Abstract
A neo-Victorian creative and critical desire to materialise Victorian ghosts finds affinity with epistolary strategies that mediate ideas of the occult within fiction. Writers repeatedly conjure the riddling world of nineteenth-century spiritualism with ‘authentic’ and ‘sincere’ diary voices that test the mysteries and contrived counterfeiting of mediumistic practices. Demonstrating an affinity between epistolary strategies and the keen neo-Victorian interest in spiritualism, popular novels like Sarah Waters’s Affinity (1999) and the lesser-known Selene of the Spirits (1998) by Melissa Pritchard interpolate diary accounts as documented ‘evidence’ to either anchor or contest paranormal claims. In traditional narrative, expectations of diary sincerity may authorise veracity, but for revisionist texts the potential for unreliable diary writing proves a constructive concept to examine faith and doubt in spiritualist discourses.3 Drawing on H. Porter Abbott’s observation that it is a ‘mixture of sincerity and self-deception that governs [the diary] text’, this chapter investigates the different ways in which Waters and Pritchard manipulate epistolary expectations to creatively interrogate our critical vision of the Victorian occult.4
Good ghosts, speaking by book, make poor subjects, and it was clear that from the first my hovering prowling blighting presences, my pair of abnormal agents, would have to depart altogether from the rules.
Henry James Preface to The Turn of the Screw (1898)1
At this place the entry in the Diary ceases to be legible. The two or three lines which follow, contain fragments of words only, mingled with blots and scratches of the pen.
Wilkie Collins The Woman in White (1860)2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Henry James, Preface to The Aspern Papers and The Turn of the Screw (London: Penguin Books, 1988 [1888]), p. 40.
Wilkie Collins, The Woman in White (London: Penguin, 2003 [1860]), p. 336.
H. Porter Abbott, Diary Fiction: Writing as Action (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984), p. 19.
Sarah Waters, ‘Wolfskins and Togas: Maude Meagher’s The Green Scamander and the Lesbian Historical Novel’, Women: A Cultural Review, 7 (1996), 176–88 (186). In this critical examination, Waters investigates early twentieth-century novelists who tried to recover a lesbian past by reconstructing ancient cultures in historical fiction.
Cora Kaplan, Victoriana: Histories, Fictions, Criticism (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007), p. 114.
Diane Elam, Romancing the Postmodern (London: Routledge, 2002), p. 12.
Christina Rossetti, ‘The Queen of Hearts’, in Selected Poems of Christina Rossetti (Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions, 2001), p. 123.
Ann Heilmann and Mark Llewellyn, Neo-Victorianism: The Victorians in the Twenty-First Century, 1999–2009 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010), p. 173.
See Janet Oppenheim, The Other World: Spiritualism and Psychical Research in England, 1850–1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) for an account of Crookes’s experiments with Cook.
Jerome de Groot, The Historical Novel (London: Routledge, 2010), p. 182.
See Tatiana Kontou, Spirituality and Women’s Writing: From the Fin de Siècle to the Neo-Victorian (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009) for an analysis of Roberts’s adaptation of Cook’s story.
Examples include Julian Barnes’s Arthur and George (2005), which is prefaced with a ‘Note’ pointing out that quotation from letters, newspapers, government reports, proceedings in Parliaments, and the interpolated writings of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle are all ‘authentic’ documentary sources. Roberts, by contrast, prefaces In the Red Kitchen (1991), by stating she has ‘freely adapted the (disputed) facts’ of the life of Florence Cook for fiction. Roberts 1991, n.p. Kate Summerscale alternatively introduces her 2008 documentary book, The Suspicions of Mr Whicher, by tracing the palimpsestuous history of the 1860 Road Hill Murder.
Patricia Waugh, Metafiction: The Theory and Practice of Self-Conscious Fiction (London: Routledge, 1990), p. 6.
Trevor H. Hall, The Spiritualists: The Story of Florence Cook and William Crookes (New York: Helix Press, 1963), pp. 170–1. This text was later reprinted as The Medium and the Scientist (New York: Prometheus Books, 1984). Admitting that he is unable to ‘prove beyond doubt’ that Cook was Crookes’s mistress, Hall acknowledges that ‘this can only be a matter of surmise against the background of the story as a whole’. He nevertheless deduces a ‘violent sexual relationship’ between them and further hypothesises that Cook may have deliberately seduced Crookes following her dramatic exposure by Volckman. This, according to Hall, results in a problem in conceiving ‘of any other motive’ for Crookes’s behaviour. Hall, p. 106.
Anne Carson, Eros the Bittersweet (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986), p. 10, original emphasis.
Steven Connor, ‘The Machine in the Ghost: Spiritualism, Technology, and the “Direct Voice”’, in Ghosts: Deconstruction, Psychoanalysis, History, ed. by Peter Buse and Andrew Stott (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1999), pp. 203–25 (204).
Jeanette King, The Victorian Woman Question in Contemporary Feminist Fiction (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), p. 94.
Alex Owen, The Darkened Room: Women, Power and Spiritualism in Late Victorian England (London: Virago, 1989), p. 10.
Janet Gurkin Altman, Epistolarity: Approaches to a Form (Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 1982), p. 22.
Edgar Allan Poe, ‘The Purloined Letter’, Tales of Mystery and Imagination (London: CRW Publishing, 2003 [1844]).
Charlotte Brontë, Jane Eyre (London: Penguin, 2006 [1847]), p. 376.
Rohan McWilliam, ‘Victorian Sensations, Neo-Victorian Romances’, Victorian Studies, 52 (2009), 106–13 (109).
Tzvetan Todorov, The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre, trans. by Richard Howard and Robert Scholes (New York: Cornell University Press, 1975).
H. Porter Abbott, ‘Letters to the Self: The Cloistered Writer in Nonretrospective Fiction’, PMLA, 95 (1980), 23–41 (23).
Elizabeth Barrett Browning, Aurora Leigh, Book VII (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998 [1856]), p. 240.
Sarah Waters, Affinity (London: Virago, 2000 [1999]), p. 235. All other references to this text will appear parenthetically as SW.
Terry Castle, The Apparitional Lesbian: Female Homosexuality and Modern Culture (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993). In her critical article, Waters clearly identifies branches of theorising that she believes fall short of addressing writers’ engagement with lesbian history. She cites Castle’s study as ‘impressive’, but limiting. She reasons that Castle may readily acknowledge individual novels as ‘groundbreaking’, but, disappointingly for Waters, she does not place these works in a larger context that would illustrate a developing tradition in historical fiction. ‘Wolfskins’, p. 177.
Michèle Roberts, ‘Author’s Note’, In the Red Kitchen (London: Minerva, 1991), no page number.
Lucie Armitt and Sarah Gamble, ‘The Haunted Geometries of Sarah Waters’s Affinity’, Textual Practice, 20 (2006), 141–59 (148).
Gerald Prince, ‘The Diary Novel: Notes for the Definition of a Sub-Genre’, Neophilologus, 59 (1975), 477–81 (479).
Marie-Luise Kohlke argues that Margaret’s ‘would-be historical subjectivity stages itself in the shadow of her dead historian-father’ M.-L. Kohlke, ‘Into History through the Back Door: The “Past Historic” in Nights at the Circus and Affinity’, Women: A Cultural Review, 15 (2004), 153–66 (157).
Mark Llewellyn also observes that Margaret’s ‘diary begins with a longing for her father’, which he suggests ‘reflects her desire for “masculine” mental empowerment’. Mark Llewellyn, ‘“Queer? I should say it is criminal!”: Sarah Waters’ Affinity’, Journal of Gender Studies, 13 (2004), 203–14 (p. 207). Llewellyn explores this further to understand tensions produced in Margaret’s diary: ‘Margaret draws a conscious distinction between the narrative drive which has emboldened her to undertake her diary and her need to find solace and peace from the tempers of her heart in logic, reasoning and a masculine view of the role of the chronicler of history’. Llewellyn (2007: 199).
Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. by Alan Sheridan (London: Penguin Books, 1991), p. 202.
Thomas Mallon, A Book of One’s Own: People and Their Diaries (London: Pan Books Ltd, 1985), p. xvii.
Rosario Arias and Patricia Pulham (eds), Haunting and Spectrality in Neo-Victorian Fiction: Possessing the Past (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), p. xix.
Diana Wallace, The Woman’s Historical Novel: British Women Writers, 1900–2000 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), p. 208.
Copyright information
© 2013 Kym Brindle
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brindle, K. (2013). Spectral Diarists: Sarah Waters’s Affinity and Melissa Pritchard’s Selene of the Spirits . In: Epistolary Encounters in Neo-Victorian Fiction. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137007162_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137007162_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43531-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-00716-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)