Advertisement

Postal Conditions

  • James Daybell
Chapter
Part of the Early Modern Literature in History book series (EMLH)

Abstract

This chapter examines the peculiarities of early modern postal conditions in the period before the postal reforms of Charles I. It focuses on the underlying physical structures upon which postal networks rested, the differing postal modes utilised, and the mechanics, practices and nature of dispatch. Examination of these different aspects of letter delivery raises interesting questions about the speed, efficiency, cost and ultimately the security of postal arrangements. A fundamental argument underpinning the whole book is that one of the distinctive features of letter-writing throughout the period was the un-systematised, idiosyncratic character of the postal conditions, which shaped the very nature of the letter. Charles I’s 1635 proclamation for the ‘setling of the letter office of England and Scotland’ transformed the epistolary medium, opening up the royal post to private mail. Hitherto, royal postal networks were largely inaccessible for the majority of the population who relied on more traditional forms of conveyance. ‘Private’ letters were dispatched in an ad hoc manner: they were delivered by personal servants, entrusted to merchants and chance travellers; conveyed by carriers and foot-posts. Analysis of methods of delivery reveals the complexity of postal arrangements, the degree to which postal modes overlapped and interlocked. Official government correspondence could be sent by royal post and through diplomatic and ambassadorial channels; state officials could employ royal pursuivants, but also simultaneously utilised personal servants and carriers for other seemingly business-related correspondence. The boundaries between state and personal or private mail are thus extremely fluid. In practice correspondents used various methods for conveying correspondence depending on timing, circumstance and urgency. Thus, Lord President of Munster, Sir George Carew, in August 1602 informed Robert Cecil‘The last I wrote unto you was by a man of Sir Edward Wyngfeld’s, called Bacon … The 13th of July and the 20th of the same I sent your Honour two other pacquets, the one by a servant of my own, the other by an ordinary passenger to Brystowe, from thence by the running post [royal standing posts] to the Court’.1

Keywords

Postal Condition Standing Post Seventeenth Century Sixteenth Century Personal Servant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 3.
    Daybell (2001) ‘The Social Conventions of Women’s Letter-Writing in England, 1540–1603’, in Daybell (ed.) Early Modem Women’s Letter-Writing in England, 1450–1700 (Basingstoke: Palgrave), pp.59-76.Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    Quoted in A.S. Osley (1980) Scribes and Sources: Handbook of the Chancery Hand in the Sixteenth Century: Texts From The Writing Masters (Boston, MA: Godine), p.29.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    Jonathan Goldberg (1990) Writing Matter: From the Hands of the English Renaissance (Stanford, CA: Stanford UP), p.113.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    Seth Lerer (1997) Courtly Letters in the Age of Henry VIII: Literary Culture and the Arts of Deceit (Cambridge: CUP), p.88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 11.
    A.G.R. Smith (1968) ‘The Secretariats of the Cecils, circa 1580–1612’, EHR, 83, 481–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 13.
    Florence M.G. Evans (1923) The Principal Secretary of State: A Survey of the Office From 1558 to 1680 (Manchester: U of Manchester P), pp.168-73Google Scholar
  7. A.E.B. Owen (1973) ‘Sir John Wolley’s Letter-Book as Latin Secretary to Elizabeth I’, Archives 11/49, 16–18.Google Scholar
  8. 14.
    BL, Add. MS, 35840, Royal MS, 13 B.I: Roger Ascham’s Latin Letter-Books, 1554–1568; Robert Thomas Fallon (1989) ‘Milton in Government: Denmark and Savoy’, Milton Quarterly, 23, 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 17.
    Hilary Jenkinson (1922) ‘Elizabethan Handwriting: A Preliminary Sketch’, The Library, 3, 1–35 (p.23).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 31.
    Keith Thomas (1986) ‘The Meaning of Literacy in Early Modern England’, in Gerd Baumann (ed.) The Written Word: Literacy in Transition, Wolfson College Lectures 1985 (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp.97-131 (p.117); Daybell, Women Letter-Writers, pp.99-100.Google Scholar
  11. 35.
    Christopher Burlinson and Andrew Zurcher (2005) ‘“Secretary to the Lord Grey Lord Deputie here”: Edmund Spenser’s Irish Papers’, The Library, 6/1, 30–75 (pp.32-41).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 40.
    Jonathan Goldberg (1988) ‘Hamlet’s Hand’, SQ, 39/3, 307–27 (p.316).Google Scholar
  13. 42.
    BL, Harl. MS, 7003, fol.146, n.d. Cf. Steen (1988) ‘Fashioning an Acceptable Self: Arbella Stuart’, ELR, 18, 78–95 (p.93).Google Scholar
  14. 43.
    Tom Davis (1992) ‘The Analysis of Handwriting: An Introductory Survey’ in Peter Davison (ed.) The Book Encompassed: Studies in Twentieth-Century Bibliography (Cambridge: CUP), pp.57-68 (p.68).Google Scholar
  15. 78.
    BL, Eg. MS, 2584, 16/5/1626. Paul J. Rylands (1911) ‘Merchants’ Marks and Other Mediaeval Personal Marks’, Transactions of the Historic Society of Lancashire and Cheshire, 62, 1–34Google Scholar
  16. Charles Sisson (1928) ‘Marks as Signatures’, The Library, 91, 1–34; Thomas, ‘Meaning of Literacy’, pp. 100–02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 82.
    Michèle Margetts (1997) ‘“The wayes of mine owne hart”: The Dating and Mind Frame of Essex’s “fantasticall” letter’, Bodleian Library Record, 16/1, 101–10 (p.101).Google Scholar
  18. 85.
    David Stevenson (1984) ‘Masonry, Symbolism and Ethics in the Life of Sir Robert Moray, F.R.S’, Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, 114, 405–31 (p.410); Lady Falkland: Life and Letters, p.33.Google Scholar
  19. 120.
    Nancy Pollard Brown (1989) ‘Paperchase: The Dissemination of Catholic Texts in Elizabethan England’, EMS, 1, 120–44.Google Scholar
  20. 133.
    Edinburgh University MS De 1.12/9: 26/1/1596; Steven W. May (2004) Queen Elizabeth I: Selected Works (New York: Washington Square Press), p.242 (20/8/1602).Google Scholar
  21. 155.
    Jason Powell (2007) ‘Thomas Wyatt’s Ivy Seal’, N&tQ, 54/3, 242–4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© James Daybell 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Daybell
    • 1
  1. 1.Plymouth UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations