Abstract
Since the 1980s, Europe’s relatively high unemployent rates (‘Eurosclerosis’) have been used by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and other international agencies as a basis for positing the United States as a model of labour market flexibility (see Howell, 1992; Brodsky, 1994; Faux, 1995a,b). Measures to enable firms to adapt to changing markets is argued to be the necessary economic response to heightened international competition. Labour market flexibility has been depicted as a crucial dimension of this process (Brown, 1991; Curry, 1992).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Albelda, R. and Tilly, C., ‘Towards a broader vision: race, gender, and labor market segmentation in the social structure of accumulation framework’, in D.M. Kotz, T. McDonough and M. Reich (eds), Social Structures of Accumulation: The Political Economy of Growth and Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Appelbaum, E., ‘New work systems in the new world order’, in L. Mishel and J. Schmitt (eds), Beware the US Model: Jobs and Wages in a Deregulated Economy. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute, 1995.
Armstrong, P., ‘The feminization of the labour force: harmonizing down in a global economy’, in I. Bakker (ed.), Rethinking Restructuring: Gender and Change in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1996.
Badgett, M.V. and Williams, R.M., ‘The changing contours of discrimination: race, gender, and structural economic change’, in M.A. Bernstein and D.E. Adler (eds), Understanding American Economic Decline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Bakker, I., ‘Pay equity and economic restructuring: the polarization of policy?’, in J. Fudge and P. McDermott (eds), Just Wages: a Feminist Assessment of Pay Equity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1991.
Bakker, I., ‘Introduction: the gendered foundations of restructuring in Canada’, in I. Bakker (ed.), Rethinking Restructuring: Gender and Change in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1996a.
Bakker, I., Rethinking Restructuring: Gender and Change in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1996b.
Berger, B., ‘Comparable worth at odds with American realities’, in US Commission on Civil Rights (ed.), Comparable Worth: Issue for the 80’s. Washington, DC, 1984.
Bergmann, B.R., ‘What the common economic arguments against comparable worth are worth’, Journal of Social Issues 45 (Fall 1989) 67–80.
Bergren, O.V., ‘A business viewpoint on comparable worth’, in P. Schlafly (ed.), Equal Pay for Unequal Work. Washington, DC: Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, 1984.
Blecker, R.A., ‘The new economic stagnation and the contradictions of economic policy making’, in M.A. Bernstein and D.E. Adler (eds), Understanding American Economic Decline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Block, F., Postindustrial Possibilities: a Critique of Economic Discourse. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.
Bowles, S., Gordon, D.M. and Weisskopf, T.E., ‘Business ascendancy and economic impasse: a structural retrospective on conservative economics’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 3 (Winter 1989) 107–34.
Brodsky, M.M., ‘Labor market flexibility: a changing international perspective’, Monthly Labor Review 117 (November 1994) 53–60.
Brown, D., ‘An institutionalist look at postmodernism’, Journal of Economic Issues 25 (December 1991) 1089–104.
Burk, M. and Hartmann, H., ‘Beyond the gender gap’, The Nation 262 (10 June 1996) 18–21.
Çağatay, N. and Özler, S., ‘Feminization of the labor force: the effects of long-term development and structural adjustment’, World Development 23(11) (1995) 1883–94.
Cohen, M.G., ‘The implications of economic restructuring for women: the Canadian situation’, in I. Bakker (ed.), The Strategic Silence: Gender and Economic Policy. London: Zed Books, 1994.
Curry, J., ‘The flexibility fetish: a review essay on flexible specialization’, Capital and Class 50 (1992) 99–125.
Faux, J., Preface, in L. Mishel and J. Schmitt, Beware the U.S. Model: Jobs and Wages in a Deregulated Economy. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute, 1995a, ix–xii.
Faux, J., ‘Social democracy and the global marketplace’, in L. Mishel and J. Schmitt (eds), Beware the U.S. Model: Jobs and Wages in a Deregulated Economy. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute, 1995b, 3–14.
Figart, D.M. and Kahn, P., Contesting the Market: Pay Equity and the Politics of Economic Restructuring. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1997.
Figart, D.M. and Lapidus, J., ‘A gender analysis of US labor market policies for the working poor’, Feminist Economics 1(3) (1995) 60–81.
Fraser, N. and Gordon, L., ‘A genealogy of dependency: tracing a keyword of the US welfare state’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 19 (Winter 1994) 309–36.
Garza, M.M., ‘Wage warriors’, Chicago Tribune (9 May 1996).
Geoghegan, T., ‘The state of the worker’, New York Times (25 January 1996).
Greenwood, D., ‘The institutional inadequacy of the free market in determining comparable worth’, Journal of Economic Issues 18 (June 1984) 457–64.
Harrison, B. and Bluestone, B., ‘Wage polarisation in the US and the “flexibility” debate’, Cambridge Journal of Economics 14 (September 1990) 351–73.
Hildebrand, G., ‘The market system’, in E.R. Livernash (ed.), Comparable Worth: Issues and Alternatives. Washington, DC: Equal Employment Advisory Council, 1980.
Howell, C., ‘The dilemmas of post-Fordism: socialists, flexibility, and labor market deregulation in France’, Politics & Society 20 (March 1992) 71–99.
Jenson, J., ‘Part-time employment and women: a range of strategies’, in I. Bakker (ed.) Rethinking Restructuring: Gender and Change in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1996.
Jenson, J., Hagen, E. and Reddy, C., Feminization of the Labor Force. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.
Kotz, D.M., ‘The regulation theory and the social structure of accumulation approach’, in D.M. Kotz, T. McDonough and M. Reich, Social Structures of Accumulation: the Political Economy of Growth and Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Kuttner, R., ‘A decent minimum wage’, Washington Post (29 January 1995).
Mitter, S., Common Fate, Common Bond: Women in the Global Economy. London: Pluto Press, 1986.
Mitter, S., ‘On organising women in casualised work: a global overview’, in S. Rowbotham and S. Mitter (eds), Dignity and Daily Bread. London: Routledge, 1994.
Mutari, E., ‘Women’s employment patterns during the inter-war period: a comparison of two states’, Feminist Economics 2 (2, Summer 1996) 107–27.
Nelson, B.A., Opton, Jr, E.M. and Wilson, T.E., ‘Wage discrimination and Title VII in the 1980s: the case against comparable worth’, Employee Relations Law Journal 6(3) (1980) 380–405.
O’Hara, P.A., ‘An institutionalist review of long wave theories: Schumpeterian innovation, modes of regulation, and social structures of accumulation’, Journal of Economic Issues 28 (June 1994) 489–500.
O’Hara, P.A., ‘Household labor, the family, and macroeconomic instability in the United States: 1940s–1990s’, Review of Social Economy 53 (Spring 1995) 89–120.
O’Neill, J., ‘An argument against comparable worth’, in US Commission on Civil Rights (ed.), Comparable Worth: Issues for the 80’s. Washington, DC., 1984a.
O’Neill, J., ‘The “comparable worth” trap’, in P. Schlafly (ed.), Equal pay for UNequal Work. Washington, DC: Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, 1984b.
O’Neill, J.E., ‘The shrinking pay gap’, The Wall Street Journal (7 October 1994) A10.
Paul, E.F., Equity and Gender: the Comparable Worth Debate, New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1989.
Peterson, J., ‘The challenge of comparable worth: an institutionalist view’, Journal of Economic Issues 24 (June 1990) 605–12.
Peterson, J., ‘Public policy and the economic status of women in the United States’, Journal of Economic Issues 26 (June 1992) 441–8.
Rabkin, J., ‘Comparable worth as civil rights policy: potentials for disaster’, in US Commission on Civil Rights (ed.), Comparable Worth: Issue for the 80’s. Washington, DC, 1984.
Rhoads, S.E., ‘Pay equity won’t go away’, Across the Board (July/August 1993a) 37–41.
Rhoads, S.E., ‘Would decentralized comparable worth work?’ the case of the United Kingdom’, Regulation: The Cato Review of Business and Government No. 3 (1993b) 65–70.
Rosenberg, S., ‘From segmentation to flexibility: a selective survey’, Review of Radical Political Economics 23 (Spring & Summer 1991) 71–9.
Rubin, R.E., Brown, R., Reich, R.B., Stiglitz, J.E. and D’Andrea Tyson, L., ‘What’s a minimum wage job worth? Up to a living wage’, Wall Street Journal (1 April 1996).
Rutten, T., ‘Inner cities in need of living wage’, Los Angeles Times (2 August 1991).
Snow, E., ‘Comparable worth or pay equity?’, The Washington Times (2 August 1985).
Standing, G., ‘Global feminization through flexible labor’, World Development 17 (July 1989) 1077–95.
Steinberg, R., ‘The comparable worth debate’, New Politics 1 (Spring 1986) 108–26.
Tyson, J.L., ‘“Living wage” drive accelerates in cities’, Christian Science Monitor (10 April 1996).
Uchitelle, L., ‘Some cities pressuring employers to raise wages of working poor’, New York Times (9 April 1996).
Williams, F., ‘Social relations, welfare, and the post-Fordism debate’, in R. Burrows and B. Loader (eds), Towards a Post-Fordist Welfare State? London: Routledge, 1994.
Williams, R.E. and Kessler, L.L., A Closer Look at Comparable Worth, Washington, DC: National Foundation for the Study of Employment Policy, 1984.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1999 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Figart, D., Mutari, E. (1999). Global Feminization and Flexible Labour Markets: Gendered Discourse in the Opposition to Pay Equity Reform. In: Gregory, J., Sales, R., Hegewisch, A. (eds) Women, Work and Inequality. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333983331_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333983331_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-40487-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-333-98333-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)