Skip to main content

The Ideology of Political Geometry

  • Chapter
  • 86 Accesses

Abstract

For he alone [the head of state] is not a member of the commonwealth, but its creator or preserver, and he alone is authorised to coerce others without being subject to any coercive law himself … For if he too could be coerced, he would not be the head of state, and the hierarchy of subordination would ascend infinitely. But if there were two persons exempt from coercion, neither would be subject to coercive laws, and neither could do to the other anything contrary to right, which is impossible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Immanuel Kant, ‘On the Common Saying: “This May be True in Theory, but it does not Apply in Practice’”, Part II (‘On the Relationship of Theory to Practice in Political Right’), in Political Writings 2nd ed., edited by Hans Reiss, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 75.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leibniz, ‘Caesarinus Furstenerius’ (1677), in Political Writings, edited by Patrick Riley, 2nd ed., (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1988, 118–19.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benito Mussolini, The political and social doctrine of Fascism, (authorized translation by Jane Soames), (London: Hogarth Press, 1933), 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Richard Tuck, Hobbes, in Quentin Skinner et al., Great Political Thinkers. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992), 211–12.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Steven Lukes, Individualism. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alasdair MacIntyre, A Short History of Ethics. (London: Routledge, 1967 and 1995), 139.

    Google Scholar 

  7. For example, Kenneth Minogue, ‘Hobbes and Political Language’, paper presented at the APSA meeting, Atlanta, 31 August–3 September 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. All reference are to Albert Camus, The Plague, translated by Stuart Gilbert, (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2000 Gabriella Slomp

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Slomp, G. (2000). The Ideology of Political Geometry. In: Thomas Hobbes and the Political Philosophy of Glory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333984437_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics