Skip to main content

Using the Capability Approach to Evaluate Health and Care for Individuals and Groups in England

  • Chapter

Abstract

Applying Sen’s capability approach involves tackling a number of challenges. These challenges include the specification and justification of a capability list for the particular evaluative exercise at hand. A second challenge is capturing the complex concept of ‘capability’, where possible going beyond observation of functionings. Thirdly, researchers must try to identify data sources which reflect the breadth and depth of the theoretical approach. The Equality Measurement Framework (EMF) is a new capability-based analytical tool that we have developed in partnership with the Equality and Human Rights Commission, which attempts to tackle these challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alkire, S., Bastagli, F., Burchardt, T., Clark, D., Holder, H., Ibrahim, S., Munoz, M., Terrazas, P., Tsang, T. and Vizard, P. (2009) Developing the Equality Measurement Framework: Selecting the Indicators, EHRC Research Report 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleich, S., Ozaltin, E. and Murray, C. (2009) ‘How Does Satisfaction with the Healthcare System Relate to Patient Experience?’ Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 87(4), pp. 271–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchardt, T. (2004) ‘Capabilities and Disability: the Capabilities Framework and the Social Model of Disability’, Disability & Society, 19 (7), pp. 735–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchardt, T. (2005) ‘One Man’s Rags Are Another Man’s Riches: Identifying Adaptive Preferences Using Panel Data’, Social Indicators Research, 74, pp. 57–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchardt, T. and Vizard, P. (2011) ‘Operationalizing the Capability Approach as a Basis for Equality and Human Rights Monitoring in Twenty-First-Century Britain’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 12 (1), pp. 91–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Care Quality Commission (2011) Dignity and Nutrition Inspection Programme: National Overview, available online at http://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/media/documents/20111007_dignity_and_nutrition_inspection_report_final_ update.pdf (accessed 12 November 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappero-Martinetti, E. (2008) ‘Complexity and Vagueness in the Capability Approach: Strengths or Weaknesses?’ In Alkire S. et al. (eds) The Capability Approach: Concepts, Applications and Measurement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J., Newman, J. and Westmarland, L. (2007) ‘The Antagonisms of Choice: New Labour and the Reform of Public Services’, Social Policy & Society, 7 (2), pp. 245–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Z., Gibbons, S., Jones, S. and McGuire, A. (2011) ‘Does Hospital Competition Save Lives? Evidence From the English NHS Patient Choice Reforms’, The Economic Journal, 121 (August), F228–F260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, R. (2010) Where Did the Axe Fall? Institute for Fiscal Studies 2010 Spending Review briefing, 21 October, http://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/5311 (accessed 29 November 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (1998) Independent Inquiry into inequalities in Health (Acheson Report), http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4097582 (accessed 19 July 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health and Social Security (DHSS) (1980), Inequalities in Health, Report of a Research Working Group. DHSS, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glendinning, C. (2008) ‘Increasing Choice and Control for Older and Disabled People: a Critical Review of New Developments in England’, Social Policy & Administration, 42 (5), pp. 451–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healthcare Commission (2006) Variations in the experiences of patients in England: Analysis of the Healthcare Commission’s 2004/2005 national surveys of patients, http://archive.cqc.org.uk/_db/_documents/Surveys_Variations_Report1.pdf (accessed 5th April 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills, J. (2011) ‘The Changing Architecture of the uk Welfare State’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 27 (4), pp. 589–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holder, H., Tsang, T. and Vizard, P. (2011) Developing the Equality Measurement Framework: Selecting the Indicators for Children and Young People, EHRC Research Report 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphries, R. (2011) Social Care Funding and the nhs: An Impending Crisis? The King’s Fund, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Grand, J. (2007) The Other Invisible Hand: Delivering Public Services through Choice and Competition, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmot Review (2010), Fair Society, Healthy Lives: The Marmot Review http://www. instituteofhealthequity.org/projects/fair-society-healthy-lives-the-marmotreview (accessed 19 July 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Natcen and CASE (2012) Analysing Data on Equality, Good Relations and Human Rights, EHRC commissioned project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2000) Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2003) ‘Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Global Justice’, Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), pp. 33–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2008) Infant mortality by ethnic group, 2005 data, Reference table, 24 June 2008, available: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/re-reference-tables.html?edition=tcm%3A77–46494 (accessed February 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (1996) Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (2011) Care and Compassion. Report of the Health Services Ombudsman on 10 Investigations into NHS Care of Older People, Fourth report of the Health Service Commissioner for England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qizilbash, M. (2002) ‘Development, Common Foes and Shared Values’, Review of Political Economy, 14(4), pp. 463–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche, M. (2009) ‘Capability and Group Inequalities: Revealing the Latent Structure’, Working Paper, http://www.ophi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/OPHIRP18a.pdf?cda6c1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassi F. (2009) ‘Health Inequalities: A Persistent Problem’, in Hills, J., Sefton, T., and Stewart, K. (eds), Towards a More Equal Society, Poverty: Inequality and Policy since 1997, Policy Press, Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Session 2010–2011, HC 778: TSO, London. Available online at www.ombudsman. org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/7216/Care-and-Compassion-PHSO0114web.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1985) Commodities and Capabilities, North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1989) ‘Women’s Survival as a Development Problem’, Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 43, pp. 14–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1992) Inequality Re-examined, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2002) Rationality and Freedom, Belknap Press, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2004) ‘Capabilities, Lists and Public Reason: Continuing the Conversation’, Feminist Economics, 10(3), pp. 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A., Stiglitz, J and Fitoussi, J. (2009) Final Report of Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress (Stiglitz–Sen Commission) http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf (accessed 10 May 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sizmur, S. (2011) Multilevel Analysis of Patient Experience, Picker Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R. (1993) ‘Review: Welfare, Resources, and Capabilities: A Review of Inequality Re-Examined by Amartya Sen’, Journal of Economic Literature, 31, pp. 1947–1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R. (2003) ‘Opportunity as a Space for Individuality: Its Value and the Impossibility of Measuring It’, Ethics, 113(4), pp. 783–809.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Tania Burchardt and Polly Vizard

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burchardt, T., Vizard, P. (2014). Using the Capability Approach to Evaluate Health and Care for Individuals and Groups in England. In: Ibrahim, S., Tiwari, M. (eds) The Capability Approach. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137001436_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics