Abstract
The courts of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) have operated only since 3 July 1997, and in that time only a handful of cases of much constitutional significance have been decided. The first, and arguably the most significant so far, was HKSAR v. David Ma Wai-kwan [1997] HKLRD 761. In that case the Court of Appeal (sitting to determine questions of law reserved by the Court of First Instance) discussed the continuity of the British Hong Kong legal system into the HKSAR period and the constitutional validity of the provisional legislature. It is proposed in this paper to consider these primary questions. (On other aspects of the case, see Chan 1997b and Watson-Brown 1998.)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Allan, T. 1997 ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty: Law, Politics, and Revolution’. Law Quarterly Review 113: 443.
Chan, J. 1997a ‘The Jurisdiction and Legality of the Provisional Legislative Council’. Hong Kong Law Journal 27(3): 374–387.
Chan, J. 1997b ‘Amicus Curiae and Non-Party Intervention’. Hong Kong Law Journal 27(3): 391–404.
Chen, A. 1997a ‘The Provisional Legislative Council of the SAR’. Hong Kong Law Journal 27(1): 1–11.
Chen, A. 1997b ‘Legal Preparation for the Establishment of the Hong Kong SAR: Chronology and Selected Documents’. Hong Kong Law Journal 27(3): 405–431.
Chen, A. 1997c ‘The Concept of Justiciability and the Jurisdiction of the Hong Kong Courts’, Hong Kong Law Journal 27(3): 387–390 (an abridged version appeared in the South China Morning Post, 5 August).
Fung, D. 1997 ‘A Win for the Rule of Law’. South China Morning Post, 1 August.
Gunter, J. 1997 ‘HKSAR v. Ma: The Basic Law “Shall Be” Given a Purposive Interpretation’. The Loophole (newsletter of the Commonwealth Legislative Council Association) December 1997: 38.
Harris, J. 1997 ‘China, Hong Kong and Divided Sovereignty after 1997’, in Krawietz, W., Pattaro, E. and Erh-Soon Tay, A. (eds) Rule of Law: Political and Legal Systems in Transition. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.
Jordan, A. 1997 ‘Lost in the Translation: Two Legal Cultures, the Common Law Judiciary and the Basic Law of the Hong Kong SAR’. Cornell International Law Journal 30: 335.
Kay, R. 1998 ‘Sovereignty in the New Hong Kong’. Law Quarterly Review 114: 189. Watson-Brown, A. 1998 ‘Do We Still Need “Shall"?’ Hong Kong Law Journal 28(1): 29–44.
Wesley-Smith, P. 1994 Constitutional and Administrative Law in Hong Kong, 2nd edn. Hong Kong: Longman Asia.
Wesley-Smith, P. 1997 ‘The SAR Constitution: Law or Politics?’, Hong Kong Law Journal 27(2): 125–129.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2000 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wesley-Smith, P. (2000). Constitutional Dilemmas in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. In: Ash, R., Ferdinand, P., Hook, B., Porter, R. (eds) Hong Kong in Transition. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333977262_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333977262_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-41573-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-333-97726-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)