Advertisement

Interpreting Materiality and Social Signs

  • James Daybell
Part of the Early Modern Literature in History book series (EMLH)

Abstract

While the previous two chapters were concerned with materials, tools and technologies of letter-writing, this chapter concentrates on investigating the meanings attached to distinct physical characteristics and attributes of letters, paying particular attention to the social signs, codes and cues inscribed materially within the form. Several scholars including A.R. Braunmuller and Jonathan Gibson among others have drawn attention to the material meanings of early modern English letters, especially as they relate to the problems of editing. Building on this initial work the present chapter, which is based on the examination of well over 10,000 manuscript letters, offers a detailed examination of the social significance of a complex range of physical aspects of early modern correspondence.1 It considers a broad cross-section of letter-writers from elite and non-elite backgrounds, mercantile and professional groups, men as well as women, and by writers of different generations, children as well as adults. In addition it analyses varying types or categories of letters, including formal petitions, official correspondence, love letters, letters of condolence, familiar or private letters. It thus broadly examines how the physical forms of the English letter changed over the period, considering the impact of social status and gender and codes of deference and humility, as well as the form, function and material conditions of writing.

Keywords

Seventeenth Century Social Sign Blank Space Material Letter Hand Corner 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    David Cressy (1980) Literacy and the Social Order: Reading and Writing in Tudor and Stuart England (Cambridge: CUP), pp.20-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 6.
    Joan Simon (1966) Education and Society in Tudor England (Cambridge: CUP), p.353.Google Scholar
  3. 17.
    Gary R. Grund (1975) ‘From Formulary to Fiction: The Epistle and the English Anti-Ciceronian Movement’, Texas Studies in Literature and Language, 17/2, 379–95 (pp.381-4).Google Scholar
  4. 23.
    Nicholas Orme (2001) Medieval Children (New Haven and London: Yale UP), p.338.Google Scholar
  5. 43.
    This echoes Walter J. Ong (1986) ‘Writing is a Technology that Restructures Thought’, in Gerd Baumann (ed.) The Written Word: Literacy in Transition, Wolfson College Lectures 1985 (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp.23-50.Google Scholar
  6. 59.
    Jonathan Gibson (2000) ‘Letters’ in Michael Hattaway (ed.) A Companion to English Renaissance Literature and Culture (Oxford: Blackwell), pp.615-19.Google Scholar
  7. 66.
    Henderson (1993) ‘On Reading the Rhetoric of the Renaissance Letter’, in Heinrich F. Plett (ed.) Renaissance-Rhetorik/Renaissance Rhetoric (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), pp.143-62 (pp.149; 151).Google Scholar
  8. 68.
    Ralph A. Houlbrooke (1984) The English Family, 1450–1700 (Harlow: Longman), pp.32-3.Google Scholar
  9. 72.
    Elbert N.S. Thompson (1924) ‘Familiar Letters’, in Literary Bypaths of the Renaissance (New Haven: Yale UP), pp.91-126.Google Scholar
  10. 85.
    Dorothy Gardiner (1929) English Girlhood at School: A Study of Women’s Education Through Twelve Centuries (Oxford: OUP), p.63.Google Scholar
  11. 92.
    Roderick Lyall (1996) ‘The Construction of a Rhetorical Voice in Sixteenth-Century Scottish Letters’, Prose Studies, 19/2, 127–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 119.
    A.G.R. Smith (1968) ‘The Secretariats of the Cecils, circa 1580–1612’, EHR, 83, 481–504 (pp.486-8).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 122.
    Heather Hirshfield (2001) ‘Early Modern Collaboration and Theories of Authorship’, PMLA, 116/3, 609–22.Google Scholar
  14. 141.
    James Heywood Markland (1838) ‘Instructions by Henry Percy, ninth Earl of Northumberland, to his son Algernon Percy, touching the management of his Estate, Officers, &c. written during his confinement in the Tower’, Archaeologia, 27, 306–58 (p.348).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© James Daybell 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Daybell
    • 1
  1. 1.Plymouth UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations