Skip to main content

“Inconclusion”—Why Real Reform Might Not Be Possible

  • Chapter
Why Peacekeeping Fails
  • 364 Accesses

Abstract

As described in chapter one, today peacekeeping is more necessary, more desired, and more possible than ever before. Because of the change in the nature of the world’s conflicts, it has also become much harder to do. In its early years, the UN was most often confronted with interstate wars. Classical peacekeeping in such situations meant the UN simply had to separate two conventional armies belonging to two states along well-defined battle lines in a specific area. The UN then had only to monitor a cease-fire until the parties could negotiate a permanent peace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 48.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Solarz and O’Hanlon suggest the death rate should exceed the murder rate in the United States although it is unclear how this would work in practice since there is never statistical certainty about casualties in the midst of a civil war. See Solarz, S. and O’Hanlon, M. “Humanitarian Intervention: When Is Force Justified?” The Washington Quarterly, Autumn 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. “The Year in Review 1996: UN Peace Missions,” http://www.un.org/Depts/dpko/yir96/peace96.htm.

  3. Applebaum, A. “Is the UN Really Necessary?” The Spectator, July 31, 1995. 4. USIS Wireless File, “Richardson Remarks on New UN Reform Package” and “U.S. Gives UN Reform Plan Tentative Stamp of Approval,” July 16, 1997 and “U.S. Official Praises Annan’s UN Reform Efforts,” August 1,1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pisik, B. “UN Overhaul Disappoints Many,” Washington Times, July 17, 1997, and Robbins, C. “Annan Unveils UN Proposal; It Is Unlikely to Satisfy U.S.,” Wall Street Journal, July 17, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Crossette, B. “Despite Assurances, UN Workers Fear Downsizing,” New York Times, July 18, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goshko, J. “UN Reform Hinges on Competing Interests,” Washington Post, July 21, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Comments by Ghanian Ambassador Jacob Wilmot as quoted in USIS Wireless File, “Secretary General Presents Major UN Reform Package,” July 16, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Muller, J. W. “The Reform of the United Nations,” New York: Oceana Publications, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. “Comprehensive Review of the Whole Question of Peacekeeping Operations in all their Aspects,” Report of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Operations, A/51/130 of May 7, 1996, paragraph 7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. “The Lessons Learned Unit,” http://www.un.org/Depts/dpko-/llu2.htm.

  11. UN Press Release SC/6261 of August 30, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. “Supplement to an Agenda for Peace,” paragraph 77.

    Google Scholar 

  13. “Report of the Special Committee on Peace-keeping Operations,” A/51/ 130 of May 7, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rohter, L. “Haiti’s Woes Persist as UN Troops Depart,” New York Times, December 4, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. UN Security Council Press Release SC/6410 of August 14, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, Western European Union, European Union, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  17. UN Press Releases GA/SPD/96 of November 18, 1996, and GA/PK/145 of April 10, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  18. The current Secretary of State, when she was Ambassador to the UN, paraphrasing the American expression “mean as a junk yard dog,” referred to the Office of Internal Oversight after its first year of existence as a “junk yard puppy,” leaving the impression it lacked teeth and aggressiveness.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Crossette, B. “In War on Corruption and Waste, UN Confronts Well-Entrenched Foe,” International Herald Tribune, November 3, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lindstrom, G. “Building and Developing a National Capacity,” http://www.un.org/Depts/Landmine/NewsLetter/2.

  21. Synge 1997:174. Synge’s employment as a UN consultant may explain his enthusiasm for a strategy that clearly is not key to successful peacekeeping.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Crossette, B. “In War on Corruption and Waste, UN Confronts Well-Entrenched Foe,” International Herald Tribune, November 3, 1997, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Statement to the Special Meeting of the General Assembly on Reform, July 16, 1997, paragraph 115.

    Google Scholar 

  24. “Supplement to an Agenda for Peace,” UN A/50/60-S/1995/1, January 3, 1995, paragraph 46.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sanderson, J. “UNTAC: Debriefing and Lessons-The Military Component View,” International Peacekeeping, February–May 1995, p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Righter, R. Utopia Lost:The United Nations and World Order, New York: Twentieth Century Fund Press, 1995, p. 339.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chayes, A. “Beyond Reform: Restructuring for More Effective Conflict Intervention,” Global Governance, May-August 1997, p. 117.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Flores, T. “ONUSAL—A Precedent for Future UN Missions?” International Peacekeeping, December 1994–January 1995, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Aspen Institute, “Honoring Human Rights and Keeping the Peace—Lessons from El Salvador, Cambodia and Haiti,” p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Makinda, S. “Sovereignty and International Security: Challenges for the UN,” Global Governance, May–August 1996, p. 164.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Durch, W. Handbook on UN Peace Operations, Washington: Henry L. Stimson Center, 1995, p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Crossette, B. “US Effort to Reduce Its UN Dues Dies,” New York Times, December 19, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rupert, J. “U.S. Troops Teach Peacekeeping to Africans,” Washington Post, September 26, 1997, page A16.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hartnack, M. “OAU Peacekeeping Plan,” Business Day, October 22, 1997, p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  35. UN Press Release NGO/300 PI/1033 of September 15, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rupert, J. “Acting More Independently, African Nations Quicker to Intervene,” Washington Post, October 21, 1997, page A14.

    Google Scholar 

  37. UN Press Release GA/SPD/96 of November 18, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1999 Dennis C. Jett

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jett, D.C. (1999). “Inconclusion”—Why Real Reform Might Not Be Possible. In: Why Peacekeeping Fails. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780312292744_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics