Abstract
In 1976, Del Martin published Battered Wives, the first book devoted to the subject of men’s violence against female intimate partners in the United States. Martin observed that: The news media have often treated wife-abuse as a bizarre and relatively rare phenomenon - as occasional fodder for sensa- tionalistic reporting - but rarely as a social issue worthy of thorough investigation’ (1981: 15). While many of the underlying cultural issues Martin described in 1976 are still relevant, there has been a sea change in hegemonic discourses on men’s violence against women. Opposition to men’s violence against female intimate partners has become politically popular in the United States. One of the most visible symbols of this marked social change is the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA). VAWA is a federal law which has enjoyed broad-based support since its passage in 1994. VAWA has been refined and expanded with each subsequent reauthorisation. The United States Department of Justice website describes it this way: In 1994, the U.S. Congress enacted the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), a comprehensive legislative package focused on violence against women. VAWA recognised the devastating consequences that violence has on women, families, and society as a whole. VAWA also acknowledged that violence against women requires specialised responses to address unique barriers that prevent victims from seeking assistance from the justice system. (United States Department of Justice, n.d.: para. 4) This excerpt highlights the now-dominant conceptualisation of violence against women as an important and gendered social problem requiring collective action.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Chesney-Lind, M. (2006) ‘Patriarchy, Crime and Justice: Feminist Criminology in an Era of Backlash’, Feminist Criminology, vol. 1(1), pp. 6–26.
Chisholm, R. (2009) Family Courts Violence Review, Canberra: Australian Government Attorney-General’s Department, http://www.ag.gov.au/Documents/Chisholm_ report.pdf, date accessed 26 April, 2012.
Collier, R. and Sheldon, S. (eds) (2006) Fathers’ Rights Activism and Law Reform in Comparative Perspective, Oxford: Hart.
Collins, PH. (2004) Black Sexual Politics: African Americans, Gender and the New Racism, New York: Routledge.
DeKeseredy, W.S. (1999) ‘Tactics of the Antifeminist Backlash Against Canadian National Woman Abuse Surveys’, Violence Against Women, vol. 5(11), pp. 1,238-57.
DeKeseredy, W.S. and Schwartz, M. (2005) Backlash and Whiplash: A Critique of Statistics Canada’s 1999 General Social Survey on Victimization,http://sisyphe.org/article.php3?id_article=1689, date accessed 20 February, 2012.
Dragiewicz, M. (2008) ‘Patriarchy Reasserted: Fathers’ Rights and Anti-VAWA Activism’, Feminist Criminology, vol. 3(2), pp. 121–44.
Dragiewicz, M. (2010) A Left Realist Approach to Antifeminist Fathers’ Rights Groups’, Crime, Law and Social Change, vol. 54(2), pp. 197–212.
Dragiewicz, M. (2011) Equality with a Vengeance: Men’s Rights Groups, Battered Women and Antifeminist Backlash, Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Dragiewicz, M. (2012) Antifeminist Backlash and Critical Criminology’, in W.S. DeKeseredy and M. Dragiewicz (eds), Routledge Handbook Of Critical Criminology. London: Routledge, pp. 280–9.
Faludi, S. (1991) Backlash: The Undeclared War Against American Women, New York: Crown.
Flood, M. (2010) ‘“Fathers’ Rights” and the Defense of Paternal Authority in Australia’, Violence Against Women, vol. 16(3), pp. 328–47.
Frye, M. (1983) Politics of Reality: Essays in Feminist Theory, Freedom, California: Crossing Press.
Girard, A. (2009) ‘Backlash or Equality? The Influence of Men’s and Women’s Rights Discourses on Domestic Violence Legislation in Ontario’, Violence Against Women, vol. 15(1), pp. 5–23.
Goodman, A. (2012) ‘Violence Against Women Act: Dem Tactic to Smear GOP as Anti-Women’, Commentary Magazine, 14 March, http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/03/15/dems-smear-gop-anti-women/, date accessed 26 April 2012.
INCITE (2003) ‘Critical Resistance-INCITE! Statement on Gender Violence and the Prisonlndustrial Complex’, Social Justice, vol. 30(3), pp. 141–51.
Kaspiew, R., Gray, M., Weston, R., Moloney, L., Hand, K., Qu, L. and the Family Law Evaluation Team (2009) Evaluation of the 2006 Family Law Reforms, Canberra: Australian Institute of Family Studies, http://www.aifs.gov.au/institute/pubs/fle/, date accessed 26 April 2012.
Kaye, M. and Tolmie, J. (1998) ‘Discoursing Dads: The Rhetorical Devices of Fathers’ Rights Groups’, Melbourne University Law Review, vol. 22, pp. 162–94.
Lodge, J. and Alexander, M. (2010) Views of Adolescents in Separated Families: A Study of Adolescents’ Experiences after the 2006 Reforms to the Family Law System, Canberra: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
Mann, R.M. (2008) ‘Men’s Rights and Feminist Advocacy in Canadian Domestic Violence Policy Arenas: Contexts, Dynamics and Outcomes of Antifeminist Backlash’, Feminist Criminology, vol. 3(1), pp. 44–75.
Martin, D. (1981) Battered Wives 2nd edn, Volcano, California: Volcano Press.
Menzies, R. (2007) ‘Virtual Backlash: Representations of Men’s “Rights” and Feminist “Wrongs” in Cyberspace’, in D.E. Chunn, S.B. Boyd and H. Lessard (eds), Reaction and Resistance: Feminism, Law, and Social Change. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, pp. 65–97.
Minaker, J.C. and Snider, L. (2006) ‘Husband Abuse: Equality with a Vengeance?’, Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue Canadienne de Criminologie et de Justice Pénale, vol. 48(5), pp. 753–80.
Schlesinger, T. (2008) ‘Equality at the Price of Justice’, NWS A Journal, vol. 20(2), pp. 27–47.
United States Department of Justice (n.d.) The Violence Against Women Act: Commemorating 15 Years of Working Together to End Violence,http://web.archive.org/web/20110205001115/http://www.ovw.usdoj.gov/vawal5.htm, date accessed 20 February 2012.
Weisman, J. (2012) ‘Violence Against Women Act Divides Senate’, The New York Times, 14 March, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/15/us/politics/violence-against-women-act-divides-senate.html, date accessed 22 March 2012.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Molly Dragiewicz
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dragiewicz, M. (2013). Tactics of Anti-feminist Backlash. In: Carrington, K., Ball, M., O’Brien, E., Tauri, J.M. (eds) Crime, Justice and Social Democracy. Critical Criminological Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137008695_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137008695_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43575-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-00869-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)