Abstract
IPE is very much a material discipline. At its heart are questions about the social and political distribution of resources and the fulfilment of material needs including, at the most basic level, the physical requirements of the body (food, water, shelter, clothing, medical care and so on). It is, therefore, supremely ironic that such a discipline should be built around a depiction of humanity which appears both physically disembodied and socially disembedded: namely the abstract ‘rational actor model’.1 Of course, the reason it has been built around this model is that in its atomistic, individualistic, self-interested, market-oriented perspective, it represents ‘homo economicus’ (Hollis and Smith 1990), a subjectivity which is central to the ‘social epistemology’2 of capitalist modernity. Among other criticisms of a ubiquitous model that promotes and reflects a capitalist sensibility, it is now a commonplace observation in feminist circles that it is both masculinist and ethnocentric (see, for example, Tickner 1992; Peterson 1992; Nicholson 1990). The notion that a universal model of humanity can be divorced and abstracted from issues of embodiment and social context has been shown to be false.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ashley, R. K. (1989) ‘Living on Border Lines: Man, Poststructuralism, and War’, in J. Der Derian and M. Shapiro (eds) International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics ( Lexington, MA: Lexington Books ), pp. 259–321.
Benhabib, S. (1992) Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics ( Cambridge: Polity).
Bly, R. (1990) Iron John (Shaftesbury, Dorset: Element).
Bordo, S. (1993) Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture and the Body ( London: University of California Press).
Braidotti, R. (1994) Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory ( New York: Columbia University Press).
Brod, H. and M. Kaufman (eds) (1994) Theorizing Masculinities ( London: Sage ).
Butler, J. (1990) ‘Gender Trouble, Feminist Theory and Psychoanalytic Discourse’, in L. J. Nicholson (ed.) Feminism/Postmodernism ( London: Routledge ), pp. 324–40.
Chapman, R. and J. Rutherford (eds) (1988) Male Order: Unwrapping Masculinity ( London: Lawrence and Wishart ).
Cocks, J. (1989) The Oppositional Imagination: Feminism, Critique and Political Theory ( London: Routledge).
Cohn, C. (1993) ‘Wars, Wimps and Women: Talking Gender and Thinking War’, in M. Cooke and A. Woolacott (eds) Gendering War Talk ( Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press ), pp. 227–46.
Connell, R. W. (1987) Gender and Power ( Oxford: Polity/Blackwell).
Connell, R. W. (1993) ‘The Big Picture: Masculinities in Recent World History’, Theory and Society, 22, pp. 579–623.
Connell, R. W. (1995) Masculinities ( Cambridge: Polity).
Coole, D. (1993) Women in Political Theory, 2nd edn ( Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf).
Cornwall, A. and N. Lindisfarne (1994) ‘Dislocating Masculinity: Gender, Power and Anthropology’, in A. Cornwall and N. Lindisfarne (eds) Dislocating Masculinity: Comparative Ethnographies ( London: Routledge ), pp. 11–47.
Deibert, R. J. (1996) ‘Typographica: the Medium and the Medieval-to-Modern Transformation’, Review of International Studies, 22 (1), pp. 29–56.
Duroche, L. (1990) ‘Male Perception as Social Construct’, in J. Hearn and D. Morgan (eds) Men, Masculinities and Social Theory ( London: Unwin Hyman ), pp. 170–85.
Evans, D. T. (1993) Sexual Citizenship: The Material Construction of Sexualities ( London: Routledge).
Ferguson, K. E. (1993) The Man Question: Visions of Subjectivity in Feminist Theory ( Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
Geertz, C. (1993) Local Knowledge ( London: Fontana).
Haraway, D. J. (1991) Simians, Cyborgs and Women: the Reinvention of Nature ( London: Free Association Books).
Haraway, D. J. (1997) Modest Witness@Second_ Millennium. FemaleMan„_Meets_ OncoMouse%o: Feminism and Technoscience ( London: Routledge).
Harcourt, W. (1998) Women@Internet ( London: Zed).
Harvey, D. (1989) The Condition of Postmodernity ( London: Blackwell).
Hollis, M. and S. Smith (1990) Explaining and Understanding International Relations ( Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Hooper, C. (1997) ‘Masculinist Practices and Gender Politics: the Operation of Multiple Masculinities in International Relations’, in M. Zalewski and J. Parpart (eds) The ‘Man’ Question in International Relations ( Boulder, CO: Westview ), pp. 28–53.
Hooper, C. (1998) ‘Hegemonic Masculinities in Transition: the Case of Globalization’, in M. Marchand and A. Sisson Runyan (eds) Gender and Global Restructuring ( London: Routledge ).
Inayatullah, N. and D. Blaney (1995) ‘Realizing Sovereignty’, Review of International Studies, 21 (1), pp. 3–20.
Jackson, D. (1990) Unmasking Masculinity ( London: Routledge).
Kimmel, M. S. and M. Kaufman (1994) ‘Weekend Warriors: the New Men’s Movement’, in H. Brod and M. Kaufman (eds) Theorizing Masculinities ( London: Sage ), pp. 259–88.
Lash, S. and J. Urry (1994) Economies of Signs and Space ( London: Sage).
Mercer, K. and I. Julien (1988) ‘Race, Sexual Politics and Black Masculinity: a Dossier’, in R. Chapman and J. Rutherford (eds) Male Order: Unwrapping Mas-culinity ( London: Lawrence and Wishart ), pp. 97–164.
Metcalf, A. and M. Humphries (eds) (1985) The Sexuality of Men ( London: Pluto ).
Middleton, P. (1992) The Inward Gaze: Masculinity and Subjectivity in Modern Culture ( London: Routledge).
Modelski, G. and K. Poznanski (1996) ‘Evolutionary Paradigms in the Social Sciences’, International Studies Quarterly, 40 (3), pp. 315–19.
Mort, F. (1988) ‘Boy’s Own? Masculinity, Style and Popular Culture’, in R. Chapman and J. Rutherford (eds) Male Order: Unwrapping Masculinity ( London: Lawrence and Wishart ), pp. 193–224.
Nicholson, L. J. (ed.) (1990) Feminism/Postmodemism ( London: Routledge ).
Pateman, C. (1988) The Sexual Contract ( Cambridge: Polity).
Peterson, V. S. (1992) ‘Introduction’, in V. S. Peterson (ed.) Gendered States: Feminist (Re)Visions of International Relations Theory ( Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner ), pp. 1–29.
Ramazanoglu, C. and J. Holland (1993) ‘Women’s Sexuality and Men’s Appropriation of Desire’, in C. Ramazanoglu (ed.) Up against Foucault: Explorations of Some Tensions between Foucault and Feminism ( London: Routledge ), pp. 239–64.
Rose, G. (1993) ‘Spaces of the Future’, in J. Bird, B. Curtis, T. Puttnam, G. Robertson and L. Tickner (eds) Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change ( London: Routledge ), pp. 70–86.
Seidler, V. J. (1987) ‘Reason, Desire and Male Sexuality’, in P. Caplan (ed.) The Cultural Construction of Sexuality ( London: Tavistock ), pp. 82–112.
Seidler, V. J. (1988) ‘Fathering, Authority and Masculinity’, in R. Chapman and J. Rutherford (eds) Male Order: Unwrapping Masculinity ( London: Lawrence and Wishart ), pp. 272–302.
Seidler, V. J. (1989) Rediscovering Masculinity: Reason, Language and Sexuality ( London: Routledge).
Stone, A. R. (1996) The War of Desire and Technology at the Close of the Mechanical Age ( Cambridge, MA: MIT )
Taylor, C. (1989) Sources of the Self: the Making of Modern Identity ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Theweleit, K. (1987) Male Fantasies Volume 1 ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ).
Tickner, J. A. (1992) Gender in International Relations ( Oxford: Columbia University Press).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2000 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hooper, C. (2000). Disembodiment, Embodiment and the Construction of Hegemonic Masculinity. In: Youngs, G. (eds) Political Economy, Power and the Body. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333983904_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333983904_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-71924-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-333-98390-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)