Copying, Letter-Books and the Scribal Circulation of Letters
Early modern letters survive to us today in range of material forms. While multiple copies of an individual letter may be textually identical, one might survive as an‘original’ letter sent ostensibly to its first reader; another as a copy made by the sender or recipient and preserved in a formal ‘letter-book’; and ten others might be copies — extant as separates or contained within manuscript ‘miscellanies’ — made by compilers, later readers who read it through scribal publication. Many scholars (literary critics as well as historians) use text from sent letters, letter-books and miscellanies almost interchangeably without noting the important differences inflected by nuances in scribal status. The letter-book as genre was intimately connected with bureaucratic practice, concerned with the preservation of outgoing and incoming letters for purposes of record. At the same time, the selection of letters to be copied, and the ways in which correspondence was ordered to represent an individual and his or her epistolary connections in a particular light has a powerful impact on the ways in which we should read and interpret letter-books. Thus letter-books, which form the focus of section one of this chapter, preserved single copies of letters sent or received by an individual or group. Copies of certain letters, however, enjoyed wider circulation in manuscript (and print) beyond the named addressee of a letter and the relative privacy of a letter-book.
KeywordsMaterial Letter Individual Letter British Library Early Modern Period Paper Book
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Mary E. Hazard (2000) Elizabeth Silent Language (Lincoln and London: U of Nebraska P)Google Scholar
- 13.Robyn Adams and Rosanna Cox (eds) (2011) Diplomacy and Early Modem Culture (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
- 14.M. Le Baron Kervyn de Lettenhove (1890) Relations Politiques des Pays-bas et de l’Angleterre, sous le Régne de Philippe II (Brussels: F. Hayez).Google Scholar
- 22.Conyers Read (1926) Mr Secretary Walsingham and the Policy of Queen Elizabeth, 3 vols (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
- 29.Johann Tritheimius (1606) Clauis generalis triplex in libro steganograhpicos Iohannis Trithemii (Darmstadt: Balthasar Hofmann).Google Scholar
- 31.Charles J. Mendelsohn (1940) ‘Biais de Vigenére and the “Chiffre Carré’”, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 82/2, 103–29 (p.120).Google Scholar
- 55.On medieval and Renaissance books of secrets see William Eamon (1994) Science and the Secrets of Nature: Books of Secrets in Medieval and Early Modem Culture (Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP).Google Scholar
- 93.Margaret Ferguson (1998) ‘The Authorial Ciphers of Aphra Behn’, in Steven N. Zwicker (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to English Literature, 1650–1740 (Cambridge: CUP), pp.225-49 (p.227).Google Scholar
- 99.Madeleine Foisil (1989) ‘The Literature of Intimacy’, in Roger Chartier (ed.) History of Private Life: III. Passions of the Renaissance (Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP), pp.327-61 (p.352).Google Scholar
- 112.Helen Wilcox (1992) ‘Private Writing and Public Function: Autobiographical Texts by Renaissance Englishwomen’, in S.P. Cerasano and Marion Wynne Davies (eds), Gloriana’s Face: Women, Public and Private in the English Renaissance (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester), pp.47-62 (p.47).Google Scholar
- 143.Daybell (2011) ‘Women, News and Intelligence Networks in Elizabethan England’, in Robyn Adams and Rosanna Cox (eds) Diplomacy and Early Modern Culture (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp.101-19 (pp.111-13).Google Scholar