Skip to main content

Rethinking Schools and Society/ Combating Neoliberal Globalization

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Marxism and Education ((MAED))

Abstract

Over the last several decades, neoliberalism has been presented as a necessary and inevitable outcome of globalization and, therefore, has shaped social, economic, and educational policies. However, neoliberalism or free-market capitalism neither achieves the economic and social benefits claimed for it nor functions as a self-regulating system. Instead, neoliberalism, as the current global recession makes abundantly clear, has devastated global economies and wrecked havoc on the environment. Therefore, I will argue the following:

  • Over the last several decades, beginning with Margaret Thatcher in Britain and Ronald Reagan in the United States, politicians, and the corporate and media elite have hijacked the process of globalization (the shrinkage of space and time) to promote neoliberalism as the only way in which the world can be organized. Neoliberalism promises to increase economic growth and reduce poverty and inequality. Consequently, neoliberalism, with its emphasis on privatization, deregulation, competition, and the dismantling of welfare and education programs except in the service of capital, has come to dominate the decision-making process.

  • Education, from preschool through the post-secondary level, is increasingly reshaped into competitive markets where students are to be assessed via standardized tests with the goal of creating entrepreneurial individuals who will be economically productive members of society, responsible only for her or him self. Neoliberal societies aim to create instrumentally rational individuals who can compete in the marketplace (Peters 1994)

  • However, neoliberalism in practice differs from neoliberals’ theoretical assertions. Instead, writes Harvey (2005), neoliberalism is

a benevolent mask of wonderful-sounding words like freedom, liberty, choice, and rights, [that] hide the grim realities of the restoration or reconstitution of naked class power, locally as well as transnationally, but more particularly in the main financial centers of global capitalism. (Harvey 2005, 119)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander, F. King. 1998. “Private Institutions and Public Dollars: An Analysis of the Effects of Federal Direct Student Aid on Public and Private Institutions of Higher Education.” Journal of Educational Finance 23(3): 390–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anyon, Jean. 2005. Radical Possibilities: Public Policy, Urban Education, and a New Social Movement. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bello, Walden. 2005. Dilemmas of Domination: The Unmaking of the American Empire. New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, Thomas. 1999. The Great Work. New York: Bell Tower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1998. Act of Resistance: Against the Tyranny of the Market. New York: The New Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, Neil and Nicholas Theodore. 2000. “Cities and the Geographies of ‘Actually Existing Neoliberalism.’” In Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe, edited by Neil Brenner and Nicholas Theodore. Oxford: Blackwell, 2–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Mike. 2005. Planet of Slums. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Thomas. 1999. The Lexus and the Olive Tree. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2005). The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, James. 2006. New York Review of Books, 53(1) (January 12): 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (2008). “The Right to the City.” New Left Review 53 (September/ October): 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursh, David, 2007a. “Exacerbating Inequality: The Failed Promise of the No Child Left Behind Act,” Race, Ethnicity and Education 10(3), 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, (2007b). “Assessing No Child Left Behind and the Rise of Neoliberal Policies.” American Educational Research Journal 44(3) (September): 493–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, (2008). High-Stakes Testing and the Decline of Teaching and Learning: The Real Crisis in Education. Latham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursh, David, Camille A. Martina, and Michael Fantauzzo. 2009. “Toxins in Our Environment: Health and Civic Responsibility” in Social Studies and Diversity Teacher Education: What We Do and Why We Do It, edited by E. Heilman. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jomo. K.S. and Jacques Baudot. 2007. Preface in Flat World, Big Gaps: Economic Liberalization, Globalization, Poverty, and Inequality, edited by Jomo K.S. and Jacques Baudot, New York: Zed Books, xvii–xxvii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, Paul. 2009. The Return of Depression Economics and the Crisis of 2008. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, Hilga, Eric S. Sheppard, Kristin Sziarto and Anant Maringanti. 2007. “Contesting Urban Futures: Decentering Neoliberalism” in Contesting Neoliberalism: Urban Frontiers edited by H. Leitner; E. S. Sheppard and J. Peck. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, P. 2004. High Stakes Education: Inequality, Globalization, and Urban School Reform. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McKibben, Bill. 2006. “The Coming Meltdown.” New York Review of Books53(1) (January 12):16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (2007). Deep Economy: The Wealth of Communities and the Durable Tuture. New York: Times Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, Pila. 2007. “Academic Capitalism and Doctoral Student Socialization: A Case Study.” The Review of Higher Education, 78(1): 71–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S. L., and D.C. Berliner. 2005. “The Inevitable Corruption of Indicators and Educators Through High-Stakes Testing.” Education Policy Studies Laboratory. Accessed on April 23, 2009 at http://greatlakescenter.org/docs/early_research/g_1_new_doc/EPSL-0503–101-EPRU.pdf.

  • Orfield, Gary. 2006. Forward. Tracking Achievement Gaps and Assessing the Impact of NCLB on the Gaps: An In-Depth Look into National and State Reading and Math Outcome Trends. Boston, MA: The Civil Rights Project of Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, David. 1994. Earth in Mind. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, David. 2002. The Nature of Design: Ecology, Culture and Human Intention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Michael. 1994. “Individualism and Community: Education and the Politics of Difference.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. 14(2) (June): 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollan, M. 2006. The Omnivore’s Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2008a. In Defense of Food: An Eater’s Manifestob. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2008b. “An Open Letter to the Farmer in Chief.” New York Times Magazine. (October 12): MM62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, Sheila and Larry Leslie. 1997. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, Sheila and Gary Rhoades. 2004. Academic Capitalism and the New Economy: Politics, Markets, State and Higher Education. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steger, Manfred. 2005. Globalism: Market Ideology Meets Terrorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Education. 2006. Overview: NCLB is Working. Washington, DC. Accessed on March 3, 2009 at http://www2.ed.gov /nclb/overview/importance/nclbworking.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemsky, Robert; Gregory R. Wegner and William F. Massy. 2006. Remaking the American University: Market-Smart and Mission-Centered. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Ravi Kumar

Copyright information

© 2012 Ravi Kumar

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hursh, D. (2012). Rethinking Schools and Society/ Combating Neoliberal Globalization. In: Kumar, R. (eds) Education and the Reproduction of Capital. Marxism and Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137007582_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics