Abstract
Let me assume two burdens in this concluding chapter. Let me sum up parallels across the three case studies to show why ritual is indispensable to their operation and why sampling and coding texts cannot be repaired for the rubric of science. As the second burden, let me retrieve an alternative research tradition by which cultural investigators may capture focal meanings. Mary Poovey astutely diagnosed the perversities in reifying “facts,” but her postmodern acknowledgment of interlocking theory as “the only source of meaning” justifiably worries archivetethered humanists in an era of scholarship “after the fact:’ The unappreciated critical edge of Max Weber’s ideal-type approach offers a remedy.
What the signs conceal, their application declares.
—Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Mary Poovey, A History of the Modern Fact (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998), pp. 327–328;
Clifford Geertz, After the Fact (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995).
T. Lewens, “Realism and the Strong Program,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (2005): 573.
Giorgio Agamben, The End of the Poem. Studies in Poetics (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999), p. 30;
Cleanth Brooks, Historical Evidence and the Reading of Seventeenth-Century Poetry (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1991), pp. 156–159;
Paul de Man, The Rhetoric of Romanticism (Columbia: Columbia University Press, 1984), pp. 313–314.
Anthony Grafton, The Footnote. A Curious History (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997), pp. 19–22, 234.
Paul de Man, Allegories of Reading (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979);
Cleanth Brooks, The Well Wrought Urn: Studies in the Structure of Poetry (London: Dobson, 1968).
John Evans, “Two Worlds in Cultural Sociology,” in Meaning and Method, ed. Jeffrey Alexander and Isaac Reed (Boulder: Paradigm, 2009), p. 209.
Ronald Grimes, “Victor Turner’s Definition, Theory, and Sense of Ritual,” in Victor Turner and the Construction of Cultural Criticism, ed. Kathleen Ashley (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990), p. 142;
Max Scharnberg, The Non-Authentic Nature of Freud’s Observations (Uppsala: Uppsala University, 1993), vol. 2, p. 203.
Roy Sorensen, Vagueness and Contradiction (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001), p. 138.
Lorraine Daston and Peter Galison, Objectivity (New York: Zone Books, 2007), pp. 290–293, 301–302.
Norman Denzin, “Reading Cultural Texts: Comment on Griswold,” American Journal of Sociology 95 (1990): 1577–1580.
For a twin reference to “the meaning of the cultural object as constituted by the object itself,” see Wendy Griswold, “A Methodological Framework for the Sociology of Culture,” Sociological Methodology 17 (1987): 5.
Claude Lévi-Strauss, The Savage Mind (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966), pp. 18–19, 204–210, 268.
Claude Lévi-Strauss, The Way of Masks (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1979), pp. 8, 219–220.
Roy Rappaport, Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), p. 71.
Paul de Man, Allegories of Reading (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979), p. 11.
Maurice Georges Barrier, L’art du récit dans l’étranger d’Albert Camus (Paris: A.G. Nizet, 1962), p. 54.
Derek Phillips, Knowledge From What? Theories and Methods in Social Research (Chicago: Rand McNally and Co., 1971), pp. 18–19.
Abraham Kaplan, The Conduct of Inquiry. Methodology for Behavioral Science (New York: Crowell, 1964), p. 75.
David Altheide and John M. Johnson, “Criteria for Assessing Interpretive Validity in Qualitative Research,” in Handbook of Qualitative Research, ed. Norman Denzin and Yvonna Lincoln (Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 1994), p. 496.
In discussing the validity of coding categories, Irving Janis elucidated primarily the criterion of “productivity,” namely, interesting correlations of codes with codes. Irving Janis, “The Problem of Validating Content Analysis,” in Language of Politics, ed. Harold Lasswell and Nathan Leiter (New York: George Stewart, 1949), pp. 60–81.
Wendy Griswold, “Provisional, Provincial Positivism: Reply to Denzin,” American Journal of Sociology 95 (1990): 1582.
Doug Arnold, Louisa Sadler, and Aline Villavicencio, “Portuguese: Corpora, Coordination, and Agreement,” in Roots. Linguistics in Search of Its Evidential Base, ed. Sam Featherston and Wolfgang Sternefeld (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2007), pp. 25, 27; Richard Biernacki, “The Banality of Misrepresentation,” in Reed and Alexander, Meaning and Method, p. 260.
Mark Rowlands, “Situated Representation,” in The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition, ed. Phillip Robbins and Murat Aydede (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 117–133.
Paul Roth, Meaning and Method in the Social Sciences (Ithaca: Cornel University Press, 1987), p. 143.
Max Black, “Some Puzzles About Meaning,” in Human Communication: Theoretical Explorations, ed. Albert Silverstein (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1974), pp. 87–93.
James Bohman, New Philosophy of Social Science (Cambridge, MA; MIT Press, 1993), p. 123.
Cosma Shalizi, “Graphs, Trees, Materialism, Fishing,” in Reading Graphs, Maps, Trees, ed. Jonathan Goodwin and John Holbo (Anderson, SC: Parlor Press, 2011), p. 121;
Barrington Moore, Jr., Political Power and Social Theory (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1958), p. 132.
Roberto Calasso, Literature and the Gods (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2001), pp. 176–180.
Andrew Bowie, From Romanticism to Critical Theory (London: Routledge, 1996), p. 71.
E. D. Hirsch, The Aims of Interpretation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976), p. 134.
E. D. Hirsch, The Aims of Interpretation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976), p. 134.
The tweed example follows Nelson Goodman, Languages of Art (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1976).
Roger Chartier, “Text, Symbols, and Frenchness,” Journal of Modern History 57 (1985): 682–695.
Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientifzc Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996), pp. 141–143;
Paul de Man, Allegories of Reading (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979), pp. 11–13.
Geoffrey Hawthorn, Plausible Worlds (Cambridge University Press, 1991), p. 124. On earnest philosophy switched into comedy,
see Olga Russel, Humor in Pascal (North Qunicy: Christopher Publishing, 1977), pp. 161–162.
Opposing but seemingly equally adequate interpretations of objects create incompatible universes. Nelson Goodman, Ways of Worldmaking (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1978), pp. 114–116.
Harold Sampson and Joseph Weiss, “Our Research Approach,” in The Psychoanalytic Approach. Theory, Clinical Observations, and Empirical Research, ed. Joseph Weiss, Harold Sampson, and the Mount Zion Psychotherapy Research Group (New York: The Guilford Press, 1986), p. 151.
Additionally, consider the excisions by Markoff and Shapiro of irregular, potentially revelatory documents. Gilbert Shapiro and John Markoff, Revolutionary Demands (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998), pp. 224–230.
The interdependencies between text-like artifacts run across media (literature versus film) and may be governed by relations between subordinate and among dominant social groups. William Sewell, Jr., “The Concept(s) of Culture,” in Beyond the Cultural Turn, ed. Victoria Bonnell and Lynn Hunt (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999), pp. 35–61.
Shyon Baumann, Hollywood Highbrow. From Entertainment to Art (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007).
Arnie Berstein, “The Movies Are.” Carl Sandburg’s Film Reviews and Essays, 1920–1928 (Chicago: Lake Claremont Press, 2000), p. 1; my emphasis.
On nonexistence of cultural “units,” see Catherine Gallagher and Stephen Greenblatt, Practicing New Historicism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), p. 14.
Anna Everett, “Inside the Dark Museum; A Genealogy of Black Film Criticism. 1909–1949,” PhD dissertation, University of Southern California, 1996, vol. 1, pp. 311–312.
Pascal Manuel Heu, ‘Le Temps’ du cinéma. Emile Vuillermoz. Père de la critique cinéma. 1910–1930 (Paris: L’Harmattan, 2003), pp. 93–104.
Nassim Nicholas Taleb, The Black Swan. The Impact of the Highly Improbable (New York: Random House, 2007).
Eric Slauter, The State as a Work of Art (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009), p. 350.
Susan Neiman, Evil in Modern Thought. An Alternative History of Philosophy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002), pp. 271–277;
Hannah Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem. A Report on the Banality of Evil (New York: Penguin Books, 1994), p. 252;
Timothy Clark, The Poetics of Singularity (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2005), p. 34.
Giorgio Agamben, Homo Sacer. Sovereign Power and Bare Life (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998), p. 166;
Michel Foucault, ed., I, Pierre Rivière, Having Slaughtered My Mother, My Sister, and My Brother… : A Case of Parricide in the 19th Century (New York: Pantheon Books, 1975); and the masters discussed in Gallagher and Greenblatt, PracticingNew Historicism, pp. 49–74.
At the extreme, Jacques Derrida, Of Grammatology (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1976), p. 168. Or, from an author less suspect: Moore, Political Powerand Social Theory, p. 141.
Douglas Medin and Robert Goldstone, “The Predicates of Similarity,” in Similarity in Language, Thought, and Perception, ed. Christina Cacciari (Turnhout: Brepols, 1995), pp. 83–110.
Giovanni Sartori, Concepts and Method in Social Science (New York: Routledge, 2009), pp. 97–150; Moore, Political Power and Social Theory, p. 151.
Edith Grossman, Why Translation Matters (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2010), p. 76.
W. I. Carr, “The West Indian Novelist,” in Consequences of Class and Color, ed. David Lowenthal and Lambros Comitas (Garden City, NY: Anchor, 1973), p. 286.
Dedre Gentner and Arthur Markman, “Similarity is Like Analogy: Structural Alignment in Comparison,” in Similarity in Language, Thought, and Perception, ed. Christina Cacciari (Turnhout: Brepols, 1995), pp. 111–137.
Cleanth Brooks, The Well Wrought Urn (London: Dennis Dobson, 1968), p. 159.
Claude Lévi-Strauss, Structural Anthropology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976), vol. 2, pp. 242–256;
Claude Lévi-Strauss, The Jealous Potter (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1988), pp. 25–29, 184.
Lawrence Prelli, A Rhetoric of Science: Inventing Scientific Discourse (Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1989), p. 149.
Marcello Pera, The Discourses of Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994), pp. 131–132.
Richard Biernacki, “Rationalization Processes Inside Cultural Sociology,” in The Oxford Handbook of Cultural Sociology, ed. Jeffrey Alexander, Ronald Jacobs, and Philip Smith (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 46–69.
Erving Goffman, Frame Analysis (Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1986), p. 562.
Zygmunt Baumann, Society under Siege (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002), p. 44;
Zygmunt Baumann, “Durkheim’s Society Revisited,” in The Cambridge Companion to Durkheim, ed. Jeffrey Alexander and Philip Smith (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), pp. 360–382.
Ulrich Beck, “The Cosmopolitan Turn,” in The Future of Social Theory, ed. Nicholas Gane (London; Continuum, 2004), pp. 154–155.
Mauro Guillen, Models of Management. Work, Authority and Organization in a Comparative Perspective (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994), p. 306. Guillen shines by listing each sample source.
Roy Rappaport, Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity (Cambridge University Press, 1999), p. 230.
Brent Berlin and Paul Kay, Basic Color Terms. Their Universality and Evolution (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969).
Rolf Kuschel and Torben Monberg, “‘We Don’t Talk Much About Colour Here’: A Study of Color Semantics on Bellona Island,” Man 9 (1974): 218, 221, 229.
Nigel Barley, “Old English Color Classification: Where do Matters Stand?” in Anglo-Saxon England 3, ed. Peter Clemoes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974), p. 21;
J. D. Burnley, “Middle English Lexical Terminology and Lexical Structure,” Linguistische Berichte 41 (1976): 42, 44;
Klaus Ostheeren, “Toposforschung und Bedeutungslehre,” Anglia 89 (1971): 47;
C. P. Biggam, “Aspects of Chaucer’s Adjectives of Hue,” The Chaucer Review 28 (1993): 51;
Eleanor Irwin, Colour Terms in Greek Poetry (Toronto: Hakkert, 1974), p. 202;
B. A. C. Saunders and J. van Brakel, “Are There Non-Trivial Constraints on Colour Categorization?,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1997): 176.
J. Van Brakel, “The Plasticity of Categories: The Case of Colour,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (1993): 103–135.
Some speakers use the same word for black as for white: Barbara Saunders and J. Van Brakel, “Rewriting Color,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (2001): 542;
Barbara Saunders, “Revisiting Basic Color Terms,” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 6 (2000): 81–99.
M. Durbin, “Basic Terms Off-Color?” Semiotica 6 (1972): 259.
Paul Kay, Brent Berlin, Luisa Maffi, and William Merrifield, “Color Naming Across Languages,” in Color Categories in Thought and Language, ed. C. L. Hardin and Luisa Maffi (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp. 21–58.
Robert MacLaury, “From Brightness to Hue: An Explanatory Model of Color-Category Evolution,” Current Anthropology 33 (1992): 137–186.
Barbara Saunders, “Toward a New Topology of Color,” in Anthropology of Color (Amsterdam: J. Benjamins, 2007); John A. Lucy, “The Linguistics of ‘Color,’” in Hardin and Maffi, Color Categories, pp. 320–346.
James Boster, “Categories and Cognitive Anthropology,” in Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science, ed. Henri Cohen and Claire Lefebvre (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005), p. 109.
Paul Feyerabend, Against Method (London: Verso, 1978), pp. 45, 75.
Christopher Norris, Truth Matters (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2002), p. 194.
Pierre Bourdieu, Distinction (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984), p. 54.
Jacques Rancière, The Philosopher and His Poor (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003), pp, 165–202.
Tony Bennett, “Habitus Clivé. Aesthetics and Politics in the Work of Pierre Bourdieu,” in New Directions in American Reception Study, ed. Philip Goldstein and Jaes Machor (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 57–86.
On Bourdieu’s categories as mythic “megadistinctions,” see Stephan Fuchs, Against Essentialism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001), p. 159.
Jeffrey Alexander, “Clifford Geertz and the Strong Program,” in Interpreting Clifford Geertz (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2011), p. 57.
Eric Slauter, “Revolutions in the Meaning and Study of Politics,” American Literary History 22: 1–16; John Loeschen, The Divine Community: Trinity, Church and Ethics in Reformation Theologies (Kirksville, MS: Northeast Missouri State University Press, 1981), p. 222.
Thomas Tanselle, “Some Statistics onAmerican Printing, 1764–1783,” in The Press and the American Revolution, ed. Bernard Bailyn and John Hench (Worcester: America Antiquarian Society, 1980), pp. 315–363.
Richard Biernacki, “Time Cents: The Monetization of the Workday in Comparative Perspective,” in Now Here. Space, Time, and Modernity, ed. Roger Friedland and Deirdre Boden (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994).
Clifford Geertz, The Interpretation of Cultures (New York: Basic Books, 1977), pp. 412–453.
The air pump as in Steven Shapin and Simon Schaffter, Leviathan and the Air Pump. Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989).
Joseph Rouse, “Kuhn’s Philosophy of Scientific Practice,” in Thomas Kuhn, ed. Thomas Nickles (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 101–121.
Thomas Kuhn, Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Third Edition, 1996), pp. 44, 192.
Thomas Nickles, “Kuhn, Historical Philosophy of Science, and Case-Based Reasoning,” Configurations 6 (1998): 72–73.
Max Weber, Max Weber on The Methodology of the Social Sciences (Glencoe: The Free Press, 1949), p. 90; emphases in the original. My quote inverts the original order of sentences.
John Taylor, Linguistic Categorization. Prototypes in Linguistic Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995), p. 258.
Tzvetan Todorov, The Fantastic (Case Western Reserve University Press, 1973), p. 22.
Wilhelm Hennis, Max Weber. Essays in Reconstruction (London: Allen & Unwin, 1988), p. 47.
Ronald Bontekoe, Dimensions of the Hermeneutic Circle (New Jersey: Humanities Press, 1996), p. 185.
Max Weber, From Max Weber (New York: Oxford University Press, 1946), p. 135.
Bruno Bachimont, “Formal Signs and Numerical Computation,” in Instruments in Art and Science, ed. Helmar Schramm, Ludger Schwarte, and Jan Lazardig (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2008), p. 372.
Max Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1958), pp. 155–161.
Zoltân Kövecses, Metaphor and Emotion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), p. 176.
Eleanor H. Rosch, “On the Internal Structure of Perceptual and Semantic Categories,” in Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, ed. Timothy Moore (New York: Academic Press, 1973), pp. 138, 142.;
John Taylor, Linguistic Categorization. Prototypes in Linguistic Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).
Larry Hedges, “The Role of Construct Validity in Generalization,” in Causality in Crisis? Statistical Methods and the Search for Causal Knowledge in the Social Sciences, ed. Vaugn McKim and Stephen P. Turner (University of Notre Dame Press, 1997), pp. 325–342.
Roy D’Andrade, The Development of Cognitive Anthropology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), p. 247.
William F. Hanks, Language and Communicative Practices (Westview Press, 1996), pp. 295–305.
Ernst Tugendhat, Philosophische Aufsätze (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1992), pp. 267–272.
Peter Barker, Xiang Chen, and Hanne Andersen, “Kuhn on Concepts and Categorization,” in Thomas Kuhn, ed. Thomas Nickels (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 218–219.
Henry Petroski, Design Paradigms. Case Histories of Error and Judgment in Engineering (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), p. 166; John Warrall, “Normal Science and Dogmatism, Paradigms and Progress; Kuhn ‘versus’ Popper and Lakatos,” in Nickels, Thomas Kuhn, pp. 79–80.
J. Zvi Namenwirth and Robert Philip Weber, The Dynamics of Culture (Boston: Allen & Unwin, 1987), p. 238. Where translation fails, the hermeneuticist Hans-Georg Gadamer wrote of classification, “there thinking breaks through.”
Giorgio Agamben, The Signature of All Things (New York: Zone Books, 2009), p. 24.
Max Weber, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre (Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, 1968), p. 192.
Paul Jorion, Comment la vérité et la réalité furent inventées (Paris: Gallimard, 2009), p. 250.
As cited in Avital Ronell, The Test Drive (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2005), p. 47.
Robert Stenvenson, “In Praise of Dumb Clerks,” in Theory, Method, and Practice in Computer ContentAnalysis, ed. Mark West (Westport, CT: Ablex, 2001), p. 17.
Doug Arnold, Louisa Sadler, and Aline Villavicencio, “Portuguese: Corpora, Coordination, and Agreement,” in Roots. Linguistics in Search of Its Evidential Base, ed. Sam Featherston and Wolfgang Sternefeld (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2007), p. 25.
Julia Kristeva, “Prolegomena to the Concept of ‘Text,’” in Literary Debate. Texts and Contexts, ed. Dennis Hollier and Jeffrey Melhman (New York: The New Press, 1999), p. 304.
Giorgio Agamben, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998); State of Exception (Chicago: University of Chicago, 1995).
Gérard Genette, The Architext (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992), p. 71.
Jean-Marie Schaeffer, “Literary Genres and Textual Genericity,” in The Future of Literary Theory, ed. Ralph Cohen (London: Routledge, 1989), p. 176.
Erich Auerbach, Mimesis. The Representation of Reality in Western Literature (Princeton University Press, 2003), p. 556.
David Lodge, The Modes of Modern Writing (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1977), p. 25.
Charles Muscatine, Medieval Literature, Style, and Culture (Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1999), pp. 72, 213.
Roger Starling, “‘Scenes From the Life of One Who is Suited for Nothing’: Shakespeare and the Question of Mimesis,” and Peter Holland, “Hamlet and Auerbach,” in Refiguring Mimesis. Representation in Early Modern Literature, ed. Jonathan Holmes and Adrian Streete (University of Hertfordshire Press, 2005), pp. xiv and 23.
Erwin Panofsky, Gothic Architecture and Scholasticism (New York: Meridian, 1976), pp. 59–60.
Robert Marichal, “L’écriture latine et la civilisation occidentale,” in Centre Internationale de Synthèse, L’écriture et la psychologie des peuples (Paris: Armand Colin, 1964), pp. 232–241.
Michael Baxandall, Patterns of Intention. On the Historical Explanation of Pictures (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985), p. 131.
Lynn Hunt, The Family Romance of the French Revolution (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993).
Amir R. Alexander, Geometrical Landscapes. The Voyages of Discovery and the Transformation of Mathematical Practices (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002).
Oleg Kharkhordin, The Collective and the Individual in Russia. A Study of Practices (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999).
Sherry Ortner, “Patterns of History. Cultural Schemas in the Foundings of Sherpa Religions Institutions,” in Culture through Time, ed. Emiko Ohnuki-Tierney (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990), pp. 57–93.
Clifford Geertz, Local Knowledge (New York: Basic Books, 1985), p. 35.
Robert Musil, Gesammelte Werke (Hamburg: Rowohlt, 1978), vol. 8, p. 1170;
Arne Naess, Interpretation and Preciseness (Oslo: Skrivemaskinstua Universitets Studentkontor, 1947), p. 51;
Stanley Cavell, Philosophical Passages (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1995), p. 81. Bibliography: http://www.biernackireviews.com/.
Copyright information
© 2012 Richard Biernacki
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Biernacki, R. (2012). Wary Reasoning. In: Reinventing Evidence in Social Inquiry. Cultural Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137007285_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137007285_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-00727-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-00728-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)