Abstract
There is an increasing body of social science research and writing that explores the lives of disabled children, young people, their families and allies. Much of this in recent years has been linked to work funded by government or services with an evaluative and applied focus — although there have been some important exceptions that have taken a more holistic approach to understanding the lives of disabled children and young people (for example, Connors & Stalker, 2003; Goodley & Runswick-Cole, 2012; Shakespeare, Barnes, Priestly, Cunninghambirley, Davis & Watson, 1999). The emphasis on applied, service-orientated research has sometimes meant that less attention has been paid to the methodological aspects of research with this group of children and young people and the context in which the ‘talk’ of the research encounter is produced. Watson (2012), for example, notes that research rarely examines the interplay between disabled children’s experiences and their social setting. I have written about this elsewhere in relation to the dynamics of the interviewer/interviewee relationship (Abbott, 2012), as have many others, but less has been written in the social science literature on childhood disability about the detail of other aspects of the interactions, and notably questions about where interviews happen and who else is present.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abbott, D. (2012) ‘Other voices, other rooms: Talking to young men with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy about the transition to adulthood’, Children & Society, 26, 3, 241–250.
Abbott, D. & Carpenter, J. (2010) Becoming an adult: Transition for young men with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) (London: Muscular Dystrophy Campaign). http://www.bristol.ac.uk/norahfry/research/completed-projects/becominganadult.pdf [accessed 17 July 2012].
Beresford, B. (2012) Ethical issues and research with disabled children and young people, Presentation to 1st UK Disabled Children Research Network, University of Bristol, 16 May.
Birch, M. & Miller, T. (2000) ‘Inviting intimacy: The interview as therapeutic opportunity’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3, 3, 189–202.
Bushin, N. (2007) ‘Interviewing with children in their homes: Putting ethical principles into practice and developing flexible techniques’, Children’s Geographies, 5, 3, 235–251.
Carpenter, J. (2010) Disabled children growing up in families: Perspectives from developmental psychology and family systems theory. Presentation to ESRC Seminar Series: Researching the Lives of Disabled Children and Young People, with a Focus on Their Perspectives. Seminar 1: Theoretical Perspectives, University of Strathclyde, 29 January. http://www.strath.ac.uk/humanities/schoolofappliedsocialsciences/socialwork/esrcseminarseries/, [accessed 17 July 2012].
Connors, C. & Stalker, K. (2003) The views and experiences of disabled children and their siblings: A positive outlook (London: Jessica Kingsley).
Cree, V., Kay, H. & Tisdall, K. (2002) ‘Research with children: Sharing dilemmas’, Child and Family Social Work, 7, 1, 47–56.
Davies, H. (2008). ‘Reflexivity in research practice: Informed consent with children at school and at home’, Sociological Research Online, 13, 4, 5.
Eagle, M., Baudouin, S., Chandler, C., Giddings, D., Bullock, R. & Bushby, K. (2002) ‘Survival in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Improvements in life expectancy since 1967 and the impact of home nocturnal ventilation’, Neuromuscular Disorders, 12, 10, 926–929.
Eagle, M., Bourke, J., Bullock, R., Gibson, M., Mehtaa, J., Giddings, D., Strauba, V. & Bushby, K. (2007) ‘Managing Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: The additive effect of spinal surgery and home nocturnal ventilation in improving survival’, Neuromuscular Disorders, 17, 6, 470–475.
Gibson, B., Young, N., Upshur, R. & McKeever, P. (2007) ‘Men on the margin: A Bourdieusian examination of living into adulthood with muscular dystrophy’, Social Science and Medicine, 65, 3, 505–517.
Goodley, D. & Runswick-Cole, K. (2012) Does every child matter, post-Blair? The interconnections of disabled childhoods (Manchester: Manchester Metropolitan University). http://post-blair.posterous.com/ [accessed 18 July 2012].
Holt, L. (2010) ‘The ‘voices’ of children: De-centring empowering research relations’, Children’s Geographies, 2, 1, 13–27.
Kitzinger, C. (2004) Feminist approaches, in C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. Gubrium & D. Silverman (eds), Qualitative Research Practice (London: Sage), pp. 125–140.
Masson, J. (2000) Researching children’s perspectives: Legal issues, in A. Lewis & G. Lindsay (eds), Researching children’s perspectives (Buckingham: Open University Press), pp. 34–45.
Mayall, B. (2000) Conversations with children: Working with generational issues, in P.H. Christensen & A. James (eds), Research with children: Perspectives and practices (London: Falmer Press), pp. 120–135.
Mishna, F., Antle, B. & Regehr, C. (2004) ‘Tapping the perspectives of children: Emerging ethical issues in qualitative research’, Qualitative Social Work, 3, 4, 449–468.
Morris, J. (2003) ‘Including all children: Finding out about the experiences of children with communication and/or cognitive impairments’, Children & Society, 17, 5, 337–348.
Murray, P. & Penman, J. (eds) (1996) Let our children be: A collection of stories (Sheffield: Parents With Attitude).
Rahbeck, J., Werge, B., Madsen, A., Marquardt, J., Steffensen, B. & Jeppesen, J. (2005) ‘Adult life with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Observations among an emerging and unforeseen patient population’, Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 8, 1, 17–28.
Rogers, C.R. (1961) On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin).
Shakespeare, T., Barnes, C., Priestly, M., Cunninghambirley, S., Davis, J. & Watson, N. (1999) Life as a disabled child: A qualitative study of young people’s experiences and perspectives (Leeds: Disability Research Unit, University of Leeds).
Smart, C. (2009) ‘Shifting horizons: Reflections on qualitative methods’, Feminist Theory, 10, 3, 1–14.
Tisdall, K., Davis, J. & Gallagher, M. (2009) Research with children and young people: Research design, methods and analysis (London: Sage).
Watson, N. (2012) ‘Theorising the lives of disabled children: How can disability theory help?’, Children & Society, 26, 3, 192–202.
Woolfson, L. (2004) ‘Family well-being and disabled children: A psychosocial model of disability-related child behaviour problems’, British Journal of Health Psychology, 9, 1, 1–13.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 David Abbott
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Abbott, D. (2013). Who Says What, Where, Why and How? Doing Real-World Research with Disabled Children, Young People and Family Members. In: Curran, T., Runswick-Cole, K. (eds) Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137008220_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137008220_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43555-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-00822-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)