Skip to main content

The Demise of Industrial Man

  • Chapter
Capitalism and Social Progress
  • 58 Accesses

Abstract

At the beginning of the twenty-first century a return to regular full employment is little more than a pipe dream. Unemployment and non-standard forms of work, including part-time, temporary and contract employment are as much a part of the economic landscape as the rust-belt, silicon valley and the Dow Jones Index. Nevertheless, some commentators in the United States argued that at the beginning of our new century, a combination of fiscal probity, technological innovation and global free markets, have tamed the boom—bust nature of capitalism. Consequently, there was the prospect of permanent growth and a return to full employment. Robert Eisner neatly captured the mood: ‘the current technological, informational, and communications revolution is spawning all kinds of economies so that we can produce more with less. Only God knows how fast our economy can actually grow, or how low unemployment can get, if we have the purchasing power for all that we can produce’.1 In Britain, Gordan Brown, as New Labour’s Chancellor of the Exchequer, resolved that `if those who can work take the responsibility to work, if employers take the responsibility to train and to invest, and if all of us show the same responsibility in pay’, then Britain can, he argued, deliver ‘a goal now within our reach for the twenty-first century — full employment for our country’.2 A commitment to full employment is politically seductive because it is seen to be a way of resolving the distributional question of ‘who gets what’, as we will show in the following chapter. But these echoes of the Golden era clearly underestimate the scale of economic and social change.

Even outside of work, industrial society is a wage labor society through and through in the plan of its life, in its joys and sorrows, in its concept of achievement, in its justification of inequality, in its social welfare laws, in its balance of power and in its politics and culture. If it is facing a systematic transformation of wage labour then it is facing a social transformation.

Ulrich Beck

Welfare has essentially ended for economic failures in America.

Lester Thurow

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Robert Eisner, ‘Damn the NAIRU - and full speed ahead’, in J. J. Jasinowski (ed.) The Rising Tide, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1998, p. 68.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See UK Department of Education and Employment (DfEE) report Labour Market and Skills Trends 1998/9 London: DfEE, 1998, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See John Hills, Income and Wealth: Volume Two, A Summary of the Evidence, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Department of Education and Employment (DfEE) Labour Market and Skill Trends Sudbury, Suffolk: DfEE Publications, 1998, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Institute for Employment Research, Review of the Economy and Employment University of Warwick, 1999, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. John Hills, The Future of Welfare, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 1993, p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Richard Freeman, ‘The limits of wage flexibility to curing unemployment’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 11, 1995, 63–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Richard Freeman, When Earnings Diverge: Causes, Consequences, and Cures for the New Inequality in the US, Washington, DC: National Policy Association, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Paul Duggan, ‘Youth feel the force of a vow kept’, The Washington Post, November 9, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Criminal supervision is designed as parole or incarceration, OECD Economic Report: United States 1995, Paris: OECD, 1996, p. 149.

    Google Scholar 

  11. David Rose, ‘Shattered dream of British justice’, The Observer, November 17, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sara S. McLanahan, ‘The conseugences of single motherhood’, American Prospect, vol. 18, 1994, Summer, 48–58, p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Giving a total of 48.3 per cent. See Maya Federman et al. ‘What does it mean to be poor in America?’ Monthly labour Review, 1996 May, 3–17, p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Christopher Ogden, ‘Bye-bye, American pie’, Time August 12, 1996, p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Barry Hugill, ‘Welfare hits state of crisis’, The Observer, March 3, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Alan Walker and Carol Walker, (eds) Britain Divided: The Growth of Social Exclusion in the 1980s and 1990s, London: Child Poverty Action Group, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See John Hills, Income and Wealth: Volume Two, A Summary of the Evidence, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 1995, p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Amanda Gosling, Stephen Machin and Costas Meghir, ‘What has happened to the wages of men since 1966?’, in J.Hills (ed.) New Inequalities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Randy E. Llg, ‘The nature of employment growth, 1989–95’, Monthly Labor Review 1996 June, 29–36. These figures are derived from Table one, p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wolfgang Streeck, ‘German capitalism: does it exist? can it survive?’, New Political Economy, 2, 1997, 237–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Income Data Servises (IDS) New Unionism: Wither or Whither? No. 91, 1999 September.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See Brendan J. Burchell, Diana Day, Maria Hudson, David Ladipo, Roy Mankelow, Jane P. Nolan, Hannah Reed, Ines C. Wichert and Frank Wilkinson, Job Insecurity and Work Intensification, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 1999, pp. 34–6.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Andrew M. Sum, Neal Fogg and Robert Taggart, ‘The economics of despair’, American Prospect, vol. 27 1996 July/August, 83–8, p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Andrew M. Sum, Neal Fogg and Robert Taggart, ‘The economics of despair’, American Prospect, vol. 27 1996 July/August, 83–8, p. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  25. OECD, Economic Survey: United States, Paris: OECD, 1995, p. 114.

    Google Scholar 

  26. OECD Lifelong Learning for All Paris: OECD, 1996, pp. 309–12.

    Google Scholar 

  27. OECD Lifelong Learning for All Paris: OECD, 1996, p. 310.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lynn A. Karoly, ‘Anatomy of the US income distribution: two decades of change’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 12, 76–94, 1996, p. 92.

    Google Scholar 

  29. See OECD Economic Survey: United States Paris: OECD, 1995, p. 206.

    Google Scholar 

  30. See Randy E. Llg, ‘The nature of employment growth, 1989–95’, Monthly Labor Review, 1996 June, 29–36, p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Carole Pateman, The Disorder of Women: Democracy, Feminism and Political Theory, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Institute of Employment Research (IER), Review of the Economy and Employment 1998/9, University of Warwick, IER, 1999, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Marilyn French, The War Against Women, New York: Summit Books, 1992, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, Inquiry into Income and Wealth, vol. 1, York: Joseph Rowntree Founation, 1995, p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hilary Land, ‘The demise of the male breadwinner - in practice but not in theory: a challenge for social security systems’, in Sally Baldwin & Jane Falkingham (eds) Social Security and Social Change, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1994, p. 110.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Andrew M. Sum, Neal Fogg and Robert Taggart, ‘The economics of despair’, American Prospect, vol. 27 1996 July/August, 83–8, p. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Paul Johnson, ‘The assessment: inequality’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy vol. 12, 1996, 1–14, p. 9

    Google Scholar 

  38. Alissa Goodman, Paul Johnson and Steven Webb, Inequality in the UK Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997. See also Social Trends 1998 London: Central Statistical Office, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Teresa Rees, Mainstreaming Equality in the European Union: Education, Training and Labour Markets Policies, London: Routledge, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  40. See OECD Employment Outlook Paris: OECD, 1996 July, p. 192.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Arnlaug Leira, ‘Combining work and family: working mothers in Scandinavia and the European Community’, in P. Brown and R. Crompton (eds) Economic Restructuring and Social Exclusion, London: University College London Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kathleen Gerson, ‘Coping with commitment: dilemmas and conflicts of family life’, in Alan Wolfe, (ed.) America at Century’s End, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991, p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  43. See Lynn A. Karoly, ‘Anatomy of the US income distribution: two decades of change’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 12, 1996, 76–95, p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  44. R. W. Connell, ‘The big picture: masculinities in recent world history’, Theory and Society, vol. 22, 1993, 597–623, p. 613.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2001 Phillip Brown and Hugh Lauder

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brown, P., Lauder, H. (2001). The Demise of Industrial Man. In: Capitalism and Social Progress. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333985380_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics