes of Power, Eros, Pneuma and Physis, because these are fundamental ways that all human beings interact with the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. David C. McClelland, Human Motivation, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1987, p. 590. McClelland’s studies of motivation are used widely in the field of organizational behavior for identifying successful managers, leaders and entrepreneurs. He describes four motive systems: achievement motives, power motives, affiliative motives and avoidance motives. Based on the “scoring of hundreds of pages of fiction, children’s textbooks, and hymns throughout the history of the United States,” the evidence indicates that power and affiliation-related thoughts are more common and frequent than achievement-related thoughts (Human Motivation, p. 602.) The conclusion supports my choice of Power and Eros as two basic archetypal motivations.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2012 V. Walter Odajnyk

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Odajnyk, V.W. (2012). Conclusion. In: Archetype and Character. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137008886_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics