Abstract
Grosseteste was perhaps the first medieval Latin-speaker to comment extensively on Posterior Analytics. There are references, however, to Postenor Analytic:, in the period immediately before Grosseteste, though these references show no extensive use, familiarity, or grasp of the text. Grosseteste himself was an incredibly productive translator and commentator, addressing himself extensively to the Bible, the works of Pseudo Dionysius, as well as several texts of Aristotle—most notably the Ethics. However, it is because Grosseteste became the first lecturer to the Franciscans at Oxford (as well as Oxford’s first chancellor) that his influence was felt as deeply and as long as it was.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Robertus Grosseteste, Commeniamn in Pareriomm Analy’acomm Libros, edited by Pietro Rossi (Firenze: Leo S. Olschki, 1981). pp. 111ff.
Ibid. For a somewhat different gloss on tliis passage, cf. James McEvoy, The Ptäiosopky of Roben Grosseteste (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982). pp. 64–67
Copyright information
© 2002 Richard A. Lee
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lee, R.A. (2002). Divine Ideas, Aristotelian Science: Robert Grosseteste and the Theory of Scientia. In: Science, the Singular, and the Question of Theology. The New Middle Ages. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780312299125_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780312299125_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38731-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-312-29912-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)