Abstract
Although discontinuous histories and multiple temporalities surely coexist within the restless landscapes of the global postmodern, the term postmodernism itself, and therefore its temper, remain curiously static. It is forever mired in definition by negation, in belatedness—“as an afterthought to modernism—”or, as Fredric Jameson memorably puts it, in “an eternal present and much further away an inevitable catastrophe.”1 We find ourselves alive after the end of history, philosophy, and metaphysics; the death of the subject, the author, and the book; the waning of the historical avant-gardes, the bankruptcy of Enlightenment promises of progress through rationality. We affirm our suspicion of metanarratives, foundational assumptions, totalizing theories, utopian ambitions, large-scale pronouncements of any kind. Art speaks in pastiche, repeating the forms of the past since, as Raymond Federman puts it, “imagination does not invent the SOMETHING-NEW we often attribute to it but rather now … merely imitates, copies, repeats, proliferates, plagiarizes … what has always been there.”2 Few of us actually believe in the progressive possibilities arising from our “new” world order, and we lack a sense of agency; therefore, pursuing what might be genuinely new becomes increasingly impossible. Within the condition of postmodernity, the future presents itself as foreclosed if it presents itself at all; the year 2000 has already happened.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Fredric Jameson, The Seeds of Time (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994): 72.
Raymond Federman, “Imagination as Plagiarism [an unfinished paper …],” New Literary History7, No. 3 (Spring 1976).
Ernst Bloch, The Principle of Hope, Vol. 1, trans. Neville Plaice, Stephen Plaice, and Paul Knight (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986): 6–8.
Homi Bhabha, The Location of Culture (New York: Routledge, 1994): 218–19.
Arjun Appadurai, Modernity at Large (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997): 4.
Quoted in Jon Bird et al., Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change (New York: Routledge, 1993): 271.
Julie Thompson Klein, Crossing Boundaries, Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1996): 1–2.
Copyright information
© 1999 Ellen E. Berry, Mikhail N. Epstein
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Berry, E.E. (1999). How Does Newness Enter the Postmodern World?. In: Transcultural Experiments. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780312299712_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780312299712_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42157-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-312-29971-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)