Abstract
Mapping the political and administrative history of South Asia since independence over a period of fifty years is indeed a difficult exercise. At the time of independence, the divided old British India was faced overnight with the movement of millions of refugees, perhaps the largest exodus of people at any one time anywhere on the earth. This posed the problem not only of relief and rehabilitation, but also of welding the various communities divided by language, culture, religion, caste and creed into the working cohesion of two single yet separate unions. There was an immediate confrontation between them in October 1947 that only added to the perennial problems of economic disaster, inflation and food shortage. Each one of the problems not only had implications for politics and policy, but also for administration. This indeed was a monumental task for the two nations. These problems put the inherited and emergent administrative structure and governing process to a severe test.1 Over the years, there have been changes in administrative institutions, structures, styles and cultures in post-independence India and Pakistan, the two major countries of the region; however, administrative development has been an uneven process which can be best understood only in the context of the totality of this region’s politico-administrative environment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
For a historical perspective, see, O.P. Dwivedi and R.B. Jain, India’s Administrative State (New Delhi: Gitanjali Publishing House, 1985);
and O.P. Dwivedi, R.B. Jain and B.D. Dua, ‘Imperial Legacy, Bureaucracy, and Administrative Changes: India 1947–1987’, Public Administration and Development, vol. 9 (1989), pp. 253–69.
For a discussion on various models of development, see O.P. Dwivedi and Keith M. Henderson, ‘Development Alternatives: Alternative Administration’, Indian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 42, no. 1 (January–March 1996), pp. 16–31.
Mahbub ul Haq, Human Development in South Asia 1997 (Karachi, Pakistan: Oxford University Press, 1997), p. 3.
Ibid., p. 8.
Ibid.
Ibid., p. 103.
Bruce Lawrence, Defenders of God (San Francisco, Cal.: Harper & Row, 1989), p. 98.
Richard P. Taub, Bureaucrats Under Stress (Berkeley, Cal.: University of California Press, 1969), p. 161.
O.P. Dwivedi and R.B. Jain, India’s Administrative State (New Delhi: Gitanjali Publishing House, 1985), pp. 16–17.
The World Bank, The World Development Report (Washington D.C.: The World Bank, 1997), p. 86.
B.S. Wijeweera, ‘Policy Developments and Administrative Changes in Sri Lanka: 1948–1987’, Public Administration and Development, vol. 9, no. 3 (June–August 1987), p. 297.
R.C.S. Sarkar, ‘Role of Government Departments in the Legislative Process’, Journal of Constitutional and Parliamentary Studies, vol. 2 (1968), p. 1.
O.P. Dwivedi and R.B. Jain, ‘Bureaucratic Morality in India’, International Political Science Review, vol. 9, no. 3 (1988), pp. 205–14.
O.P. Dwivedi and R.B. Jain, India’s Administrative State, op. cit., pp. 122–3.
R.B. Jain and O.P. Dwivedi, ‘Administrative Culture and Bureaucratic Values in India’, Indian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 36, no. 3 (July–September 1990), p. 444.
Jai Narain, ‘Political Corruption: Reversal of Gandhian Legacy’, The Tribune (Chandigarh), 30 November 1996.
India, Report of the Committee on Prevention of Corruption. K. Santhanam, chair (New Delhi: Ministry of Home affairs, 1964), p. 13.
Mukut Shah, ‘Good Governance: Time for Another Freedom Struggle’, The Tribune (Chandigarh), 21 April 1997.
Nasir Islam, ‘Colonial Legacy, Administrative Reform and Politics: Pakistan 1947–1987’, Public Administration and Development, vol. 9, no. 3 (July–September 1989), p. 282.
‘De-criminalising Polity’, Editorial, The Tribune (Chandigarh), 22 August 1997, p. 8.
World Development Report (1997), op. cit., p. 165 (emphasis in the text).
Ibid., p. 105.
Ibid., p. 106 (emphasis in the text).
For further details, see Keith M. Henderson, ‘Internationalization and Indigenization’, in A. Farazmand (ed.), Handbook of Comparative and Development Administration (New York: Marcel Dekkar, 1999).
O.P. Dwivedi, India’s Environmental Policies, Programmes and Stewardship (London: Macmillan, 1997), p. 224.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1999 O. P. Dwivedi
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dwivedi, O.P. (1999). Governance and Administration in South Asia. In: Henderson, K.M., Dwivedi, O.P. (eds) Bureaucracy and the Alternatives in World Perspective. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333983355_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333983355_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-40735-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-333-98335-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)