Skip to main content
  • 61 Accesses

Abstract

It is perhaps time to summarize the argument. I began with the proposition that, in the terms of historical materialism, the state should be located within the production relations (the base), along with other production relations like capital itself. The state ‘relation’ pre-dates capitalism, and brings with it motives of survival, expansion and aggrandisement. For a time, state and capital maintained a contingent relationship of mutual advantage — for as long as the development of capitalism was synonymous with that of the national state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See (among others) A. H. Amsden et al., The Market Meets Its Match, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ha Joon Chang and Peter Nolan (eds.), The Transformation of the Communist Economies — Against the Mainstream, London: Macmillan, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  3. Peter Nolan, China’s Rise, Russia’s Fall, Houndmills: Macmillan, 1995.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. See Ewa Berard-Zarzicka, ‘The Authoritarian Perestroika Debate’, Telos, No. 84, Summer 1990, pp. 115–41.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. V. Barabanov, ‘Strukturnaya politika — delo gosudarstvo’, Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodoye otnosheniye, No. 10, 1992, pp. 55–68 at pp. 60, 64, 65.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Peter Rutland, ‘A Twisted Path Toward a Market Economy’, Transition, 15 February 1995, pp. 12–18 at p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. Starodubrovskaya, ‘Financial-Industrial Groups: Illusions and Reality’, Communist Economies and Economic Transformation, 7 (1), 1995, pp. 5–19 at p. 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. V. Filatov, ‘Problemy investitsionnoi politiki v industrial’noi ekonomike perekhodnogo tipa’, Voprosy ekonomiki, No. 7, July 1994, pp. 4–12 at pp. 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nigel Harris, National Liberation, London: I.B. Tauris, 1990, pp. 281–2.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, Manifesto of the Communist Party, Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1966, p. 40

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. A. Cohen: Karl Marx’s Theory of History, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991, p. 193; G. Lukacs, ‘… bourgeois revolutions are drawing the consequences of an almost completed economic and social process in a society whose feudal and absolutist structure has been profoundly undermined… by the vigorous upsurge of capitalism’ (quoted in Alex Callinicos, ‘Bourgeois Revolutions and Historical Materialism’, International Socialism, No. 43, June 1989, pp. 113–71 at p. 125.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karl Marx, ‘Preface’ to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, Moscow: Progess Publishers, 1970, p. 182.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brian Manning, The English People and the English Revolution, London: Bookmarks, 1991, p. 230.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, The German Ideology, New York: International Publishers, 1973, p. 82. See also Marx and Engels, Manifesto: ‘… the modern bourgeoisie is itself the product of a long course of development, of a series of revolutions in the modes of production and exchange’ (p. 37).

    Google Scholar 

  15. World Bank, World Development Report 1995: Workers in an Integrating World, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, p. 62.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. See Doug Henwood, ‘How Jobless the Future?’, Left Business Observer, No. 75, December 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jan Breman, ‘Labour Get Lost: a Late-Capitalist Manifesto’, Economic and Political Weekly, 30 (37), 16 September 1995, pp. 2294–300. See also the World Bank’s useful prescription for domestic policies likely to attract FDI (World Development Report 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stanley Aronowitz and William Difazio, The Jobless Future: Sci-Tech and the Dogma of Work, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994, p. 310.

    Google Scholar 

  19. On the socialized state see Nigel Harris, The New Untouchables, London: Penguin, 1995, pp. 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dick Bryan, The Chase Across the Globe, Boulder: Westview Press, 1995, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Doug Henwood, ‘Work and its Future’, Left Business Observer, No. 72, April 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2000 David Lockwood

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lockwood, D. (2000). Conclusion. In: The Destruction of the Soviet Union. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333981566_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics