Skip to main content

The Politics of Interdependence — Risk and Uncertainty in the City-Region

  • Chapter
Book cover Cities in Transition

Abstract

This chapter addresses the theme of Local Issues and Global Implications. Its thesis is that towards the end of the twentieth century successful cities must reflect, and at the same time reinforce, a regional identity since, with the possible exception of the largest world cities — of which there is only one in Britain — cities are too small to create a sense of economic or political identity appropriate to the twenty-first century. In terms of politics and governance the issue is whether the locality — the city-region in general but the Bristol city-region in particular — has sufficient political and administrative capacity to secure the necessary coordination and control for ‘global’ competition, yet is also sufficiently flexible to sustain the ‘local’ identity necessary for success in that competition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • K. Bassett, ‘Partnerships, business elites and urban politics: new forms of governance in an English city’, Urban Studies, 33 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Bradbury and J. Mawson (eds), British Regionalism and Devolution (London: Jessica Kingsley, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • City Region Campaign, Building a New Britain: an Alternative Democratic Vision for the United Kingdom and its Constitution (London: The City Region Campaign, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Clements, Local Notables and the City Council (London: Macmillan, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • The Constitution Unit, Regional Government in England (London: The Constitution Unit, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Coombes, ‘Definition of city regions in the United Kingdom’, Appendix to Building a New Britain: an Alternative Democratic Vision for the United Kingdom and its Constitution (London: The City Region Campaign, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • L. DeGroot, ‘City Challenge: competing in the urban regeneration game’, Local Economy, 7:3 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment, Index of Local Conditions (London: DoE, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, Regeneration Programmes: The Way Forward (London, DETR, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. DiGaetano, ‘Urban governing alignments and realignments in comparative perspective: developmental politics in Boston, Massachusetts, and Bristol, England 1980–86’, Urban Affairs Review, 32:6 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission, Europe 2000+ Co-operation for European Territorial Development (Luxembourg: Office for the Official Publications of the European Commission, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, Report of the Machinery of Government Committee (The Haldane Report), Cmnd 9230 (London: HMSO, 1918).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Harding, R. Evans, M. Parkinson and P. Garside, Regional Government in Britain: an Economic Solution (Bristol: The Policy Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Heclo and A. Wildavsky, The Private Government of Public Money (London: Macmillan, 1981).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • B.W. Hogwood, The Integrated Regional Offices and the Single Regeneration Budget, Research Paper 13 (Commission for Local Democracy, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • B.W. Hogwood, Mapping the Regions: Boundaries, Co-ordination and Government (Bristol: The Policy Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. John and A. Whitehead (eds), ‘Regionalism in England: current trends and future prospects’, Policy and Politics, 25:1 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Strategic Planning and Transportation Unit, Service Plan and Budget 1996–97 and 1997–98 (Bristol: Joint Committee for Strategic Planning and Transportation, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. King, ‘Economic activity and the challenge to local government’, in D. King and J. Pierre (eds), Challenges to Local Government (London: Sage,1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Leach, ‘The missing regional dimension to the local government review’, Regional Studies, 28:8 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Local Government Commission, Renewing Local Government in the English Shires: A Progress Report (London: HMSO, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Malpass, ‘Policy making and local governance: how Bristol failed to secure City Challenge funding (twice)’, Policy and Politics, 22:4 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Mawson et al., The Single Regeneration Budget: Stocktake: A Review of Challenge Round II (Birmingham: Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, University of Birmingham, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • D.C. Miller, ‘Decision making cliques in community power structures: a comparative study of an American and an English City’, American Journal of Sociology, LXI (1958a).

    Google Scholar 

  • D.C. Miller, ‘Industry and community power structure: a comparative study of an American and an English city’, American Sociological Review, XXIII (1958b).

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Oatley and C. Lambert, ‘Evaluating competitive urban policy: the City Challenge Initiative’, in R. Hambleton and H. Thomas (eds), Urban Policy Evaluation (London: Paul Chapman Publishing, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Roberts, Regional Strategy and Partnership in European Programmes: Experience in Four UK Regions (York: York Publishing Services, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Senior, The Royal Commission on Local Government in England 1966–1969 Report, Cmnd 4040, Vol. II (Memorandum of Dissent) (London: HMSO, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Snape and M. Stewart, Keeping up the Momentum: Partnership in Bristol and the West of England, Report to the Bristol Chamber of Commerce and Initiative (Bristol, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • South West Regional Planning Conference, Revised Regional Strategy: Priority Issues Report (Taunton: South West Regional Planning Conference, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Stewart, ‘Between Whitehall and town hall: the realignment of urban regeneration policy in England’, Policy and Politics, 22:2 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Stewart, ‘The politics of local complacency’, Journal of Urban Affairs, 18:2 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Stewart, The Work of the Local Government Commission for England 1991–96, Joseph Rowntree Foundation (York: York Publishing Services, 1997a).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Stewart, ‘The shifting institutional framework’, in J. Bradbury and J. Mawson (eds), British Regionalism and Devolution (London: Jessica Kingsley, 1997b).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Stewart and J. Underwood, ‘Inner cities policy’, in K. Young and C. Mason (eds), Urban Economic Development (London: Macmillan, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1999 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stewart, M. (1999). The Politics of Interdependence — Risk and Uncertainty in the City-Region. In: Blanke, B., Smith, R. (eds) Cities in Transition. Anglo-German Foundation for The Study of Industrial Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333982273_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics