The most persistent form of sumptuary law was directed at the regulation of dress. Since dress is one of the central mechanisms through which gender is reproduced, it follows that a central feature of any inquiry into sumptuary law must be to explore the part that it played in the gender wars. Sumptuary law exhibited considerable variability in its presentation of gender; sometimes it was gender-nelltral (e.g. ‘no person, man or woman, may wear ...’), at other times it was explicit in directing its restrictions against a particular sex (e.g. ‘no woman may wear ...’), while on occasions wO:Q1en were specifically exempted from the sumptuary rules.1 It is significant that the target sex changed over time. Sometimes men and at other times women were the explicit target. On the surface no pattern is immediately discernible. This chapter will be concerned to explore whether or not it is possible to make sense of this variability and to do so in the context of the historical dynamic of gender relations.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1996 Alan Hunt
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hunt, A. (1996). Gender Wars: Sex, Power and Resistance. In: Governance of the Consuming Passions. Language, Discourse, Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333984390_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333984390_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-39427-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-333-98439-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)