Skip to main content

The Learning State

  • Chapter
Capitalism and Social Progress
  • 59 Accesses

Abstract

The nineteenth-century German philosopher, Friedrich Hegel, observed that the strengths that build great nations invariably become obsessions which eventually destroy them. In America and Britain we have argued that the dominant response to the transformation of social and economic life has been to return to the first principles of western capitalism based on market individualism. The argument of this book is that such a position is unsustainable given the social and economic challenges of the twenty-first century. The fundamental tasks confronting nations are those of providing the conditions which will enable their citizens to develop the collective intelligence required to meet an economic and social environment which demands ever smarter people.

We are floundering, both in practice and in analysis, because we no longer know what holds a society together.

Daniel Bell

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Richard G. Wilkinson, Unhealthy Societies: The Afflictions of Inequality, London: Routledge, 1996.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Ichiro Kawachi, Bruce Kennedy, Richard Wilkinson (eds) The Society and Population Health Reader: Income Inequality and Health, New York: New Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marilyn Waring, If Women Counted: A New Feminist Economics, London: MacMillan Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. These figures are taken from Andrew Hacker, Money, Who Has How Much and Why, New York: Scribners, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. This of course did not always mean acceptance of middle-class norms of society. See Paul Willis, Learning to Labour, Farnborough: Saxon House, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  6. Michael Buroway, Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labour Process of Monopoly Capitalism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  7. George Gilder, Wealth and Poverty, New York: Basic Books, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ian Gough, ‘Justifying basic income?’ Imprints, vol. 1, 1996, pp. 82–3.

    Google Scholar 

  9. This phrase is taken from Michael Ignatieff, The Needs of Strangers, London: Chatto & Windus, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Claus Offe, Contradictions of the Welfare State, London: Hutchinson, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Paul Johnson and Howard Reed, ‘Intergenerational mobility among the rich and the poor: results from the National Child Development Survey’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 12, 1996, 127–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Peter Gottschalk, ‘Inequality, income growth and mobility: the basic facts’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 11, 1997, 21–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stephen Raudenbush and Rafa Kasim, ‘Cognitive skill and economic inequality: findings from the National Adult Literacy Survey’, Harvard Educational Review, vol. 68, 1998, 3379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. John Bynner, New Routes to Employment: Integration and Exclusion, Social Statistics Research Unit, City University, London, April, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Williams Julius Wilson, The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, The Underclass and Public Policy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  16. For easily understood discussions of these issues see Alissa Goodman, Paul Johnson and Steven Webb, Inequality in the United Kingdom, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  17. Andrew Hacker, Money, Who Has How Much and Why, New York: Scribners, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  18. Frank Levy, The New Dollars and Dreams, New York: Russell Sage, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Betsy Morris, ‘Is your family wrecking your career? (and vice versa)’, Fortune March 17, 1997, pp. 41–9.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jeremy Rifkin, The End of Work, New York: Tarcher/Putnam, 1996, p. 294.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Philippe Van Parijs, ‘Basic income and the two dilemmas of the welfare state’, The Political Quarterly, vol. 67, 1996, 63–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ian Gough, ‘Social welfare and competitiveness’, New Political Economy, vol. 1, 1996, 209–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Carol Pateman, The Disorder of Women, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989, p. 202.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See Bob Connell, ‘The big picture: masculinities in recent world history’, in A. H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, and A. S. Wells, A. (eds) Education: Culture, Economy and Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Martin Carnoy, Faded Dreams: The Politics and Economics of Race in America, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Lawrence Steinberg, Beyond the Classroom: Why School Reform Has Failed and What Parents Need to Do, New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996, pp. 92–3.

    Google Scholar 

  27. On the notion of compensatory education see A. H. Halsey ‘Sociology and the equality debate’, Oxford Review of Education, vol. 9, 1975, 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pierre Bourdieu and Jean-Claude Passeron, The Inheritors: French Students and their Relation to Culture, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  29. Phillip Brown and Richard Scase, Higher Education and Corporate Realities: Class culture and the Decline of Graduate Careers, London: University College London Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  30. E. Said ‘Orientalism Reconsidered’, in F. Barker et al. (eds) Literature, Politics and Theory New York: Methven, 1986, p. 153.

    Google Scholar 

  31. See Howard S. Becker, ‘Schools and Systems of Stratification’ in A. H. Halsey et al. (eds) Education, Economy and Society, New York: Free Press, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  32. James Coleman, ‘The concept of equality of educational opportunity’, Harvard Educational Review, vol. 38, 1968, pp. 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. See Martin Thrupp, Do Schools make a Difference?: Let’s Get Real, Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  34. See Michael Young, The Curriculum of the Future, London: Taylor & Francis, 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Zsuzsa Ferge, A Society in the Making: Hungarian Social and Societal Policy, 19451975, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1979, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tom Bottomore ‘Citizenship and social class: forty years on’, in T. H. Marshall and Tom Bottomore, Citizenship and Social Class London: Pluto Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2001 Phillip Brown and Hugh Lauder

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brown, P., Lauder, H. (2001). The Learning State. In: Capitalism and Social Progress. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333985380_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics