Abstract
Early modern letters once composed and dispatched had a peculiar afterlife that is textual, historic and archival. Letters were preserved and archived by contemporaries in a range of ways. They were locked in muniments rooms, endorsed usually with the date and a brief note of contents then folded and placed in bundles; they were kept in studies or closets, referenced for ease of retrieval as part of complex filing systems; they were also hidden under beds in trunks, and even threaded on wire. This concern for preservation stimulated practices for safe-keeping correspondence. Recipe books of the period include instructions for how to preserve paper and how to treat it to prevent it from being eaten by mice. The kinds of formal letter-books and manuscript miscellanies, discussed in the previous chapter, should likewise be considered as ways of preserving correspondence. The process continues today in repositories, record offices and research institutions. Later generations of conservators, charged with the task of safeguarding their ‘archives’ for posterity have sought to intervene in various ways — washing paper, treating it with chemical preservatives, tightly binding individual letters into leather-bound volumes, attaching manuscripts to gauze — though current methods are far less intrusive. The reasons that motivated officials, individuals or families to keep their correspondence, range from the bureaucratic and legal to the more personal and sentimental. The chapter focuses on two main aspects relating to the preservation and afterlife of letters.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Harold Love (1983) Scribal Publication in Seventeenth-Century England (Oxford: Clarendon Press)
H.R. Woudhuysen (1996) Sir Philip Sidney and the Circulation of Manuscripts, 1558–1640 (Oxford: Clarendon Press)
Arthur F. Marotti (1995) Manuscript, Print and the English Renaissance Lyric (Ithaca: Cornell UP)
Peter Beal (1998) ‘“Hoping they shall only come to your merciful eyes”: Sidney’s Letter to Queen Elizabeth and Its Transmission’, in In Praise of Scribes: Manuscripts and their Makers in Seventeenth-Century England (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp.109-46, 274–80
Andrew Gordon (2007) ‘“A fortune of Paper Walls”: The Letters of Francis Bacon and the Earl of Essex’, ELR, 37/3, 319–36
Andrew Gordon (2010) ‘Copycopia, or the Place of Copied Correspondence in Manuscript Culture: A Case Study’ in James Daybell and Peter Hinds (eds) Material Readings of Early Modern Culture, 1580–1730: Texts and Social Practices (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp.65-82
Daybell (2010) ‘Women, Politics and Domesticity: The scribal Publication of Lady Rich’s Letter to Elizabeth I’, in Anne Lawrence-Mathers and Phillipa Hardman (eds) Women and Writing, C.1340-C.1650: The Domestication of Print Culture (Woodbridge: Boydell and Brewer), pp. 111–30.
Gary Schneider (2008) ‘Libellous Letters in Elizabethan and Early Stuart England’, Modern Philology, 105/3, 475–509.
Ffiona Swabey (1998) ‘The Letter Book of Alice de Bryene and Alice de Sutton’s List of Debts’, Nottingham Mediaeval Studies, 42, 121–45 (p.136).
Adam Smyth (2008) ‘Almanacs, Annotators, and Life-Writing in Early Modern England’, ELR, 38/2, 200–44.
Richard T. Spence (1997) Lady Anne Clifford: Countess of Pembroke, Dorset and Montgomery (1590–1676) (Stroud: Sutton), pp.177-9.
Nancy Pollard Brown (1989) ‘Paperchase: The Dissemination of Catholic Texts in Elizabethan England’, EMS, 1, 120–44.
Andrew Gordon (2002) ‘The Act of Libel: Conscripting Civic Space in Early Modern England’, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 32/3, 375–97 (pp.385-90).
William S. Powell (1977) John Pory, 1572–1636: The Life and Letters of a Man of Many Parts (Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P), p.56.
Jason Scott-Warren (2000) ‘Reconstructing Manuscript Networks: The Textual Transactions of Sir Stephen Powle’, in Alexandra Shepherd and Phil Withington (eds) Communities in Early Modem England (Manchester: Manchester UP), pp.18-37 (p.19).
Kevin Sharpe (1979) Sir Robert Cotton 1586–1631: History and Politics in Early Modem England (Oxford: OUP), p. 78.
Derek Hirst (2003) ‘Reading the Royal Romance: Or, Intimacy in a King’s Cabinet’, Seventeenth Century, 18/2, 211–29.
Peter Mack (2002) Elizabethan Rhetoric: Theory and Practice (Cambridge: CUP), p.110.
David Colclough (2000) ‘“The Muses Recreation’: John Hoskyns and the Manuscript Culture of the Seventeenth Century’, HLQ, 61, 369–400.
Daniel Woolf (2003) The Social Circulation of the Past: English Historical Culture 1500–1730 (Oxford: OUP), ch.5.
D.C. Greetham (1992) Textual Scholarship: An Introduction (New York and London: Garland, 1992), pp.323-35, 363, 364.
Adam Smyth (2006) ‘“Reade in One Age and Understood I’ Th’ Next”: Recycling Satire in the Mid-Seventeenth Century’, HLQ, 69/1, 67–82.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 James Daybell
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Daybell, J. (2012). The Afterlives of Letters. In: The Material Letter in Early Modern England. Early Modern Literature in History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137006066_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137006066_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-30828-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-00606-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)