Skip to main content

Legitimacy in Malaysia: Dilemmas and Deficits

  • Chapter
Political Legitimacy in Asia

Part of the book series: Palgrave Series on Asian Governance ((PSAG))

  • 499 Accesses

Abstract

The notion of political legitimacy is imprecise, subjective, and often tautological. Even so, in applying it to Malaysia, we discover some unique utility. Among the countries considered in this volume, Malaysia is the only nation starkly divided along ethnic lines, scored nearly in half between the Malays and non-Malays, the latter a residual, negatively designated category that mainly includes local Chinese, Indians, and social minorities in Sabah and Sarawak. And though this dyad has been muddied somewhat by evolving intraethnic identities, societal perceptions of the government’s legitimacy—or lack of it—have historically possessed clear focus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abbott, Jason P. 2000. “Bittersweet Victory: The 1999 Malaysian General Election and the Anwar Ibrahim Affair.” The Roundtable 893: 245–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alavi, Rokiah. 1996. Industrialization in Malaysia: Import Substitution and Infant Industry Performance. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baradan Kuppusamy. 2007. “Leaders Urge Return to Moderation After Protests in Malaysia.” South China Morning Post, November 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2008. “Two-Party System Takes Shape in Malaysia.” Asia Times Online, April 10, http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/JD10Ae01.html.

  • Beetham, David. 1991. The Legitimation of Power. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brownlee, Jason. 2007. Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2008. “Bound to Rule: Party Institutions and Regime Trajectories in Malaysia and the Philippines.” Journal of East Asian Studies 81: 89–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, William. 2010. “Transition from Single-Party Dominance? New Data from Malaysia.” Journal of East Asian Studies 101: 91–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, James, and Wong Chin Huat. 2009. “Malaysia’s Electoral Upheaval.” Journal of Democracy 203: 71–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, Harold. 1996. Government and Society in Malaysia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatsiounis, Ioannis. 2007. “Anti-graft War Backfires in Malaysia.” AsiaTimes.com, March 21, http://www.atimes.com.

  • Gilley, Bruce. 2005. “Political Legitimacy in Malaysia: Regime Performance in the Asian Context.” In Legitimacy: Ambiguities of Success and Failure, edited by Lynn White, 29–66. New Jersey: World Scientific.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, Edmund Terence. 1998. “Malaysia.” In Political Party Systems and Democratic Development in East and Southeast Asia, vol. 1, edited by Wolfgang Sachsenroder and Ulrike E. Frings, 226–288. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, Edmund Terence, and K. S. Jomo. 1999. Malaysia’s Political Economy: Politics, Patronage and Profits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, Kenneth F. 2007. Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico’s Democratization in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, Stephen. 2000. The Political Economy of the Asian Financial Crisis. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, Donald. 1993. “Democracy in Divided Societies.” Journal of Democracy 44: 18–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jesudason, James V. 1987. Ethnicity and the Economy: The State, Chinese Business and Multinationals in Malaysia. Singapore: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1996. “The Syncretic State and the Structuring of Oppositional Politics in Malaysia.” In Political Oppositions in Industrializing Asia, edited by Garry Rodan, 128–160. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuek Ser Kuang Keng. 2006. “Police ‘Attack’ IPCMC in Internal Bulletin.” Malaysiakini.com, May 27, http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/51654.

  • Lee Hock Guan. 2008. “Malaysia in 2007: Abdullah Administration under Siege.” In Southeast Asian Affairs, Volume 2008, edited by Daljit Singh and Tin Maung Maung Than, 187–208. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan A. Way. 2002. “The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 132: 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, G. 2005. “Debating an Equitable Malaysia: Towards an Alternative New National Agenda.” Aliran Monthly 258, http://www.aliran.com/archives/monthly/2005b/8h.html

  • Lim Kit Siang. 2008. “Political Tsunami in General Election.” Lim Kit Siang for Malaysia, May 8, http://blog.limkitsiang.com/2008/03/08/political-tsunami-in-general-election/

  • Liow, Joseph Chinyong 2004. “Political Islam in Malaysia: Problematising Discourse and Practice in the UMNO-PAS ‘Islamisation Race.’” Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 422: 184–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, Leslie. 2003–2004. “He’s No Mahathir, and that’s OK.” Far Eastern Economic Review, December 25–January 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2004. “Abdullah Gains in Corruption Fight.” Far Eastern Economic Review, March 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Means, Gordon P. 1991. Malaysian Politics: The Second Generation. Singapore: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merdeka Center. 2008 [incorrectly dated 2007]. 12th General Elections—Observations on Issues, Voting Directions and Implications. http://www.merdeka.org/v2/download/Post%20Election%20Overview%20-%20Presentation.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, R. S., and Diane K. Mauzy. 1999. Malaysian Politics under Mahathir. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moten, Abdul Rashid. 2006. “The 2004 General Elections in Malaysia: A Mandate to Rule.” Asian Survey 462: 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muzaffar, Chandra. 1979. Protector? An Analysis of the Concept and Practice of Loyalty in Leader-Led Relationships within Malay Society. Penang: Aliran.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netto, Anil. 2008. “Fuel on Malaysia’s Political Fire.” Asia Times Online, June 11, http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/JF11Ae02.html.

  • Ong Kian Miang. 2008. “Making Sense of the Political Tsunami.” Malaysiakini.com, March 11, http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/79604.

  • Pepinsky, Thomas B. 2009. “The 2008 Malaysian Elections: An End to Ethnic Politics?” Journal of East Asian Studies 91: 87–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, Brendon. 2004a. “Battling Money Politics Entails Tougher Crackdown.” New Sunday Times, September 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2004b. “Show Us Proof, Says Abdullah.” New Straits Times, September 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schedler, Andreas. 2002. “The Menu of Manipulation.” Journal of Democracy 132: 36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherford, M. Stephen. 1992. “Measuring Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 861: 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Meredith L. 2009. “Edging toward a New Politics in Malaysia: Civil Society at the Gate?” Asian Survey 495: 741–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, Bridget. 2007. “Malaysia’s November 2007 Protests: Challenge to Legitimacy.” Asia Pacfic Bulletin 6: 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahiid, Syed Jaymal, and Fathi Aris Omar. 2008. “Khir Toyo: UMNO Has Lost Touch with Reality.” Malaysiakini.com, April 28, http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/82047.

  • Zakaria Haji Ahmad. 1989. “Malaysia: Quasi Democracy in a Divided Society.” In Democracy in Developing Countries, vol. 3: Asia, edited by Larry Diamond, Juan Linz, and Seymour Martin Lipset, 347–381. Boulder CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

John Kane Hui-Chieh Loy Haig Patapan

Copyright information

© 2011 John Kane, Hui-Chieh Loy, and Haig Patapan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Case, W. (2011). Legitimacy in Malaysia: Dilemmas and Deficits. In: Kane, J., Loy, HC., Patapan, H. (eds) Political Legitimacy in Asia. Palgrave Series on Asian Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137001474_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics