Skip to main content

Food Security, Food Sovereignty and Global Governance Regimes in the Context of Climate Change and Food Availability

  • Chapter
Climate Change and Global Policy Regimes

Part of the book series: International Political Economy ((IPES))

  • 691 Accesses

Abstract

Global governance, as Henk Overbeek notes, was an initially radical (and hence marginal) concept when it first emerged in the 1970s, challenging the then-prevailing configurations of political economic power via proposals for a New International Economic Order, to be presided over by ‘humane and democratic institutions’ (Overbeek et al. 2010: 697–698). Following the Soviet Union’s collapse and the neoliberal counter-revolution, global governance became domesticated and then mainstreamed into a ‘euphemism for the global rule of capital’ (Overbeek et al. 2010: 697). As neo-liberal market ideology falters in the aftermath of the tumultuous events of 2008–2009, Overbeek detects the early signs of a Polanyian ‘double-movement’, in the form of a turn from ‘market-based governance to state-led government’, and he concludes by quipping that ‘the discussion about “global governance” [will soon become] a debate among historians rather than social scientists’ (Overbeek et al. 2010: 701–702).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aerni, P. 2011. Food sovereignty and its discontents. ATDF journal, 8 (1/2), 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M.A. and Toledo, V.M. 2011. The agroecological revolution in Latin America: rescuing nature, ensuring food sovereignty and empowering peasants. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 38 (3), 587–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. 2010. Scaling up agroecological approaches for food sovereignty in Latin America. In: H. Wittman, A.A. Desmarais and N. Wiebe, eds. Food sovereignty: reconnecting food, nature and community. Black Point, NS: Fernwood Publishing, 120–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. 1968. The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beddington, J., Asaduzzaman, M., Clark, M., Fernandez, A., Guillou, M., Jahn, M., Erda, L., Mamo, T., Van Bo, N., Nobre, C.A., Scholes, R., Sharma, R. and Wakhungu, J. 2012. Achieving food security in the face of climate change: final report from the Commission on Sustainable Agriculture and Climate Change. CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS). Copenhagen, Denmark. Available online at: www.ccafs.cgiar.org/commission, accessed 20 April 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bello, W. 2000. Why reform of the WTO is the wrong agenda. Kasarinlan: Philippine journal of third world studies, 15 (1), 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumpus, A.G. and Liverman, D.M. 2010. Carbon colonialism? Offsets, greenhouse gas reductions, and sustainable development. In: R. Peet, P. Robbins and M. Watts, eds. Global political ecology. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadman, T. 2011. Quality and legitimacy of global governance: case lessons from forestry. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Civil Society Mechanism (CSM). undated. CSM working statement on the GSF. http://www.csm4cfs.org/policy_working_groups-6/global_strategic_ framework-8/gsf_draft_1–45/, accessed 8 May 2012.

  • CSM. 2010. Civil Society Working Statement on the draft Global Strategic Framework for food security and nutrition, December 2011. 6/global_strategic_framework http://www.csm4cfs.org/policy_working_groups-8 /cso_working_document_ on_the_gsf-41/, accessed 8 May 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on World Food Security. 2012. Global strategic framework for food security and nutrition: first draft. FAO, http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/ cfs/Docs 1112/WGs/GSF/CFSBriefing27Feb2012/MD067_CFS_GSF_Draft_One_ En.pdf, accessed 2 May 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on World Food Security. 2009. Reform of the Committee on world food security: final version. CFS:2009/2, Rev.2.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Schutter, O. 2011. Food crises: five priorities for the G20. The Guardian, 16 June 2011, http://www.srfood.org/index.php/en/component/content/ article/ 1-latest-news/ 1394-g20-agriculture-5 -priorities-to-end-food-crises, accessed 4 October 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Schutter, O. 2010. Countries tackling hunger with a right to food approach: significant progress in implementing the right to food at national scale in Africa, Latin America and South Asia. Briefing Note 1, May 2010, http://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/food/docs/Briefing_Note_01_May_2010_EN.pdf, accessed 16 April 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Schutter, O. 2009. Governing world food security: a new role for the Committee on world food security. Right to food quarterly, 4 (1), 2–3, http://www.fian.org/resources/documents/categoria-3/right-to-foodquarterly-vol-4-no.1/pdf, accessed 15 August 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douzinas, C. 2000. The end of human rights. Oxford: Hart Publishing,

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes, C. 2006. Must the losers of free trade go hungry? Reconciling WTO obligations and the right to food. Virginia journal of international law, 47, 619–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, M. and James, C. 2011. Peasants’ rights and the UN system: quixotic struggle? Or emancipatory idea whose time has come? Journal ofpeasant studies, 38 (1), 81–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, T. 2005. The politics of human rights, 2nd edition. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRAIN. 2010. The new farm owners: corporate investors and the control of overseas farmland. In: F. Magdoff and B. Tokar, eds. Agriculture and food in crisis: conflict, resistance and renewal. New York: Monthly Review Press, 139–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. 2003. The new imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, R., Scholes, R. and Ash, N. (eds). 2005. Millennium ecosystem assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being current state and trends. Volume 1. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HLPE. 2012. Food security and climate change: A report by the High-Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security. Rome: June 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt-Giménez, E. and Shattuck, A. 2011. Food crises, food regimes and food movements: rumblings of reform or tides of transformation? Journal of peasant studies, 38(1), 109–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development. 2008. Executive summary of the synthesis report. Johannesburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, W.A. 2011. Food sovereignty: old protectionism in somewhat recycled bottles. ATDF Journal, 8 (1/2), 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. 2007. The shock doctrine: the rise of disaster capitalism. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Via Campesina. 2011. La Via Campesina call to Durban: soil carbon is not for sale. http://www.redd-monitor.org/2011/09/17/our-carbon-is-not-for-salevia-campesina-rejects-redd-again/, accessed 21 September 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Via Campesina. 2009. Draft declaration of rights of peasants – women and men. Seoul, March 2009, http://viacampesina.net/downloads/PDF/EN-3.pdf, accessed 3 October 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynas, M. 2009. Six Degrees: our future on a hotter planet. London: Fourth Estate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magdoff, F. and Tokar, B. 2010. Agriculture and food in crisis: an overview. In: F. Magdoff and B. Tokar, eds. Agriculture and food in crisis: conflict, resistance and renewal. New York: Monthly Review Press, 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monbiot, G. 2004. The age of consent: a manifesto for a new world order. London: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.W. 2010. The end of the road? Agricultural revolutions in capitalist world ecology, 1450–2010. Journal of agrarian change, 10 (3), 389–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overbeek, H.W., Dingwerth, K., Pattberg, P. and Compagnon, D. 2010. Forum: global governance: decline or maturation of an academic concept? International studies review, 12: 696–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overbeek, H. W. 2004. Global governance, class, hegemony: a historical materialist perspective. In: A.D. Ba and M.J. Hoffmann, eds. Contending perspectives on global governance: coherence, contestation and world order. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet, R., Robbins, P. and Watts, M., eds. 2010. Global political ecology. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, J. 2010. Can agriculture feed 9 billion people? In: F. Magdoff and B. Tokar, eds. Agriculture and food in crisis: conflict, resistance and renewal. New York: Monthly Review Press, 283–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiavoni, C. and Camacaro, W. 2009. The Venezuelan effort to build a new food and agriculture system. Monthly review, 61 (3), 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobhan, H., Guerra, A. and Rahman, A.F.M.S., eds. 2012. The Committee on world food security: a guide for civil society. International Food Security Network, http://www.iatp.org/files/CFS_Booklet_FinaLpdf, accessed 1 May 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southgate, D. 2011. Food sovereignty: The idea’s origins and dubious merits. ATDF journal, 8 (1/2), 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, Richard H. 2002. In the shadow of law or power? Consensus-based bargaining and outcomes in the GATT/WTO. International organization, 56(2), 339–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N. 2008. The economics of climate change. American economic review: papers & proceedings, 2008, 98(2), 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokar, B. 2010. Biofuels and the global food crisis. In: F. Magdoff and B. Tokar, eds. Agriculture and food in crisis: conflict, resistance and renewal. New York: Monthly Review Press, 121–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weis, A.J. 2007. Theglobal food economy: the battle for the future of farming. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R. 2011. Measuring the WTO’s performance: an alternative account. Global policy, 2 (1), 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, H., Desmarais, A.A. and Wiebe, N. 2010. Food sovereignty: reconnecting food, nature and community. Black Point, NS: Fernwood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Nick Rose

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rose, N. (2013). Food Security, Food Sovereignty and Global Governance Regimes in the Context of Climate Change and Food Availability. In: Cadman, T. (eds) Climate Change and Global Policy Regimes. International Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137006127_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics