Skip to main content

Stock Exchange Mergers in the Aftermath of the Crisis: New Insights

  • Chapter
Crisis, Risk and Stability in Financial Markets

Abstract

Securities exchanges play an important role in producing liquidity for securities and providing settings for efficient price discovery. Therefore, they fulfil a fundamental function in the flow of funds from savings to investments. Aside from this public function, demutualized exchanges (listed ones in particular) behave as profit-maximizing entities. Exchanges operate in an ever more competitive market in which it has become, particularly in the last 10 years, more difficult to retain the rents stemming from their traditional natural monopoly status. This was the main rationale for exchange demutualization (see, among others, Steil, 2002; Aggarwal, 2002). The incentive problem is also analysed in Serifsoy and Tyrell (2006) where it is shown how a mutual exchange, in the face of competition from a for-profit, outside-owned platform, can survive only by adopting a similar governance structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aggarwal, R. (2002). Demutualization and corporate governance of stock exchanges. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance. XV(1), 105–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aite Group (2009). ‘European trading venues vie for victory’, www.aitegroup.com. Andersén, A. (2005). Essays on stock exchange competition and pricing. Helsinki School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandes, Y. and Domowitz, I. (2010). ‘Alternative trading systems in Europe. Trading performance by European venues post-Mifid’, Investment Technology Group, www.itg.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cesr (2010). ‘Technical advice to the European Commission in the context of the Mifid review — Equity markets’, 10–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economides, N. (1993). Network economics with application to finance. Financial Markets Institutions and Instruments, II.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economides, N. and Flyer, F. (1997). Compatibility and market structure for network goods. Discussion Paper, EC-98–02 Stern School of Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleckner, A. M. (2006). Stock exchanges at the crossroads. Fordham Law Review. LXXIV, 2541–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S. J. and Hart, O. D. (1986). The costs and benefits of ownership: a theory of vertical integration. Journal of Political Economy. XCIV(4), 691–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polato, M. and Floreani, J. (2010). Measuring value in stock exchanges’ mergers. In R. Bottiglia, E. Gualandri and G. N. Mazzocco (eds), Consolidation in the European Financial Industry. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 182–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmiedel, H. (2001). Technological development and concentration of stock exchanges in Europe. Discussion Paper Bank of Finland, XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmiedel, H. (2002). Total factor productivity growth in European stock exchanges: a non parametric frontier approach. Discussion Paper Bank of Finland, XI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serifsoy, B. (2007). Stock exchange business models and their operative performance. Journal of Banking and Finance. XXXI(10), 2978–3012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serifsoy, B. and Tyrel, M. (2006). Investment behavior of stock exchanges and the rationale for demutualization — theory and empirical evidence. Wharton Financial Institutions Center. Working Paper, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steil, B. (2002). Changes in the ownership and governance of security exchanges: Causes and consequences. Wharton Financial Institutions Center. Working Paper, No. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shy, O. and Tarkka, J. (2001). Stock exchanges alliances, access fees and competition. Discussion Papers Bank of Finland, XXII.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabb Group (2009) ‘Trading in the dark in Europe: choice and complexity on the cusp of change’, www.tabbgroup.com.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Maurizio Polato and Josanco Floreani

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Polato, M., Floreani, J. (2013). Stock Exchange Mergers in the Aftermath of the Crisis: New Insights. In: de Guevara Radoselovics, J.F., Monsálvez, J.M.P. (eds) Crisis, Risk and Stability in Financial Markets. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137001832_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics