Abstract
In the past few decades, the philosophy of technology has shifted from its ‘classical’ approach (focusing on how technology as a whole negatively affects society at large, and even the human condition) to a more empirical approach focusing on objects themselves (Brey 2010). Now philosophers are becoming more and more interested in the way concrete objects are designed in the laboratory in order to scrutinise how objects materialise norms and values, and introduce them into society. Philosophers of technology have shifted from their usual observation posture to a more active one; in other words, they have to more actively intervene in the design of technologies—they have to become fully-fledged actors of engineering processes. What about their traditional role as critics of current social organisation, and of its admitted set of norms and values? Are they in danger of losing their vigilance, which requires a certain ‘distance’? Is the social role of philosophy now limited to ‘accompanying’ science and technology, and to providing an expertise for engineers and science policy-makers? This perspective is obviously unsatisfactory and raises the question of the role of philosophy when philosophers have to face such demands.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brey, P. (2010) ‘Philosophy of Technology after the Empirical Turn’, Techné: Research in Philosophy of Technology, 14: 1.
Dewey, J. (1939) Theory of Valuation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Hiratsuka, Y. and alii (2006) ‘A Microrotary Motor Powered by Bacteria’, PNAS, 103(37): 13618–23.
Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1993) Gesture and Speech (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Manders-Huits, N. (2011) ‘What Values in Design? The Challenge of Incorporation Moral Values into Design’, Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(2): 271–87.
Nascimento, S. and Polvora, A. (2011) ‘Towards the Participation of Social Sciences and Humanities in the Practical Realms of Technology’, The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 7(2): 61–72.
Rabinow, P., and Bennett, G. (2007) From Bio-Ethics to Human Practices: Assembling Contemporary Equipment (Cambridge, MA: Daedalus).
Rip, A. (2009) ‘Technology as Prospective Ontology’, Synthese, 168: 405–22.
Schot, J. and Rip, A. (1996) ‘The Past and Future of Constructive Technology Assessment’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 54: 251–68.
Venter, C. and alii (2010) ‘Creation of a Bacterial Cell Controlled by a Chemically Synthesized Genome’, Science, 329(5987): 52–6.
Verbeek, P. (2007) ‘Design Ethics and the Morality of Technological Artifacts’, in Vermaas, P. E. and alii (eds) Philosophy and Design: From Engineering to Architecture (Dordrecht: Springer).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Xavier Guchet
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Guchet, X. (2013). Ethics on the Basis of Technological Choices. In: van der Burg, S., Swierstra, T. (eds) Ethics on the Laboratory Floor. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137002938_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137002938_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43407-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-00293-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)