Abstract
The purpose of this chapter is to determine the applicability of the security dilemma to ethnic tensions within Southeast Asia and the prospects of mitigating its effects. The chapter does not provide an analysis of all ethnic tensions in the region because such an undertaking would be beyond the scope of one chapter. Rather than examining each ASEAN member separately the analysis will focus on three case studies involving ethnic conflict: ethnocratic regimes; self-determination; migration. In all three case studies the focus is on the existence of the three characteristics of the security dilemma in the relations between ethnic groups, and also between ethnic groups and the regime. Is their fear of losing their identity based upon an illusory incompatibility? Is their fear a misperception based upon uncertainty of the other’s intent? Are their solutions paradoxical and result in making matters worse by creating a real threat to their ethnicity? This section will then be followed with an examination of power-sharing and ethnic reconstruction to determine if these explain the apparent success of some ASEAN states in mitigating the intra-state security dilemma. However, because the security dilemma operates in a self-help environment, it is first necessary to determine whether the ASEAN members are weak states.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Muthiah Alagappa, The Dynamic of International Security in Southeast Asia: Change and Continuity’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, 45 /1 (May 1991), p. 4.
David Brown, The State and Ethnic Politics in Southeast Asia ( London: Routledge, 1994 ), p. 37.
David I. Steinberg, The Future of Burma: Crisis and Choice in Myanmar ( London: University Press of America, 1990 ), p. 75.
Josef Silverstein, Burmese Politics: The Dilemma of National Unity ( New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1980 ), p. 151.
Josef Silverstein, ‘Fifty Years of Failure in Burma’, in Michael E. Brown and Sumit Ganguly (eds.), Government Policies and Ethnic Relations in Asia and the Pacific ( London: The MIT Press, 1997 ), p. 190.
Clive J. Christie, A Modern History of South East Asia: Decolonization, Nationalism and Separatism ( London: Tauris Academic Press, 1996 ), p. 63.
Milton J. Esman, Ethnic Politics ( Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994 ), p. 65.
William Case, ‘Comparative Malaysian Leadership: Tunku Abdul Rahman and Mahathir Mohamad’, Asian Survey, 31 /5 (May 1991), p. 467.
See Gordon P. Means, Malaysian Politics: The Second Generation ( Singapore: Oxford University Press, 1991 ), pp. 60–61.
Harold Crouch, ‘Malaysia: Neither Authoritarian Nor Democratic’, in Kevin Hewison, Richard Robison and Garry Rodan (eds.), Southeast Asia in the 1990s (St Leonards: Allen & Unwin, 1993), p. 145. For more on share ownership see DeBernardi and Taronwski, op. cit., ‘Managing Multicultural Societies’, p. 83.
James Jesudason, Ethnicity and the Economy: The State, Chinese Business, and Multinationals in Malaysia ( New York: Oxford University Press, 1989 ), p. 52.
John Slimming, Malaysia: Death of a Democracy ( London: John Murray, 1969 ), p. 18.
Harold Crouch, ‘Malaysia: Do Elections Make a Difference?’, in R.H. Taylor (ed.), The Politics of Elections in Southeast Asia ( New York: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 1996 ), p. 132.
Donald L. Horowitz, ‘Cause and Consequence in Public Theory: Ethnic Policy and System Transformation in Malaysia’, Policy Sciences 22/3–4 (November 1989), p. 261.
Charles F. Keyes, Isan: Regionalism in Northeastern Thailand (Ithaca: Data Paper 65, Cornell University Southeast Asia Program, 1967 ), p. 3.
W.K. Che Man, Muslim Separatism: The Moros of Southern Philippines and the Malays of Southern Thailand ( Singapore: Oxford University Press, 1990 ), p. 17.
A World Bank Country Study, Indonesia: The Transmigration Program in Perspective ( Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1988 ), p. 91.
Myron Weiner, The Global Migration Crisis: Challenges to States and to Human Rights ( New York: HarperCollins College Publishers, 1995 ), p. 135.
Catherine Caulfield, In the Rainforest ( London: Heinemann, 1984 ), pp. 197–198.
Jonathan Rigg, Southeast Asia a Region in Transition: A Thematic Human Geography of the ASEAN Region ( London: Unwin Hyman, 1991 ), p. 104.
James F. Eder, On the Road to Tribal Extinction: Depopulation, Deculturation, and Adaptive Well-Being Among the Batak of the Philippines ( Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987 ).
Chaim D. Kaufmann, ‘Possible and Impossible Solutions to Ethnic Civil Wars’, International Security 20/4 (Spring 1996), p. 147.
Chaim D. Kaufmann, When All Else Fails: Ethnic Population Transfers and Partitions in the Twentieth Century’, International Security, 23/2 (Fall 1998 ), p. 122.
Robert Jervis, ‘Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma’, World Politics, 30 /1 (January 1978), pp. 167–214.
Barry R. Posen, ‘The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict’, Survival 35/1 (Spring 1993), pp. 27–47.
David A. Lake and Donald Rothchild, ‘Containing Fear: The Origins and Management of Ethnic Conflict’, International Security 21/2 (Fall 1996), p. 52.
Robert Jervis, Perception and Misperception in International Politics ( Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976 ), p. 67.
Harold Crouch, ‘Malaysia: Neither authoritarian nor democratic’, in Kevin Hewison, Richard Robison and Garry Rodan (eds.), Southeast Asia in the 1990s ( St Leonards: Allen & Unwin, 1993 ), p. 152.
William Case, ‘Malaysia: Aspects and Audiences of Legitimacy’, in Muthiah Alagappa (ed.), Political Legitimacy in Southeast Asia: The Quest for Moral Authority ( Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995 ), p. 87.
Renée de Nevers, ‘Democratization and Ethnic Conflict’, Survival 35/2 (Summer 1993), p. 45.
James Putzel, ‘Why Has Democratization Been a Weaker Impulse in Indonesia and Malaysia than in the Philippines?’, in David Potter, David Goldblatt, Margaret Kiloh and Paul Lewis (eds.), Democratization ( London: Polity Press, 1997 ), p. 254.
Donald G. McCloud, Southeast Asia: Tradition and Modernity in the Contemporary World ( Boulder: Westview Press, 1995 ), pp. 270–271.
Thongchai Winichakul, ‘The Changing Landscape of the Past: New Histories in Thailand Since 1973’, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 26 /1 (March 1995), p. 115.
T.N. Harper, New Malays, New Malaysians: Nationalism, Society and History’, Southeast Asian Affairs 1996 ( Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 1996 ), p. 242.
James V. Jesudason, ‘Chinese Business and Ethnic Equilibrium in Malaysia’, Development and Change, 28 /1 (1997), p. 131.
K.S. Nathan, ‘Malaysia: Reinventing the Nation’, in Muthiah Alagappa, Asian Security Practice: Material and Ideational Influences ( Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998 ), p. 548.
Randall L. Schweller, ‘Neorealism’s Status-Quo Bias: What Security Dilemma?’, Security Studies 5/3 (Spring 1996), p. 104.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2000 Alan Collins
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Collins, A. (2000). Ethnic Tensions and the Security Dilemma in Southeast Asia. In: The Security Dilemmas of Southeast Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333985632_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333985632_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42386-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-333-98563-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)