Abstract
The overall aim of this chapter is to discuss and deepen methodological and ethical aspects of gendered interaction in cross-gendered interviews in the field of masculinity studies. Its point of departure is a study of profeminist men in Sweden, where the power relations turned out to be of subtle character and all but one-way authoritarian (Egeberg Holmgren, 2011b). The aim of the study was to understand how young adult men1 come to call themselves feminists2; what it meant for them (somehow being ‘the second sex’ of the feminist movement); how feminism affected their relations at work and at home; and how feminism was ‘done’ in their everyday lives in a Swedish society that embraces gender-equality politics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alvesson, M. and K. Sköldberg (2008) Tolkning och Reflektion: Vetenskapsfilosofi och Kvalitativ Metod [Interpretation and Reflection: Philosophy of Science and Qualitative Method] (Lund: Studentlitteratur).
Ashe, F. (2004) ‘Deconstructing the Experiential Bar: Male Experience and Feminist Resistance’, Men and Masculinities, 7, 187–204.
Brickell, C. (2005) ‘Masculinities, Performativity, and Subversion: A Sociological Reappraisal’, Men and Masculinities, 8, 24–43.
Brickell, C. (2006) ‘The Sociological Construction of Gender and Sexuality’, The Sociological Review, 54, 87–113.
Clarke, A.E. (2005) Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications).
Collinson, D. and J. Hearn (1994) ‘Naming Men as Men: Implications for Work, Organization and Management’, Gender, Work and Organization, 1, 2–22.
Connell, R. (1995) Masculinities (Berkeley: University of California Press).
Connell, R. (2000) The Men and the Boys (Cambridge: Polity).
Digby, T. (ed.) (1998) Men Doing Feminism (New York: Routledge).
Egeberg Holmgren, L. (2007) ‘Killing Bill: Men as Rebellious Feminists in the Politics of Passing’, Nordic Journal of Masculinity Studies, 2, 16–37.
Egeberg Holmgren, L. (2008) ‘Performing Feminist Affinity: Interviewing Feminist Men in Sweden’ Atenea, XXVIII, 107–120.
Egeberg Holmgren, L. (2011a) ‘Cofielding in Qualitative Interviews: Gender, Knowledge, and Interaction in a Study of (Pro)Feminist Men’ Qualitative Inquiry, 17, 364–378.
Egeberg Holmgren, L. (2011b) Ingenmansland: Om Män som Feminister, Intervjuframträdanden och Passerandets Politik [No Man’s Land: Men as Feminists, Interview Performances and the Politics of Passing] (Uppsala: Universitetsförlaget).
Egeberg Holmgren, L. (2012) ‘Feministiska Män: Från i-Princip till i-Praktik’ [‘Feminist Men: From Principle to Practice’] in L. Gottzén and R. Jonsson (eds) Andra Män: Maskuliniteter och Normskapande i det Jämställda’ Sverige [Other Men: Masculinity, Normativity and Gender Equality] (Malmö: Gleerups).
Egeberg Holmgren, L. and J. Hearn (2009) ‘Framing “Men in Feminism”: Theoretical Locations, Local Contexts and Practical Passings in Men’s Gender-Conscious Positionings on Gender Equality and Feminism’, Journal of Gender Studies, 18, 403–418.
Fernqvist, S. (2013) En Erfarenhet Rikare? En Kvalitativ Studie av Barns Strategier och Barnfattigdomens Villkor i Välfärdsstaten [Rich in Experience? A Qualitative Study of Children’s Strategies and the Conditions of Child Poverty in the Welfare State] (Uppsala: Universitetsförlaget).
Fine, M. (1994) ‘Working the Hyphens: Reinventing Self and Other in Qualitative Research’ in N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
Fine, M. and S.R. Sirin (2007) ‘Theorizing Hyphenated Selves: Researching Youth Development in and Across Contentious Political Contexts’, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 16–38.
Goffman, E. (1990 [1959]) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (London: Penguin).
Green, A.I. (2007) ‘Queer Theory and Sociology: Locating the Subject and the Self in Sexuality Studies’, Sociological Theory, 25, 26–45.
Holstein, J.A. and J.F. Gubrium (2004) ‘The Active Interview’ in D. Silverman (ed.) Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, 2nd edn (London: Sage).
Jardine, A. and P. Smith (eds) (1989) Men in Feminism (London: Routledge).
Josselson, R. (2004) ‘The Hermeneutics of Faith and the Hermeneutics of Suspicion’, Narrative Inquiry, 14, 1–29.
Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2008) ‘A Social Constructionist Framing of the Research Interview’ in J.A. Holstein and J.F. Gubrium (eds) Handbook of Constructionist Research (New York and London: The Guildford Press).
Lundgren, E. (2000) ‘Ahead of Their Time, Children of Their Time, In and Out of Step 20 Years Later’, Feminism and Psychology, 10, 55–61.
Newton, J. and J. Stacey (1995) ‘Ms. Representations: Reflections on Studying Academic Men’ in R. Behar and D.A. Gordon (eds) Women Writing Culture (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
Newton, J. and J. Stacey (1997) ‘The Men We Left Behind Us: Narratives Around and About Feminism from White, Left-Wing, Academic Men’ in E. Long (ed.) From Sociology to Cultural Studies: New Perspectives (Oxford: Blackwell).
Nietzsche, F. (2003 [1887]) The Genealogy of Morals (Mineola, NY: Dover).
Pease, B. (2000) Recreating Men: Postmodern Masculinity Politics (London: Sage).
Pini, B. (2005) ‘Interviewing Men: Gender and the Collection and Interpretation of Qualitative Data’, Journal of Sociology, 41, 201–216.
Schacht, S.P. and D.W. Ewing (eds) (1998) Feminism and Men: Reconstructing Gender Relations (New York: New York University Press).
Smith, D.E. (2002) ‘Foreword’ in S. Fenstermaker and C. West (eds) Doing Gender, Doing Difference: Inequality, Power and Institutional Change (New York: Routledge).
Sohl, L. (2009) ‘The Only Way is Up? Narrative and Discursive Reflections on Women’s Narratives of Class Mobility in Sweden’, Paper Presented at the 9th Conference of the European Sociological Association, Lisbon, 2–5 September.
West, C. and D.H. Zimmerman (1987) ‘Doing Gender’, Gender and Society, 1, 125–151.
Winchester, H.P.M. (1996) ‘Ethical Issues in Interviewing as a Research Method in Human Geography’, Australian Geographer, 27, 117–131.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Linn Egeberg Holmgren
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Holmgren, L.E. (2013). Gendered Selves, Gendered Subjects: Interview Performances and Situational Contexts in Critical Interview Studies of Men and Masculinities. In: Pini, B., Pease, B. (eds) Men, Masculinities and Methodologies. Genders and Sexualities in the Social Sciences. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137005731_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137005731_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43483-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-00573-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)