Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Practices of Innovation in Mobile Computing Alliances

  • Chapter
International Business

Part of the book series: The Academy of International Business ((AIB))

  • 643 Accesses

Abstract

Global technology alliances (GTAs) and innovation capabilities are the two main themes in this chapter. Drawing on innovation concepts and the resource-based view, this chapter explains how firms gain access to complementary resources, dispersed in the international realm, and incorporate these within their organizations through GTAs. This emergent form of international resource-seeking and network collaboration across borders can be seen as a new phenomenon in international business (IB) (Kogut and Zander, 1992; Rugman and D’Cruz, 2000; Yamin, 2011). Innovation capabilities can be attained by combining a firm’s technology resources with those of overseas alliance partners, offering progress towards enhancement of competitive advantage. From a theoretical aspect, we combine the resource-based view with innovation concepts, and comprehensively examine the dynamics of resources and innovation at both a firm and a network level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ABI Research (2008) Mobile Internet Devices (Oyster Bay: ABI Research).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, G. and Katila, R. (2001) ‘Technological Acquisitions and the Innovation Performance of Acquiring Firms: A Longitudinal Study’, Strategic Management Journal, 22 (3), 197–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R. and Schoemaker, Paul J. H. (1993) ‘Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent’, Strategic Management Journal, 14 (1), 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansari, S. and Garud, R. (2009) ‘Inter-Generational Transitions in Socio-Technical Systems: The Case of Mobile Communications’, Research Policy, 38 (2), 382–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ARM (2009) Enabling Innovation Creating Value: Annual Review 2008 (Cambridge: ARM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005) ‘Resolving the Capability–Rigidity Paradox in New Product Innovation’, Journal of Marketing, 69 (4), 61–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atuahene-Gima, K. and Murray, Janet Y. (2007) ‘Exploratory and Exploitative Learning in New Product Development: A Social Capital Perspective on New Technology Ventures in China’, Journal of International Marketing, 15 (2), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, Jay B. (1991) ‘Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage’, Journal of Management, 17 (1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, Jay B. and Clark, Delwyne N. (2007) Resource-Based Theory (1st edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Broughton, P. D. (2010) ‘Another Way to Develop Ideas’, Financial Times, London, 18 November 2010, p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J. and Fai, F. (1999) ‘Firms as the Source of Innovation and Growth: The Evolution of Technological Competence’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 9 (3), 331–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J. and Narula, R. (2001) ‘The Eclectic Paradigm in the Global Economy’, International Journal of Economics of Business, 8 (2), 155–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, Henry W. (2003) Open Innovation (1st edn, Boston: Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, Henry W. (2004) ‘Managing Open Innovation’, Research Technology Management, 47 (1), 23–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, Henry W. (2007) ‘Why Companies Should Have Open Business Models’, MIT Sloan Management Review, 48 (2), 22–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, Henry W. and Appleyard, Melissa M. (2007) ‘Open Innovation and Strategy’, California Management Review, 50 (1), 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, C. J. and Lee, S. H. (1997) ‘A Knowledge-Based View of Cooperative Relationships’ in Beamish, Paul W. and Killing, J. Peter (eds), Cooperative Strategies (San Francisco: The New Lexington Press), 33–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, Iain M., Henderson, Rebecca M. and Stern, S. (2000) ‘Untangling the Origins of Competitive Advantage’, Strategic Management Journal, 21 (10–11), 1123–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Weseley M. and Levinthal, Daniel A. (1990) ‘Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), 125–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Robert G. (2001) Winning at New Products (3rd edn, New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlander, L. and Gann, David M. (2010) ‘How Open Is Innovation?’, Research Policy, 39 (6), 699–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, E. (2002) ‘The Dynamics of Product Innovation and Firm Competences’, Strategic Management Journal, 23 (12), 1095–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, George S. (1994) ‘The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations’, Journal of Marketing, 58 (4), 37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Yves L. (1988) ‘Technology Partnerships between Larger and Smaller Firms: Some Critical Issues’ in Contractor, Farok J. and Lorange, P. (eds), Cooperative Strategies in International Business (Lexington: Lexington Books), 317–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, Jeffrey H. and Singh, H. (1998) ‘The Relation View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of International Competitive Advantage’, Academy of Management Review, 23 (4), 660–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. and Martin, Jeffrey A. (2000) ‘Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They?’, Strategic Management Journal, 21 (10/11), 1105–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. and Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996) ‘Resource-Based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects inEntrepreneurial Firms’, Organization Science, 7 (2), 136–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ethiraj, Sendil K., Kale, P., Krishnan, M. S., and Singh, Jitendra V. (2005) ‘Where Do Capabilities Come from and How Do They Matter? A Study in the Software Services Industry’, Strategic Management Journal, 26 (1), 25–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, Jay R. (1982) ‘Designing the Innovating Organization’, Organizational Dynamics, 10 (3), 4–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gittelman, M. and Kogut, B. (2003) ‘Does Good Science Lead to Valuable Knowledge? Biotechnology Firms and the Evolutionary Logic of Citation Patterns’, Management Science, 49 (4), 366–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaister, Keith W. and Buckley, Peter J. (1996) ‘Strategic Motives for International Alliance Formation’, Journal of Management Studies, 33 (3), 301–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffin, K. and Mitchell, R. (2005) Innovation Management (1st edn, New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Robert M. and Baden-Fuller, C. (2004) ‘A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances’, Journal of Management Studies, 41 (1), 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. and Singh, H. (1998) ‘The Architecture of Cooperation: Managing Coordination Costs and Appropriation Concerns in Strategic Alliances’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 781–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J. (1993) ‘Understanding the Rationale of Strategic Technology Partnering: International Mode of Cooperation and Sectoral Differences’, Strategic Management Journal, 14 (5), 371–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J. and Narula, R. (1996) ‘Choosing Organizational Modes of Strategic Technology Partnering: International and Sectoral Differences’, Journal of International Business Studies, 27 (2), 265–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C. K. (1991) ‘Corporate Imagination and Expeditionary Marketing’, Harvard Business Review, 69 (4), 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Jeffrey S., Hitt, Michael A., Hoskisson, Robert E. and Ireland, R. Duane (2001) ‘Resource Complementarity in Business Combinations: Extending the Logic to Organizational Alliances’, Journal of Management, 27, 679–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedlund, G. and Rolander, D. (1990) ‘Actions in Heterarchies: New Approaches to Managing MNC’ in Bartlett, Christopher A., Doz, Yves and Hedlund, Gunnar (eds), Managing the Global Firm (1st edn, New York: Routledge), 15–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, J. (2006) ‘Selective Revealing in Open Innovation Processes: The Case of Embedded Linux’, Research Policy, 35 (7), 953–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Charles W. L. and Rothaermel, Frank T. (2003) ‘The Performance of Incumbent Firms in the Face of Radical Technological Innovation’, Academy of Management Review, 28 (2), 257–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, Michael A., Dacin, M. Tina, Levitas, E., Arregle, J. L. and Borza, A. (2000) ‘Partner Selection in Emerging and Developed Market Contexts: Resource-Based and Organizational Learning Perspectives’, Academy of Management Journal, 43 (3), 449–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoetker, G. and Mellewigt, T. (2009) ‘Choice and Performance of Governance Mechanisms: Matching Alliance Governance to Asset Type’, Strategic Management Journal, 30 (10), 1025–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, Andrew C. (2000) ‘Learning through Joint Ventures: A Framework of Knowledge Acquisition’, Journal of Management Studies, 37 (7), 1019–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intel (2009) Mobility’s Next Wave of Growth (Sunnyvale: Intel Corp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B., Kohli, Ajay K. and Sahay, A. (2000) ‘Market-Driven Versus Driving Markets’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (1), 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J. and Mattsson, L.-G. (1987) ‘Interorganizational Relations in Industrial Systems: A Network Approach Compared with the Transaction-Cost Approach’, International Studies of Management & Organization, 17 (1), 34–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J. E. (2009) ‘The Uppsala Internationalization Process Model Revisited: From Liability of Foreignness to Liability of Outsidership’, Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (9), 1411–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafouros, Mario I., Buckley, Peter J., Sharp, John A. and Wang, C. (2008) ‘The Role of Internationalization in Explaining Innovation Performance’, Technovation, 28 (1–2), 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P., Singh, H., and Perlumutter, H. (2000) ‘Learning and Protection of Proprietary Assets in Strategic Alliances: Building Relational Capital’, Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3), 217–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1992) ‘Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology’, Organization Science, 3 (3), 383–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1993) ‘Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation’, Journal of International Business Studies, 24 (4), 625–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1996) ‘What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning’, Organization Science, 7 (5), 502–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotabe, M., Srinivasan, Srini S. and Aulakh, Preet S. (2002) ‘Multinationality and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of R & D and Marketing Capabilities’, Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (1), 79–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotabe, M. and Swan, K. Scott (1995), ‘The Role of Strategic Alliances in High-Technology New Product Development,’ Strategic Management Journal, 16 (8), 621–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, Hull Peer (2010) ‘Transformative Dynamics of Innovation and Industry: New Roles for Employees?’, Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 16 (2), 171–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambe, C. Jay, Spekman, Robert E. and Hunt, Shelby D. (2002) ‘Alliance Competence, Resources, and Alliance Success: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Initial Test’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30 (2), 141–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, K. and Salter, A. (2006) ‘Open for Innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance among U.K. Manufacturing Firms’, Strategic Management Journal, 27 (2), 131–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, D. (2006) ‘The Competitive Advantage of Interconnected Firms: An Extension of the Resource-Based View’, Academy of Management Review, 31 (3), 638–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D. (1988) ‘Implementation as Mutual Adaptation of Technology and Organization’, Research Policy, 17 (5), 251–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler, E. (2005) ‘Corporate Diversification: Identifying New Businesses Systematically in the Diversified Firm’, Technovation, 25 (7), 697–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler, U. (2008) ‘Integrated Roadmaps for Open Innovation’, Research Technology Management, 51 (3), 45–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorange, P. and Roos, J. (1993), Strategic Alliances (1st edn, Cambridge: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Yadong (2000) ‘Dynamic Capabilities in International Expansion’, Journal of World Business, 35 (4), 355–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhok, A. (2002) ‘Reassessing the Fundamentals and Beyond: Ronald Coase, the Transaction Cost and Resource-Based Theories of the Firm and the Institutional Structure of Production’, Strategic Management Journal, 23, 535–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makhija, M. (2003) ‘Comparing the Resource-Based and Market-Based Views of the Firm: Empirical Evidence from Czech Privitation’, Strategic Management Journal, 24, 433–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, James G. (1991) ‘Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning’, Organization Science, 2 (1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J. (2006) ‘Dragon Multinationals: New Players in 21st Century Globalization’, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23 (1), 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen Jr, William W., Swamidass, Paul M. and Teng, B. (2008) ‘Strategic Alliance Termination and Performance: The Role of Task Complexity, Nationality, and Experience’, The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 18 (2), 191–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. G. (2001) ‘Exploratory Learning, Innovative Capacity, and Managerial Oversight’, Academy of Management Journal, 44 (1), 118–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, S. and Boden, M. (1992) ‘Evolutionary Epistemology and the Nature of Technology Strategy’ in Coombs, Joseph, Saviotti, Paolo and Walsh, Vivien (eds), Technological Change and Company Strategies (London: Academic Press), 49–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miozzo, M. and Grimshaw, D. (2005) ‘Modularity and Innovation in Knowledge-Intensive Business Services: IT Outsourcing in Germany and the UK’, Research Policy, 34 (9), 1419–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. and Singh, K. (1996)‘Survival of Businesses Using Collaborative Relationships to Commercialize Complex Goods’, Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 169–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, R. (2007) ‘Offshoring: Economic Geography and the Multinational Firm’, Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (1), 206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narula, R. and Hagedoorn, J. (1999) ‘Innovating through Strategic Alliances: Moving towards International Partnerships and Contractual Agreements’, Technovation, 19 (5), 283–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995) The Knowledge-Creating Company (1st edn, New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmae, K. (1989) ‘The Global Logic of Strategic Alliances’, Harvard Business Review, 67 (2), 143–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1997) ‘Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Combining Institutional and Resource-Based Views’, Strategic Management Journal, 18 (9), 697–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, Richard N. and Baughn, C. Christopher (1990) ‘Forms of Interorganizational Governance for Multinational Alliances’, Academy of Management Journal, 33 (3), 503–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxley, Joanne E. and Sampson, Rachelle C. (2004) ‘The Scope and Governance of International R & D Alliances’, Strategic Management Journal, 25 (8/9), 723–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, Joel M. (1994) ‘Market Uncertainty and the Social Character of Economic Exchange’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39 (3), 458–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael E. (2004) Competitive Advantage (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Walter W., Koput, Kenneth W. and Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) ‘Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (1), 116–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. and Hamel, G. (1990) ‘The Core Competence of the Corporation’, Harvard Business Review, 68 (3), 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richey, R. Glenn, Daugherty, Patricia J. and Roath, Anthony S. (2007) ‘Firm Technological Readiness and Complementarity: Capabilities Impacting Logistics Service Competency and Performance’, Journal of Business Logistics, 28 (1), 195–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothaermel, Frank T. and Deeds, David L. (2004) ‘Exploration and Exploitation Alliances in Biotechnology: A System of New Product Development’, Strategic Management Journal, 25 (3), 201–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothaermel, Frank T. and Deeds, David L. (2006) ‘Alliance Type, Alliance Experience and Alliance Management Capability in High-Technology Ventures’, Journal of Business Venturing, 21 (4), 429–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, Alan M. and D’Cruz, Joseph R. (2000) Multinationals as Flagship Firms: Regional Business Networks (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C. and Varian, Hal R. (1999) Information Rule (Boston: Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharon, P. Hall and Anderson, E. (2009) ‘Operating Systems for Mobile Computing’, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 25 (2), 64–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinkovics, Rudolf R., Jean, R. -J., Roath, Anthony S., and Cavusgil, S. Tamer (2011) ‘Does IT Integration Really Enhance Supplier Responsiveness in Global Supply Chains?’, Management International Review, 51 (2), 193–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, M., Droge, C., Hanvanich, S. and Calantone, R. (2005) ‘Marketing and Technology Resource Complementarity: An Analysis of Their Interaction Effect in Two Environmental Contexts’, Strategic Management Journal, 26 (3), 259–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, R., Lilien, Gary L. and Rangaswamy, A. (2002) ‘Technological Opportunism and Radical Technology Adoption: An Application to E-Business’, Journal of Marketing, 66 (3), 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stallman, Richard M. (1999) ‘The Gnu Operating System and the Free Software Movement’ in DiBona, C., Ockman, S. and Stone, M. (eds), Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution (Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly), 53–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, Toby E. (2000) ‘Internationalization Alliance and the Performance of Firms: A Study of Growth and Innovation Rates in a High-Technology Industry’, Strategic Management Journal, 21 (8), 791–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan, V. and Moorman, C. (2009) ‘Marketing Alliance, Firm Networks, and Firm Value Creation’, Journal of Marketing, 73 (5), 52–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, David J. (1996) ‘Firm Organization, Industrial Structure, and Technological Innovation’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 31 (6), 193–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, David J., Pisano, Gary P. and Shuen, A. (1997) ‘Dynamic Capability and Strategic Management’, Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7), 509–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, Rajan, P. and Cunningham, Margaret H. (1995) ‘Strategic Alliances: A Synthesis of Conceptual Foundations’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23 (4), 282–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, A. (2003) ‘The Evolution View of the MNE and the Future of Internationalization Theory’, Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (6), 498–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, R. (6 January 2011) ‘Microsoft Needs to Rethink Tablets’, Financial Times, London, available at.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver E. (1971) ‘The Vertical Integration of Production: Market Failure Considerations’, The American Economic Review, 61 (2), 112–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver E. (1979) ‘Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations’, Journal of Law and Economics, 22 (2), 233–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalcinkaya, G., Calantone, Roger J. and Griffith, David A. (2007) ‘An Examination of Exploration and Exploitation Capabilities: Implications for Product Innovation and Market Performance’, Journal of International Marketing, 15 (4), 63–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamin, M. (2011) ‘A Commentary on Peter Buckley’s Writings on the Global Factory’, Management International Review, 51 (2), 285–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, Shaker A., Ireland, R. Duane and Hitt, Michael A. (2000) ‘International Expansion by New Venture Firms: International Diversity, Mode of Market Entry, Technological Learning, and Performance’, Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5), 925–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Yong Kyu Lew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rudolf R. Sinkovics
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Edinburgh Business School, UK

    Simon Harris  & Veselina Stoyanova  & 

  2. Lappeenranta University of Technology, Finland

    Olli Kuivalainen

Copyright information

© 2012 Yong Kyu Lew and Rudolf R. Sinkovics

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lew, Y.K., Sinkovics, R.R. (2012). Practices of Innovation in Mobile Computing Alliances. In: Harris, S., Kuivalainen, O., Stoyanova, V. (eds) International Business. The Academy of International Business. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137007742_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation