Advertisement

Financial Crisis and EU Banks’ Performance

  • Ted Lindblom
  • Magnus Willesson
Chapter
  • 418 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions book series (SBFI)

Abstract

The financial crisis at the end of the past decade clearly disclosed the vulnerability of globally interconnected financial systems in times of recession. Financial problems and failures on the US financial market in autumn 2008 almost immediately contaminated financial systems and institutions worldwide. The practical meaning of theoretically defined concepts like ‘systemic risk’ and particularly ‘counterparty risk’ and ‘liquidity risk’ became very apparent and real not only for banks and other financial institutions, but also for their customers and society as a whole. Risk premiums charged on money and capital markets were immediately increased up to levels that made refinancing on these markets extremely expensive. In many countries the financial system was more or less on the verge of collapse; without the rescue actions of central banks and governments, it is highly likely that a substantially larger number of banks would have entered into bankruptcy than actually did so. Lind-blom, Olsson and Willesson (2011) report that the guarantee programme introduced into the Swedish market had already been utilized from the start by domestic banks in general, and by one of the four large commercial banks in particular. In their study they find that this programme allowed the banks to operate without major constraints during the crisis and, hence, to perform rather well in their home market.

Keywords

Credit Risk Commercial Bank Saving Bank Liquidity Risk Interest Rate Risk 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alberts, W. A. (1989). A new look at calculating ROE, The Bank Magazine, 172, 37–42.Google Scholar
  2. Altunbas, Y., Carbó, S., Gardener, E. P. M. and Molyneux, P. (2007). Examining the relationships between capital, risk and efficiency in European banking. European Financial Management. 13(1), 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berger, A. N. (2007). International comparisons of banking efficiency. Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments. 16(3), 119–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger, A. N. and Bouwman, C. H. S. (2011). How does capital affect bank performance during financial crises? Research paper 11–12, Financial Institutions Center, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  5. Berger, A. N. and Humphrey, D. B. (1994). Bank scale economies, mergers, concentration, and efficiency: the U.S. experience, Research paper 94–25, Financial Institutions Center, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  6. Bos, J. and Schmiedel, H. (2007). Is there a single frontier in a single European market? Journal of Banking and Finance. 31, 2081–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carbó, S., Humphrey, D., Maudos, J. and Molyneux, P. (2009). Cross-country comparisons of competition and pricing power in European banking. Journal of International Money and Finance. 28(1), 115–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Claessens, S., Demirgüç-Kunt, A. and Huizinga, H. (2001). How does foreign entry affect domestic banking markets? Journal of Banking and Finance. 25, 891–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Demirgüç-Kunt, A., and Huizinga, H. (1998). Determinants of commercial bank interest margins and profitability. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 1900.Google Scholar
  10. Diamond, D. W. and Rajan, R. G. (2000). A theory of bank capital. Journal of Finance. 55(6), 2431–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frazer D. R., and Zhang, H. (2009). Mergers and long-term corporate performance: evidence from cross-border bank acquisitions. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 41(7), 1503–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. García-Herrero, A., Gavilá, S. and Santabárbara, D. (2009). What explains the low profitability of Chinese banks? Journal of Banking and Finance. 33(11), 2080–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goddard, J., Molyneux, P.and Wilson, J.O.S. (2004). The profitabilityof European banks. The Manchester School. 72(3), 363–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hannan, T. H. and Prager, R. A. (2009). The profitability of small single-market banks in an era of multi-market banking. Journal of Banking & Finance. 33(2), 263–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency cost of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review. 76(2), 323–39.Google Scholar
  16. La Porta, R., López-de-Silandes, F. and Shleifer, A. (2002). Government ownership of banks. Journal of Finance. 57(1), 265–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lindblom, T., Olsson, M. and Willesson, M. (2011). Financial crisis and bank profitability. In P. Molyneux (ed.), Bank Performance, Risk and Firm Financing. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 83–105.Google Scholar
  18. Mehran, H. and Thakor, A. (2009). Bank capital and value in the cross section. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports, No. 390, September.Google Scholar
  19. Molyneux, P. and Thornton, J. (1992). The determinants of European bank profitability: a note. Journal of Banking and Finance. 16, 1173–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Olson, D. and Zoubi, A. T. (2011). Efficiency and bank profitability in MENA countries. Emerging Markets Review. 23, 94–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ross, S. (1977). The Determination of financial structure: the incentive signalling approach. Bell Journal of Economics. 8, 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Said, R. M. and Tumin, M. H. (2011). Performance and financial ratios of commercial banks in Malaysia and China. International Review of Business Research Papers. 7(2), 157–69.Google Scholar
  23. Staikouras, S. K. (2003). The interest rate risk exposure of financial intermediaries: a review of the theory and empirical evidence. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments. 12(4), 257–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Ted Lindblom and Magnus Willesson 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ted Lindblom
  • Magnus Willesson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations