Skip to main content

Reflections on Insiders and Outsiders

  • Chapter
At the Edges of Liberalism
  • 138 Accesses

Abstract

The task of this chapter is to provide some kind of a general conceptual and historical framework for thinking about the categories of “insiders” and “outsiders” and for rendering explicit some of the assumptions and problems regarding these notions that usually remain implicit in treatments of this subject.1 This is no easy assignment, for it would appear that “insiders” and “outsiders” are universal organizing categories. Societies, cultures, and individual as well as collective identities are constituted and function by dint of the fluid dynamics of inclusion and exclusion, by defining the conditions and content of “normalcy” and “abnormalcy,” by openly or tacitly invoking conditions of belonging and nonbelonging, through the setting up of often ironically unstable and permeable exits and entrances.2 For every in-group there will be those who are without, excluded.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. This piece, slightly revised in the present version, was originally written as the introduction to a volume (in honor of Ezra Mendelsohn), dedicated to an exploration of “insiders” and “outsiders” in modern East European Jewish history. See Richard I. Cohen, Jonathan Frankel, and Stefani Hoffman, eds., Insiders and Outsiders: Dilemmas of East European Jewry (Oxford: Littman Library of Jewish Civilization, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  2. The classic work by Mary Douglas, Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1966), remains one of the most insightful general approaches to the question.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. See William Ian Miller, The Anatomy of Disgust (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997), p. 235. In the chapter in the present book, “The Ambiguous Political Economy of Empathy,” I provide a somewhat different perspective on the problem.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Gershom Scholem, Sabbatai Sevi: The Mystical Messiah, translated by R. J. Zwi Werblowsky (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1973);

    Google Scholar 

  5. also Pawel Maciejko, The Mixed Multitude: Jacob Frank and the Frankist Movement, 1755–1816 (Philadephia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Shulamit Volkov’s “Excursus on Minorities in the Nation-State” in her Germans, Jews, and Antisemites: Trials in Emancipation (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006), Chapter 8.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. See Simmel’s “The Stranger” in The Sociology of Georg Simmel, ed., Kurt H. Wolff (New York: Macmillan, 1950), pp. 402–408.

    Google Scholar 

  8. For a provocative discussion of these issues in general, and with regard to matters Jewish in particular, see Michael P. Steinberg’s impassioned plea against essentializing conceptions in his Judaism Musical and Unmusical (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  9. For an interesting analysis of this condition see Rael Meyerowitz, Transferring to America: Jewish Interpretations of American Dreams (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1995), especially pp. 262–263.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See the introduction to David Biale, Michael Galchinsky, and Susan Heschel, eds., Insider/Outsider: American Jews and Multiculturalism (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See especially Mosse’s Nationalism and Sexuality: Respectability and Abnormal Sexuality in Modern Europe (New York: Howard Fertig, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Peter Gay, Weimar Culture: The Outsider as Insider (New York: Harper & Row, 1970), p. xiv.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See, most prominently, George L. Mosse’s German Jews Beyond Judaism (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  14. For a more popular treatment, see Frederic V. Grunfeld, Prophets without Honour: A Background to Freud, Kafka, Einstein and Their World (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Strauss’ preface to the English translation of his Spinoza’s Critique of Religion (New York: Schocken Books, 1965), p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thus Freud to members of the Viennese B’nai Brith, May 6, 1926. Quoted in Peter Gay, A Godless Jew: Freud, Atheism, and the Making of Psychoanalysis (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1987), p. 137.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leszek Kolakowski, “In Praise of Exile” in his Modernity on Endless Trial (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1990), pp. 56–57.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See Edward W. Said, Freud and the Non-European (London: Verso, 2003). The quotes are from p. 16 and p. 54 respectively. I am fully aware of the highly ideological and political charge contained in Said’s book. I am using this piece agnostically and as yet another example of the ways in which Jewish intellectuality, dual outsiderdom, and a certain cosmopolitanism have been linked. In critiquing Said’s advocacy of the non-Jewish Jew, a rather outraged Leon Wieseltier asks, “then why not the non-Palestinian Palestinian?” See his piece entitled “The Ego and the Yid,” The New Republic, April 7, 2003, p. 38. Said and Wieseltier represent diametrical opposites. The former insists upon denying and opposing “essentialized” identity while Wieseltier writes: “The Jews are not Europeans and they are not non-Europeans. They are Jews, an autonomous people with an autonomous history that had directed them, in different times and in different places, against their will and according to their will, toward certain peoples and away from certain peoples.” But for “outsiders” both “non-essentialist” and “autonomist” assumptions may be problematic and their choices in practice more gray, and less stark.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Michael Walzer, Interpretation and Social Criticism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987), Chapter 2, “The Practice of Social Criticism,” especially pp. 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  20. For a sensitive philosophical and historical treatment of these questions in general, see Jerzy Jedlicki, “Heritage and Collective Responsibility,” in Ian Maclean, Alan Montefiore, Peter Winch, eds., The Political Responsibility of Intellectuals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2012 Steven E. Aschheim

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aschheim, S.E. (2012). Reflections on Insiders and Outsiders. In: At the Edges of Liberalism. Palgrave Studies in Cultural and Intellectual History. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137002297_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137002297_12

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-00228-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-00229-7

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics