Advertisement

Philosophy in the Seraglio: Orientalism and the Enlightenment

Chapter
  • 176 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Cultural and Intellectual History book series (CIH)

Abstract

Facing Europe along the southern and eastern shores of the Mediterranean and at times reaching into the corners of Europe itself, the Islamic Orient has long been the West’s most enduring Other and its most persistent point of reference for meditation upon the meaning of cultural difference. Relations between Christendom and the Islamic world have often been characterized by mutual hostility, as Muslim control over the Christian holy places outraged devout believers, while Muslim domination of the Iberian and Balkan peninsulas was perceived by some Europeans as a mortal threat to Western Christian civilization. It would, of course, be a gross error to suggest that relations between Christian Europeans and Near Eastern Muslims have always been marked by hostility and warfare; on the contrary, important patterns of cultural interchange and maritime commerce arose in the late medieval and early modern periods, integrating the seafaring Italian republics of Venice and Genoa as well as French Mediterranean ports such as Marseille and Toulon into an emerging world economic system. As a result of these contacts, Near Eastern Muslims were far more familiar to early modern Europeans than were Chinese, Native Americans, Pacific islanders, or other peoples who, as we shall see in the following chapters, offered grist for the mill of Enlightenment theories on the nature of man and the fundamental principles of human society.

Keywords

Eighteenth Century Islamic World Early Modern Period Oriental Language Religious Intolerance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Thomas Kaiser, “The Evil Empire? The Debate on Turkish Despotism in Eighteenth-Century French Political Culture,” The Journal of Modern History 72:1 (2000), 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    For these contacts, see Ian Coller, “East of Enlightenment: Regulating Cosmopolitanism between Istanbul and Paris in the Eighteenth Century,” Journal of World History 21:3 (2010), 447–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Robert Darnton, The Great Cat Massacre and Other Episodes in French Cultural History (New York: Vintage, 1985), 89.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Jean Chardin, Sir John Chardin’s Travels in Persia, ed. Sir Percy Sykes (1686; repr. London: The Argonaut Press, 1927), 125; François Bernier, Evénemens particuliers, ou ce qui s’est passé de plus considérable après la guerre pendant cinq ans, ou environ, dans les Etats du Grand Mogol (Paris : Claude Barbin, 1670), 2:248.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    Henry Laurens, Aux sources de l’orientalisme : La Bibliothèque Orientale de Barthélemy d’Herbelot (Paris: Maisonneuve et Larose, 1978), 25.Google Scholar
  6. 10.
    Voltaire , Essai sur les moeurs et l’esprit des nations (1756; repr., Paris: Gamier Frères, 1963), 1:196, 1:55.Google Scholar
  7. 11.
    Voltaire’s anti-Semitism is a complex and much-debated topic. For a harsh view, see Arthur Hertzberg, The French Enlightenment and the Jews (New York: Columbia University Press, 1968);Google Scholar
  8. and Léon Poliakov, The Aryan Myth: A History of Racist and Nationalist Ideas in Europe (New York: Basic Books, 1971), both of whom condemn Voltaire as an anti-Semite.Google Scholar
  9. For the argument that Voltaire’s diatribes against the Jews reflect his rejection of Christian monotheism and intolerance, see Peter Gay, The Party of Humanity (New York: Norton, 1971).Google Scholar
  10. For a more recent and balanced view, see Ronald Schechter, Obstinate Hebrews: Representations of Jews in France, 1715–1815 (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2003).Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    Edward W. Said, Orientalism (New York: Vintage, 1979), 3.Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    Henry Laurens, Les origines intellectuelles de l’expédition d’Egypte: L’Orientalisme islamisant en France (1698–1798) (Paris and Istanbul: Editions Isis, 1987), 2.Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    Nicholas Dew, Orientalism in Louis XIV’s France (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2009), 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 16.
    Charles Sécondat de Montesquieu, tr. Anne Kohler, The Spirit of the Laws (1749; repr., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 235.Google Scholar
  15. 18.
    Robert Irwin, Dangerous Knowledge: Orientalism and Its Discontents (Woodstock, NY: The Overlook Press, 2008), 76, 82–83.Google Scholar
  16. 20.
    Cited in Laurens, Aux sources de l’orientalisme, 7. For Racine’s role as royal historiographer, and the origins of historical scholarship in the France of Louis XIV, see Orest Ranum, Artisans of Glory: Writers and Historical Thought in Seventeenth-Century France (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1980).Google Scholar
  17. 23.
    Anthony Grafton, “Joseph Scaliger and Historical Chronology: The Rise and Fall of a Discipline,” History and Theory 14:2 (1975), 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 32.
    Voltaire, Zaire [1732], in Œuvres complètes de Voltaire, ed. Louis Moland, (Paris, 1877).Google Scholar
  19. 35.
    On this point, see Magdy Gabriel Badir, Voltaire et l’Islam (Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century), Vol. CXXV (Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 1974), 127.Google Scholar
  20. 40.
    Chardin, Chardin’s Travels, 139. See also Stephen F. Dale, The Muslim Empires of the Ottomans, Safavids, and Mughals (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 124.Google Scholar
  21. 41.
    Charles-Louis de Sécondat, baron de Montesquieu, Jacques Roger ed., Lettres persanes (1721; repr., Paris: Garnier-Flammarion, 1964), 143.Google Scholar
  22. 43.
    For an overview of the Enlightenment discourse on “Oriental despotism,” see Franco Venturi, “Oriental Despotism,” Journal of the History of Ideas 24:1 (1963), 133–142;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. and Thomas A. Kaiser, “The Evil Empire? The Debate on Turkish Despotism in Eighteenth-Century French Political Culture,” The Journal of Modern History 72:1 (2006), 6–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. For Montesquieu’s indebtedness to early modern travel literature, see David Young, “Montesquieu’s View of Despotism and His Use of Travel Literature,” The Review of Politics 40:3 (1978), 392–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. For a recent critique of Eurocentric biases in the construction of Oriental despotism, see Ash Çirakman, “From Tyranny to Despotism: The Enlightenment’s Unenlightened Image of the Turks,” International Journal of Middle East Studies 33:1 (2001), 49–68.Google Scholar
  26. 55.
    For the ancient roots of the climate theory, see Benjamin Isaac, The Invention of Racism in Classical Antiquity (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004), especially 56–82.Google Scholar
  27. 57.
    Anne-Robert-Jacques Turgot, “Recherches sur les causes des progrès et de la decadence des sciences et des arts,” in Oeuvres, ed. Gustave Schelle (Paris: Felix Alcan, 1913), 1:120.Google Scholar
  28. 58.
    Hans Wolpe, Histoire des deux Indes (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1957), 1:63.Google Scholar
  29. 68.
    Diana J. Schaub, Erotic Liberalism: Women and Revolution in Montesquieu’s Persian Letters (Boston, MA: Rowman and Littlefield, 1995), 17.Google Scholar
  30. 70.
    Cited in Fatma Göçek, East Encounters West: France and the Ottoman Empire in the Eighteenth Century (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1987), 45.Google Scholar
  31. 72.
    François de Tott, Memoirs of Baron de Tott, ed. John E. Woods, (1785; repr., New York: Arno Press, 1973), 1: 13, 74.Google Scholar
  32. 76.
    Information on Anquetil-Duperron’s life is taken from Raymond Schwab, La Renaissance orientale (Paris: Payot, 1950),Google Scholar
  33. and Abraham-Hyacinthe Anquetil-Duperron, Voyage en Inde 1754–1762: Relation du voyage en preliminaire à la traduction du Zend-Avesta (1771; repr., Cahors: Maisonneuve et Larose, 1997).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© David Allen Harvey 2012

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations