Skip to main content

The Role of Politics in Influencing the Women’s Health Agenda

  • Chapter
  • 119 Accesses

Abstract

The role of women in American politics, especially local politics, has changed dramatically in the past three decades. American women increasingly have moved into elective office holding. This participatory pattern is apparent in all political venues but is especially apparent in local politics. Despite some dramatic changes in women’s participation in politics and in leadership roles, women, who make up 52 percent of the American population, do not hold more than half of all political offices in the United States. Nevertheless, women have become important players in American politics and there are women who hold leadership positions in which they have power to affect changes in public policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • About.com, 2012. US Liberal Politics. http://usliberals.about.com/od/liberalleadership/a/Senate-Committee-Chairs-112th-Congress.htm. Accessed April 12, 2012.

  • Bachrach, Peter and Morton Baratz. 1962. “Two Faces of Power.” American Political Science Review, 56(4): 947–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, Linda. 2001. “Envisioning the Future of Feminist Leadership in Congress.” National NOW Times (Special Edition 2001), 1. http://www.now.org/nnt/special-2001/congress.html. Accessed March 17, 2009.

  • Bratton, Kathleen A. and K.L. Haynie. 1999. “Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race.” The Journal of Politics, 61(3) August: 658–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caiazza, Amy. 2002. Does Women’s Representation in Elected Office Lead to Women-Friendly Policy? Washington, DC: IWPR.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Catalyst. 2013. 2011 Catalyst Census: Fortune 500 Women Board of Directors. http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/2011-catalyst-census-fortune-500-women-board-directors. Accessed May 15, 2013.

  • Center for American Women and Politics. 2012. Women in State Legislatures. http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/levels_of_office/documents/elective.pdf. Accessed May 30, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1999. Women State Legislators: Leadership Positions and Committee Chairs 1999. http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/facts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cigler, Alan and Bert Loomis. 1998. Interest Group Politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, Margaret and Marian Lief Palley 2002. “Welfare Policy and Women’s State Legislative Leadership.” Paper presented at Annual Conference of Southern Political Science Association, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, Robert, Susan Welch and Janet Clark. 1987. Women, Elections and Representation. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deen, R. and T. Little. 1999. “Getting to the Top: Factors Influencing the Selection of Women to Positions of Leadership in State Legislatures, 1999.” State and Local Government Review, 31(2) Spring: 123–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville, Alexis. 2000. Democracy in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dovi, Suzanne. 2002. “Preferable Descriptive Representatives: Will Just Any Woman, Black or Latino Do.” American Political Science Review, 96(4): 729–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easton, David. 1953. The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science. New York: Alfred Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelb, Joyce and Marian Lief Palley. 1996. Women and Public Policies: Reassessing Gender Politics. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkesworth, Mary, Kathleen J. Casey, Krista Jenkins and Kathleen E. Kleerman. 2001. Legislating By and For Women: A Comparison of the 103rd and 104th Congresses. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for American Women and Politics, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heclo, Hugh. 1978. “Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment.” The New American Political System, edited by Anthony King, 87–124. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Women’s Policy Research (IWPR). 2004. The Status of Women in the States, 2004. Washington, DC: IWPR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1977. “Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Reponses to Token Women.” American Journal of Sociology, 82(5): 965–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, Harold. 1958. Politics: Who Gets What, When and How. New York: Meridian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, Harold and Abraham Kaplan. 1950. Power and Society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Dena, Charles Tien and Rachelle Aved. 2001. “Women and Congress: Running, Winning and Ruling.” Women and Politics, 23(1/2): 105–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelle M. Taylor- Richardson and Roseanna M. Heath. 2003. “Do Women Legislators Have Different Policy Priorities Than Their Male Colleagues? A Critical Case Test.” Women and Politics, 24(4): 77–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palley, Marian Lief. 2004. “Gender and Public Policy Decision Making in State and Local Jurisdictions.” International Area Review, 7: 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, Kathryn and Logan Dancey 2011. “Speaking for the Underrepresented in the House of Representatives: Voting Women’s Interests in a Partisan Era.” Politics and Gender, 7(4): 495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, Randall and Grace Franklin. 1987. Congress, the Bureaucracy and Public Policy, Fourth Edition. Chicago, IL: Dorsey

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Women. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • “State Sen. Elaine Richardson—Seizing a Redisricting Opportunity in Arizona,” 2002. Notes from Emily, June, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swers, Michelle. 2001. “Women and Congress: Running, Winning and Ruling,” Women and Politics, 23(1/2): 167–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Sue. 1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turow, S. 2004. “Over-60 Voters Counted in ‘04.” The News Journal. Wilmington, DE, December 29, A9.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. 2012. “United States—Age and Sex”. 2009 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates. United States Census Bureau. Retrieved April 1, 2012. http://johnsimonds.com/2005/10/19/more-on-maturing-workforce-of-the-population-over-60/. Accessed April 1, 2012.

  • Weiden, Laurel. 2002. “Institutional Sources of Representation for Women.” Journal of Politics, 64(4): 1153–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Deborah. 2012. “US Senate Committee Chairs in 112th Congress,” Religion and Ethics Newsweekly. http://usliberals.about.com/od/liberalleadership/a/Senate-Committee-Chairs-112th-Congress.htm. Accessed May 2, 2013.

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Marian Lief Palley and Howard A. Palley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Palley, M.L., Palley, H.A. (2014). The Role of Politics in Influencing the Women’s Health Agenda. In: The Politics of Women’s Health Care in the United States. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137008633_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics