Skip to main content
  • 91 Accesses

Abstract

Both Galileo Galilei and William Harvey were greatly admired by Hobbes,1 who regarded the former as ‘the greatest scientist of all time’ (Anti-White, 123). According to Aubrey’s account:

when [Hobbes] was at Florence he contracted friendship with the famous Galileo Galilei, whom he extremely venerated and magnified and not only as he was a prodigious wit, but for his sweetness of nature and manners (Brief Lives, 161).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. On this, see John Watkins, Hobbes’s System of Ideas: A Study in the Political Significance of Philosophical Theories, 2nd ed. (London: Hutchinson, 1973), pp. 34–42.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For a survey of the reactions of Hobbes’s contemporaries to his theories, see, for example, Samuel I. Mintz, The Hunting of Leviathan, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  3. In 1936 Leo Strauss, for example, in the preface to The Political Philosophy of Hobbes. Its basis and its genesis. (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1963; first published in 1936), makes clear that the ‘particular object’ of his study is to show ‘that the real basis of Hobbes’s political philosophy is not modern science’ (p. ix).

    Google Scholar 

  4. In a similar vein, Howard Warrender in The Political Philosophy of Hobbes. His theory of Obligation. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970, first published 1957), argues that if in fact Hobbes wanted to derive his moral theory from an empirical theory ‘he must be held to have failed in his main enterprise’ (p. 6),

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frithiof Brandt, Thomas Hobbes’ Mechanical Conception of Nature. (Copenhagen: Levin and Munksgaard, 1927), pp. 290–91.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Among the exceptions, see William Sacksteder, ‘Hobbes’ Geometrical Objects’, Philosophy of Science, 48 (1981) 573–90,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. and Martin Bertman, Body and Cause in Hobbes: Natural and Political. (Wakefield, NH: Longwood Academic, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2000 Gabriella Slomp

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Slomp, G. (2000). The Co-ordinates of Man: Time and Space. In: Thomas Hobbes and the Political Philosophy of Glory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333984437_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics