Skip to main content

The Rogue Phenomenon

  • Chapter
  • 231 Accesses

Part of the book series: American Foreign Policy in the 21st Century ((AMP21C))

Abstract

A small crowd gathered in Baghdad’s Firdos Square as US military forces overran Iraq’s violent and chaotic capital.1 Passersby took turns smashing a sledgehammer into Saddam Hussein’s statue to no avail. The bronze likeness stood immune to the puny assaults by the Baghdadis. With its right arm raised up as if saluting the future, the hubristic statue built by Hussein to himself defied its would-be destroyers. It was left to the invading military forces to bring down this emblem of the Iraqi dictatorship.

The risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face.

—Madeleine Albright

It is better to be feared than loved.

—Niccolò Machiavelli

Who is going to bell the cat?

—Aesop

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Michael R. Gordon and General Bernard E. Trainor, Cobra II: The Inside Story of the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq (New York: Pantheon, 2006), 390–433.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For an article critical of the media’s handling of the statue’s collapse, see Peer Maass, “The Toppling,” New Yorker, January 10, 2011, pp. 25–31 and 54.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thucydides, History of the Peloponnesian War, trans. Rex Warner (London: Penguin Books, 1972), 408.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ernst Badian, Foreign Clientelae, 264–70 B.C. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1958), 281.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Richard B. Barker, Uncle Sam in Barbary: A Diplomatic History (Gainesville: University of Florida Press, 2004), 145–47; and

    Google Scholar 

  6. Joseph Wheelan, Jefferson’s War: America’s First War on Terror, 1801–1805 (New York: Carroll and Graf Publishers, 2003), 350–66.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jim Michaels, “Pirates’ New Tactics Make Navies’ Job Harder,” USA Today, January 7, 2011, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Adrian Tinniswood, Pirates of Barbary: Corsairs, Conquests, and Captivity in the Seventeenth-Century Mediterranean (New York: Riverhead Books, 2010), 210–27 and 233–43.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. G. Chapulina, “The Barbary Corsairs” Blackwood’s 328, no. 1982 (December 1980): 483–89.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Simon Smith, “Piracy in Early British America,” History Today 46, no. 5 (May 1996): 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For greater treatment of early rogues, see Thomas H. Henriksen, “The Rise and Decline of Rogue States,” Journal of International Affairs 54, no. 2 (Spring 2004): 349–73.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Avner Cohen, Israel and the Bomb (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998), 277.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thomas Erdbrink and Joby Warrick, “Iran Derides Sanctions, Talks of Reducing Cooperation with Inspectors,” Washington Post, June 11, 2010, A8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. James Adams, The Unnatural Alliance: Israel and South Africa (London: Quartet Books, 1984), 187–96; and

    Google Scholar 

  15. Seymour Hersh, The Samson Option: Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal and American Foreign Policy (New York: Random House, 1991), 271.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mitchell Reiss, Bridled Ambition: Why Countries Constrain Their Nuclear Capabilities (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 1995), 32.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yevgeny Primakov, Russia and the Arabs: Behind the Scenes in the Middle East from the Cold War to the Present (New York: Basic Books, 2009), 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thomas H. Henriksen, American Power after the Berlin Wall (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), 210–12.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. John Marcum, The Angolan Revolution: Volume II, Exile Politics and Guerrilla Warfare, 1962–1976 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1978), 275.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sheldon M. Stern, Averting “The Final Failure” (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003), 388.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Walter Laqueur, The New Terrorism: Fanaticism and the Arms of Mass Destruction (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), 160.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Christopher C. Harmon, Terrorism Today (London: Frank Cass, 2000), 13.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Louise Richardson, What Terrorists Want (New York: Random House, 2006), 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  24. George Bush and Brent Scowcroft, A World Transformed (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1998), 320.

    Google Scholar 

  25. The sheriff analogy is that of Richard N. Haass, The Reluctant Sheriff: The United States after the Cold War (New York: Council of Foreign Relations, 1997), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  26. For an excellent study of movements of rage, see Ken Jowitt, New World Disorder: The Leninist Extinction (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992), 275–77.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Thomas L. Friedman, “Clinton’s Security Aide Gives a Vision for Foreign Policy,” New York Times, September 22, 1993, A18.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bill Clinton, “Remarks to Future Leaders of Europe in Brussels, January 9, 1994,” in Public Papers of Presidents, William J. Clinton, Volume I (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1994), 11.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Christopher Marquis, “U.S. Declares ‘Rogue Nations’ Are Now ‘States of Concern,’” New York Times, June 20, 2000, A1.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Anthony Lake, “Confronting Backlash States,” Foreign Affairs 73, no. 2 (March/April 1994): 45–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. For more on this view, see James Mann, “N. Korean Missiles Have Russian Roots, Explosive Theory Suggests,” Los Angeles Times, September 6, 2000, A1.

    Google Scholar 

  32. David Albright, Peddling Peril: How the Secret Nuclear Trade Arms America’s Enemies (New York: Free Press, 2010), 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bill Gertz, “Chinese Companies Sent Missile Parts to N. Korea,” Washington Times, July 20, 1999, A1.

    Google Scholar 

  34. “Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute for International Studies,” cited in Barbara Slavin, “Missile Program Holds Key to N. Korea’s Foreign Relations,” USA Today, November 6, 2000, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Joby Warrick, “Iran Close to Nuclear Capability, IAEA Says,” Washington Post, November 7, 2011, A1.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Many front-rank theorists slight the role of rogue players in international affairs. See John J. Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Powers Politics (New York: W. W. Norton, 2001);

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hans Morgenthau, Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 5th ed. (New York: Knopf, 1973);

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kenneth Waltz, Theory of International Politics (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Company, 1979); and

    Google Scholar 

  39. Robert J. Art and Kenneth N. Waltz, The Use of Force: Military Power and International Politics, 7th ed. (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  40. For a description of this argument, see Robert S. Litwak, Rogue States and U.S. Foreign Policy: Containment after the Cold War (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 2000), xiv.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2012 Thomas H. Henriksen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Henriksen, T.H. (2012). The Rogue Phenomenon. In: America and the Rogue States. American Foreign Policy in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137006400_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics