Skip to main content

Collaborative Decision-Making: Mapping Group Knowledge

  • Chapter
Ready for Change?
  • 283 Accesses

Abstract

Decisions drive change and change evokes decisions, a seesaw of causality which is a hallmark of leadership. This chapter focuses on a mechanism for collaborative decision- making, for making shared, robustly defended, broadly considered decisions particularly relevant in mission critical, ambiguous and fast-changing situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further reading

  • Bryson, J., Ackermann, F., Eden, C. and Finn, C. (2004) Visible Thinking Unlocking Causal Mapping for Practical Business Results, Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. and Ackermann, F. (1998) Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management, Sage: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, A. F. (1953) Applied Imagination, New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., Eden, C. and Ackermann, F. (2009) “Mapping Causal Knowledge: How Managers Consider their Environment during Meetings”, International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 10(5–6), pp. 321–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D. and Edwards, J. S. (2005) “Building User Commitment to Knowledge Management Strategy”, Information & Management, 42(7), pp. 977–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw D., Westcombe M., Hodgkin, J. and Montibeller, G. (2004) “Problem Structuring Methods for Large Group Interventions”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(5), pp. 453–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Further reading

  • Burnstein, E. and Vinokur, A. (1975) “What a Person Thinks upon Learning that He has Chosen Differently from Others: Nice Evidence for the Persuasive Arguments Explanation of Choice Skills”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, pp. 412–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (2001) “Soft Systems Methodology”, in J. Rosenhead and J. Mingers (eds) Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited, Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 61–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., Carte, T. A., Garfield, M. J. and Haley, B. J. (1997) “Research Report: The Effectiveness of Multiple Dialogues in Electronic Brainstorming”, Information Systems Research, 8, pp. 203–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. (1995) “On Evaluating the Performance of Wide-band GDSS”, European Journal of Operational Research, 81, pp. 302–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. and Ackermann, F. (1998) Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. and Ackermann, F. (2001) “SODA – The Principles”, in J. Rosenhead and J. Mingers (eds) Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited, Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, P. N. (1998) “On Evaluating the Performance of GSS: Furthering the Debate”, European Journal of Operational Research, 107, pp. 193–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friend, J. (2001) “The Strategic Choice Approach”, in J. Rosenhead and J. Mingers (eds) Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited, Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 115–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grise, M. L. and Gallupe, R. B. (1999) “Information Overload in Face-to-face Electronic Meetings: An Integrative Complexity Approach”, Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, pp. 157–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinsonneault, A., Barki, H., Gallupe, R. B. and Hoppen, N. (1999) “Electronic Brainstorming: The Illusion of Productivity”, Information Systems Research, 10, pp. 110–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D. (2002) “Releasing the Sharing of Knowledge in Groups – Evaluating the Use of Group ‘Brainstorming’ Software”, European Conference on Knowledge Management, Dublin, Ireland. 20 pages. ISBN: 0-9540488-6-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., Ackermann, F. and Eden, C. (2003) “Sharing Knowledge in Group Problem Structuring”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(9), pp. 936–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Duncan Shaw

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shaw, D. (2012). Collaborative Decision-Making: Mapping Group Knowledge. In: Rathbone, C.L.H. (eds) Ready for Change?. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137008404_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics