Abstract
A peace process is often compared to climbing a mountain, but a mountain range is a better metaphor, and the first peak is usually the ending of violence. All previous expeditions have failed. There are no obvious tracks to the top, nor any maps to provide guidance. The climbers, previously preoccupied with the arts of war, are unaccustomed to compromise and must pick up the skills as they go along. They must rely on each other’s co-operation for survival. To make matters worse, the mountaineering team is composed of people who have previously been at each others’ throats, often literally, and who must now overcome their suspicions and fears to accomplish a common task for the first time. For many, the ending of violence is more than enough.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
I. William Zartman, ‘Dynamics and Constraints’, in I. William Zartman (ed.), Elusive Peace Negotiating and End to Civil Wars (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1995), pp. 3–29 (18).
A. Paton, Cry the Beloved Country ( London: Penguin, 1958 ), p. 116.
L. Berkowitz, Aggression: a Social Psychological Analysis ( New York: McGraw Hill, 1962 ), p. 183.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2000 John Darby and Roger Mac Ginty
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Darby, J., Ginty, R.M. (2000). Conclusion: The Management of Peace. In: Darby, J., Ginty, R.M. (eds) The Management of Peace Processes. Ethnic and Intercommunity Conflict Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333993668_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333993668_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42047-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-333-99366-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)