Abstract
There is a paradox at the core of the debate on Islam and democracy, which democratic theorists have generally ignored. The paradox is that modern liberal democracy requires a form of secularism to sustain itself, yet simultaneously the primary intellectual, cultural, and political resources at the disposal of Muslim democrats are theological. Reconciling this tension is critical to advancing a democratic theory for Muslim societies today.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
John Locke, Two Treatises of Government, ed. Peter Laslett (Cambridge, UK, 1988); Jean-Jacques Rousseau, On the Social Contract, trans. Donald Cress (Indianapolis, IN, 1987)
John Stuart Mill, On Liberty, ed. Gertrude Himmelfarb (New York, 1974).
Benjamin Constant, Constant: Political Writings, ed. Biancamaria Fontana (Cambridge, UK, 1988), 307–328.
On procedural democracy see Joseph Schumpeter’s discussion of “Another Theory of Democracy,” in Joseph Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (New York, 1950), 269–283.
Joshua Cohen, “Deliberative Democracy and Democratic Legitimacy,” in Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, ed. James Bohman and William Rehg (Cambridge, MA, 1997), 67–92.
Charles Taylor, “Modes of Secularism,” in Secularism and Its Critics, ed. Rajeev Bhargava (New Delhi, 1998), 31.
Emmet Kennedy, Secularism and Its Opponents from Augustine to Solzhenitsyn (New York, 2006), 10–180
Steve Bruce, God Is Dead: Secularization in the West (Oxford, UK, 2002), 1–44
David Martin, A General Theory of Secularization (Oxford, UK, 1978), 12–99
Robert Bellah, Beyond Belief: Essays on Religion in a Post-traditionalist World (Berkeley, CA, 1991), 20–50
Pippa Norris and Ronald Inglehart, Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide (Cambridge, UK, 2004), 3–32
Talal Asad, Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity (Stanford, CA, 2003), 21–66.
Nader Hashemi, “The Multiple Histories of Secularism: Muslim Societies in Comparative Perspective,” Journal of Philosophy and Social Criticism, 36/3–4 (2010):325–338.
Bernard Lewis, What Went Wrong?: Western Impact and Middle Eastern Response (New York, 2003), 96–116
Samuel Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remarking of World Order (New York, 1996), 56–78, 207–218
Gabriel Almond and G. Bingham Powell, Comparative Politics: A Development Approach (Boston: Little Brown, 1966)
Donald Smith, ed., Religion and Modernization (New Haven, CT, 1974)
Samuel P. Huntington, “Will Countries Become More Democratic?” Political Science Quarterly, 99 (Summer 1984): 193–218
John Waterbury, “Democracy Without Democrats?: The Potential for Political Liberalization in the Middle East,” in Democracy without Democrats: The Renewal of Politics in the Muslim World, ed. Ghassan Salamé (New York, 1994), 23–47.
Abdou Filali-Ansary, “The Challenge of Secularization,” in Islam and Democracy in the Middle East, ed. Larry Diamond, Marc Plattner, and Daniel Brumberg (Baltimore, MD, 2003), 235. Emphasis added.
Wolfhart Pannenberg, “How to Think about Secularism,” First Things 64 (June/July 1996): 27–32. Also, The Oxford History of Christianity, ed. John McManners (New York, 1993), 243–309.
Noel Malcolm, Aspects of Hobbes (New York, 2002), 23.
John Locke, A Letter Concerning Toleration, ed. James Tully (Indianapolis, IN, 1983), 26.
For more information, see Owen Chadwick, The Reformation (New York, 1990)
Alister McGrath, Reformation Thought: An Introduction (Oxford, UK, 1999).
Vali Nasr, “Secularism: Lessons from the Muslim World,” Daedalus 132 (Summer 2003): 68.
Marshall Hodgson, “Modernity and the Islamic Heritage,” in Marshall Hodgson, Rethinking World History: Essays on Europe, Islam, and World History, ed. Edmund Burke III (Cambridge, UK, 1993), 220.
L. Carl Brown, Religion and State: The Muslim Approach to Politics (New York, 2000), 137
Charles Issawi, “Why Japan?”, in Arab Resources: The Transformation of a Society, ed. Ibrahim Ibrahim (London, 1983), 283–300. Marshall Hodgson briefly explores this theme in the epilogue of The Venture of Islam: The Gunpowder Empires and Modern Times, vol. 3 (Chicago, 1974): 417–436.
John Rawls, Political Liberalism (New York, 1993), 133–172
Seymour Martin Lipset, “The Social Requisites of Democracy Revisited,” American Sociological Review 59 (February 1994): 1–22.
Robert Hefner, Civil Islam: Muslims and Democratization in Indonesia (Princeton, NJ, 2000), 12–13.
Ibid., 116–119; Greg Barton, “Islamic Liberalism and the Prospects for Democracy in Indonesia,” in Democracy in Asia, ed. Michele Schmiegelow (New York, 1997), 427–451
Greg Barton, Abdurrahman Wahid: Muslim Democrat, Indonesian President (Honolulu, 2002)
Greg Barton, “Indonesia’s Nurcholish Madjid and Abdurrahman Wahid as Intellectual Ulama: The Meeting of Islamic Traditionalism and Modernism in Neo-modernist thought,” Islam and Christian –Muslim Relations 8 (October 1997): 323–350.
Abdurrahman Wahid, “Indonesia’s Mild Secularism,” SAIS Review 21 (Summer-Fall 2001), 25–28.
M. Hakan Yavuz, Islamic Political Identity in Turkey (New York, 2003), 184.
Fethullah Gilen, “A Comparative Approach to Islam and Democracy,” SAIS Review 21 (Summer-Fall 2001): 134.
The declarations appear in the appendixes of M. Hakan Yavuz and John Esposito, Turkish Islam and the Secular State: The Gillen Movement (Syracuse, NY, 2003), 251–256.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Asma Afsaruddin
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hashemi, N. (2011). Rethinking the Relationship between Religion and Liberal Democracy: Overcoming the Problems of Secularism in Muslim Societies. In: Afsaruddin, A. (eds) Islam, the State, and Political Authority. Middle East Today. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137002020_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137002020_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-29720-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-00202-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)