Abstract
The trajectory of pay equity reform for workers employed by the State of Michigan illuminates the project of public sector pay equity in the United States as a whole.1 Pay equity policy in the US has been concentrated in the public sector, especially in state civil services. In the absence of federal law prohibiting unequal pay for work of equal value, the private sector has been unwilling to raise wages through pay equity adjustments. More densely unionized than workers in the private sector, women in the public sector have been able to make alliances with feminists in the state bureaucracies and legislatures to win wage reforms (Evans and Nelson, 1989). In addition, state managers, traditionally reliant on elaborate personnel systems employing job evaluation, have been relatively receptive to comparable worth arguments and techniques (Johnston, 1994).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Acker, J., Doing Comparable Worth: Gender, Class and Pay Equity. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1989.
Blank, R.M., ‘Are part-time jobs bad jobs?’, in G. Burtless (ed.), A Future of Lousy Jobs? The Changing Structure of US Wages. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1990.
Blum, L., Between Feminism and Labour: the Significance of the Comparable Worth Movement. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991.
Callaghan, P. and Hartmann, H., Contingent Work: a Chart Book on Part-time and Temporary Employment. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute, 1991.
Cobble, D.S., ‘Postindustrial unionism possible’, in S. Friedman, R.W. Hurd, R.O. Oswald and R.L. Seeber (eds), Restoring the Promise of American Labor Law. Ithaca, New York: ILR Press, 1994.
Evans, S. and Nelson, B., Wage Justice: Comparable Worth and the Paradox of Technocratic Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.
Figart, D.M. and Kahn, P., Contesting the Market: Pay Equity and the Politics of Economic Restructuring. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1997.
Figart, D.M. and Lapidus, J., ‘A gender analysis of labour market policies for the working poor in the US’, Feminist Economics 1(3) (Fall 1995).
Fudge, J., ‘The gendered dimension of labour law: why women need inclusive unionism and broader-based bargaining’, in P. McDermott and L. Bresleen (eds), Women Challenging Unions. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1993.
Fudge, J. and McDermott, P. (eds), Just Wages: a Feminist Assessment of Pay Equity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1991.
Gregory, J., ‘Equal value/comparable worth: national statute and case law in Britain and the USA’, in P. Kahn and E. Meehan (eds), Equal Value/Comparable Worth in the UK and USA. London: Macmillan; and New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1992.
Hartmann, H, and Aaronson, S., ‘Pay equity and women’s wage increases: success in the States, a model for the nation’, Duke Journal of Gender Law and Policy (1) 69–87 (1994).
Institute for Women’s Policy Research (IWPR), The Status of Women in the State of Michigan. Washington, DC: IWPR, 1996.
Jarman, J., ‘Which way forward? assessing the current proposals to amend the British Equal Pay Act’, Work, Employment, and Society vol. 8, no. 2 (1994) 243–54.
Johnston, P., Success While Others Fail: Social Movement Unionism and the Public Workplace. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, 1994.
Kahn, P. and Meehan, E. (eds), Equal Value/Comparable Worth in the UK and USA. London: Macmillan, 1992.
Lapidus, J. and Figart, D.M., ‘Comparable worth as an anti-poverty strategy: evidence from the March 1992 CPS’, Review of Radical Political Economics 26 (3 September 1994) 1–10.
McCann, M., Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
Michigan Comparable Worth Task Force (CWTF), The Report of the Comparable Worth Task Force to the Michigan Civil Service Commission. Lansing, June 1985.
Michigan Department of Commerce, The Michigan Economy, 1979–1990. Lansing, 1991.
National Committee on Pay Equity (NCPE), Pay Equity Activity in the Public Sector, 1979–1989. Washington, DC: NCPE, 1989.
National Committee on Pay Equity (NCPE), Newsnotes. Various dates.
Remick, H., ‘The case of comparable in Washington State’, Policy Studies Review 5 (1986) 838–48.
Sacks, K.B., Caring by the Hour: Women, Work and Organizing at Duke Medical Center. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1988.
Sarri, R., Butts, J., Morrow, P., Russell, C. and Zinn, D., Women in Michigan: a Statistical Portrait. Lansing and Ann Arbor: Michigan Women’s Commission, Michigan Equal Employment Opportunity Council, and University of Michigan Institute for Social Research, September 1987.
Sorensen, E., Comparable Worth: Is it a Worthy Policy? Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.
Steinberg, R., Mainstreaming Comparable Worth: Reforming Wage Discrimination to Palatable Pay Equity. Unpublished manuscript, 1989.
Steinberg, R., ‘Social construction of skill: gender, power and comparable worth’, Work and Occupations (17) (1990) 449–82.
Steinberg, R., ‘Job evaluation and managerial control: the politics of technique and the techniques of politics’, in J. Fudge and P. McDermott (eds), Just Wages: a Feminist Assessment of Pay Equity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1991.
Steinberg, R., ‘Gendered instructions: cultural lag and gender bias in the Hay system of job evaluation’, Work and Occupations (19) (1992) 387–432.
Young, A., A Comparable Worth Study of the State of Michigan Job Classifications. Detroit: Arthur Young and Company, 1981.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1999 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kahn, P., Figart, D. (1999). Public Sector Reforms in a Changing Economic and Political Climate: Lessons from Michigan. In: Gregory, J., Sales, R., Hegewisch, A. (eds) Women, Work and Inequality. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333983331_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333983331_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-40487-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-333-98333-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)