Skip to main content

The Afterlives of Letters

  • Chapter
  • 250 Accesses

Part of the book series: Early Modern Literature in History ((EMLH))

Abstract

Early modern letters once composed and dispatched had a peculiar afterlife that is textual, historic and archival. Letters were preserved and archived by contemporaries in a range of ways. They were locked in muniments rooms, endorsed usually with the date and a brief note of contents then folded and placed in bundles; they were kept in studies or closets, referenced for ease of retrieval as part of complex filing systems; they were also hidden under beds in trunks, and even threaded on wire. This concern for preservation stimulated practices for safe-keeping correspondence. Recipe books of the period include instructions for how to preserve paper and how to treat it to prevent it from being eaten by mice. The kinds of formal letter-books and manuscript miscellanies, discussed in the previous chapter, should likewise be considered as ways of preserving correspondence. The process continues today in repositories, record offices and research institutions. Later generations of conservators, charged with the task of safeguarding their ‘archives’ for posterity have sought to intervene in various ways — washing paper, treating it with chemical preservatives, tightly binding individual letters into leather-bound volumes, attaching manuscripts to gauze — though current methods are far less intrusive. The reasons that motivated officials, individuals or families to keep their correspondence, range from the bureaucratic and legal to the more personal and sentimental. The chapter focuses on two main aspects relating to the preservation and afterlife of letters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Harold Love (1983) Scribal Publication in Seventeenth-Century England (Oxford: Clarendon Press)

    Google Scholar 

  2. H.R. Woudhuysen (1996) Sir Philip Sidney and the Circulation of Manuscripts, 1558–1640 (Oxford: Clarendon Press)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Arthur F. Marotti (1995) Manuscript, Print and the English Renaissance Lyric (Ithaca: Cornell UP)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Peter Beal (1998) ‘“Hoping they shall only come to your merciful eyes”: Sidney’s Letter to Queen Elizabeth and Its Transmission’, in In Praise of Scribes: Manuscripts and their Makers in Seventeenth-Century England (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp.109-46, 274–80

    Google Scholar 

  5. Andrew Gordon (2007) ‘“A fortune of Paper Walls”: The Letters of Francis Bacon and the Earl of Essex’, ELR, 37/3, 319–36

    Google Scholar 

  6. Andrew Gordon (2010) ‘Copycopia, or the Place of Copied Correspondence in Manuscript Culture: A Case Study’ in James Daybell and Peter Hinds (eds) Material Readings of Early Modern Culture, 1580–1730: Texts and Social Practices (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp.65-82

    Google Scholar 

  7. Daybell (2010) ‘Women, Politics and Domesticity: The scribal Publication of Lady Rich’s Letter to Elizabeth I’, in Anne Lawrence-Mathers and Phillipa Hardman (eds) Women and Writing, C.1340-C.1650: The Domestication of Print Culture (Woodbridge: Boydell and Brewer), pp. 111–30.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gary Schneider (2008) ‘Libellous Letters in Elizabethan and Early Stuart England’, Modern Philology, 105/3, 475–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ffiona Swabey (1998) ‘The Letter Book of Alice de Bryene and Alice de Sutton’s List of Debts’, Nottingham Mediaeval Studies, 42, 121–45 (p.136).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Adam Smyth (2008) ‘Almanacs, Annotators, and Life-Writing in Early Modern England’, ELR, 38/2, 200–44.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Richard T. Spence (1997) Lady Anne Clifford: Countess of Pembroke, Dorset and Montgomery (1590–1676) (Stroud: Sutton), pp.177-9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nancy Pollard Brown (1989) ‘Paperchase: The Dissemination of Catholic Texts in Elizabethan England’, EMS, 1, 120–44.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Andrew Gordon (2002) ‘The Act of Libel: Conscripting Civic Space in Early Modern England’, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 32/3, 375–97 (pp.385-90).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. William S. Powell (1977) John Pory, 1572–1636: The Life and Letters of a Man of Many Parts (Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P), p.56.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jason Scott-Warren (2000) ‘Reconstructing Manuscript Networks: The Textual Transactions of Sir Stephen Powle’, in Alexandra Shepherd and Phil Withington (eds) Communities in Early Modem England (Manchester: Manchester UP), pp.18-37 (p.19).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kevin Sharpe (1979) Sir Robert Cotton 1586–1631: History and Politics in Early Modem England (Oxford: OUP), p. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Derek Hirst (2003) ‘Reading the Royal Romance: Or, Intimacy in a King’s Cabinet’, Seventeenth Century, 18/2, 211–29.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Peter Mack (2002) Elizabethan Rhetoric: Theory and Practice (Cambridge: CUP), p.110.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. David Colclough (2000) ‘“The Muses Recreation’: John Hoskyns and the Manuscript Culture of the Seventeenth Century’, HLQ, 61, 369–400.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Daniel Woolf (2003) The Social Circulation of the Past: English Historical Culture 1500–1730 (Oxford: OUP), ch.5.

    Google Scholar 

  21. D.C. Greetham (1992) Textual Scholarship: An Introduction (New York and London: Garland, 1992), pp.323-35, 363, 364.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Adam Smyth (2006) ‘“Reade in One Age and Understood I’ Th’ Next”: Recycling Satire in the Mid-Seventeenth Century’, HLQ, 69/1, 67–82.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2012 James Daybell

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Daybell, J. (2012). The Afterlives of Letters. In: The Material Letter in Early Modern England. Early Modern Literature in History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137006066_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics