Out from the Cold: Peaceful Democratization in Hungary, Poland, and the Czech Republic

  • Beat Kernen


Democratization is a process that may endure for a long time and that cannot be followed according to a well-tested recipe or theory. It includes, therefore, many caveats, vagaries, and a strong element of unpredictability for any political system that finds itself in the transition from a non-democratic past to some form of democratic future.


Czech Republic Communist Party Party System Coalition Government Parliamentary Election 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Samuel P. Huntington, Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968);Google Scholar
  2. Ralph M. Goldman, “The Nominating Process: Factionalism as a Force for Democratization,” in Gary D. Wekkin et al., Building Democracy in One-Party Systems: Theoretical Problems and Cross-Nation Experiences (Westport, CT: Praeger, 1993), p. 47–69.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jaroslaw Piekalkiewicz & Alfred W. Payne, Politics of Ideocracy (New York: SUNY Press, 1995).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Judith Pataki, “Hungarians Dissatisfied with Political Changes,” in Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) Research Report (6 November 1992): p. 66–67.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Listed as “situational preconditions” in Sabrina P. Ramet, “Balkan Pluralism and Its Enemies,” in Orbis (fall 1992): p. 547–564. For other sources of Ramet’s criteria of democracy, see: Aristotle’s Politics; Alvin Rabushka & Kenneth Shepsle, Politics in Plural Societies: A Theory of Democratic Instability (Columbia, Ohio: Merrill, 1992);Google Scholar
  6. Guglielmo Ferrero, The Principles of Power (New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1942);Google Scholar
  7. Huntington, Political Order in Changing Societies; Crane Brinton, Anatomy of a Revolution (New York: Vintage Books, 1964);Google Scholar
  8. Valerie Bunce, “Rising Above the Past: The Struggle for Liberal Democracy in Eastern Europe,” in Sabrina P. Ramet, ed., Adaptation and Transformation in Communist and Post-Communist Systems (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  9. 6.
    Free elections are one of several “institutional preconditions” according to Ramet, “Balkan Pluralism and Its Enemies.” For other definitions of democracy see: Wekkin et al., Building Democracy in One-Party Systems, p. 9–10; Georg Sorensen, Democracy and Democratization (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993), p. 13.Google Scholar
  10. 7.
    For data on the election outcome, see: Barnabas Racz, “Political Pluralization in Hungary: The 1990 Elections,” in Soviet Studies, vol. XLIII, no. 1 (1991): p. 107–136. On the 1989 electoral law, see: Istvan Kukorelli, “The Birth, Testing, and Results of the 1989 Hungarian Election Law,” p. 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 8.
    Barnabas Racz, “The Hungarian Parliament’s Rise and Challenges,” in RFE/RL Research Report (14 February 1992): p. 23.Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    “Gypsies Suffering in Hungary’s Shift,” in New York Times (7 November 1993); “Boross: Ethnic Conflict Not Behind Gypsy Deaths,” Nepszabadsag (15 September 1992), as translated in Foreign Broadcast Information Service (FBIS) (29 September 1992); U.S. State Department, Human Rights Report 1992 (Washington, D.C.: state Department, 1993).Google Scholar
  13. 21.
    Ibid. For results and analyses of the 1994 elections, see: Edith Oltay, “Former Communists Win First Round of Hungarian Elections,” in RFE/RL Research Report (27 May 1994);Google Scholar
  14. Edith Oltay, “The Former Communists’ Election Victory in Hungary,” in RFE/RL Research Report (24 June 1994).Google Scholar
  15. 23.
    See: Anne Applebaum, “The Fall and Rise of the Communists,” in Foreign Affairs, vol. 73, no. 6 (November–December 1994): p. 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 26.
    Louisa Vinton, “‘Outsider’ Parties and the Political Process in Poland,” in RFE/RL Research Report, vol. 3, no. 3 (21 January 1994): p. 14.Google Scholar
  17. 28.
    Ibid., p. 8; Janusz L. Mucha, “Democratization and Cultural Minorities: The Polish Case of the 1980s–1990s,” in East European Quarterly, vol. XXV, no. 4 (January 1992): p. 472.Google Scholar
  18. 31.
    Millard, Frances, “The Polish Parliamentary Elections of October 1991,” in Soviet Studies, vol. 44, no. 5 (September 1992): p. 837–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 32.
    Barry Newman, “As Election Day Nears, Governing Politicians in Poland Wonder Where They Went Wrong,” in Wall Street Journal (16 September 1993).Google Scholar
  20. 33.
    Steven Silber, “Polish Premier Finally Opts for Privatization,” in Christian Science Monitor (spring 1994).Google Scholar
  21. 35.
    Aleksandr Kuranov, “Eastern Europe’s Pink Tide,” in Nezavisimaya Gazeta (July 1994), translated in World Press Review (August 1994).Google Scholar
  22. 37.
    Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, “Human Rights and Democratization in Poland,” p. 9–10; Kuranov, “Eastern Europe’s Pink Tide,” p. 3; John Pomfret, “Poland’s Ex-Communists Say West Aided Win,” in Washington Post (26 September 1993).Google Scholar
  23. 39.
    Marius Janicki, “Two Sides of the Mirror; Parties, Party Leaders, Voters,” Polityka (12 October 1996), as translated in FBIS Daily Report (8 November 1996): p. 2–4. If these preliminary surveys prove correct, Solidarity may once again emerge as the winner and form a coalition government with other “Rightist” parties, whereas the Left Democratic Alliance and the Polish Peasant Party could be pushed into the opposition.Google Scholar
  24. 41.
    Ben Slay, as paraphrased in Paula B. Smith, “The Polish Transition: Economic Success, Political Failure?” in East European Studies (Woodrow Wilson Center) (September–October 1995): p. 2.Google Scholar
  25. 42.
    Ruth Walker, “Poland’s Anticommunists Aim to Rise Again in Presidential Bid,” in Christian Science Monitor (3 November 1995);Google Scholar
  26. Ruth Walker, “Wary of Ex-Communists, Poles Boost Walesa in Vote,” in Christian Science Monitor (7 November 1995); “Walesa by a Neck?” in The Economist (11 November 1995).Google Scholar
  27. 43.
    Marshall Ingwerson and Peter Ford, “Ex-Communists Retake the Helm,” in Christian Science Monitor (21 November 1995).Google Scholar
  28. 44.
    Gregory Pitt, “Fresh Face, Same Agenda,” in Christian Science Monitor (21 November 1995);Google Scholar
  29. George Moffett, “A Cold-War Reality Check: Didn’t Communism Die?” in Christian Science Monitor (6 December 1995).Google Scholar
  30. 52.
    An example was the government’s support for the Lety Archives and protection of the Lety camp, a site from which thousands of Roma were deported to Auschwitz during World War II; H. Kamm, “Havel Calls the Gypsies ‘Litmus Test’,” in New York Times (10 December 1993). Concerning the Roma in the Czech Republic see: Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, “Human Rights and Democratization in the Czech Republic,” p. 18–21.Google Scholar
  31. 60.
    For similar arguments, see: David B. Ottoway, “Czechs Defy Trend in Rebuffing Old Left,” in International Herald Tribune (28–29 May 1994).Google Scholar
  32. 61.
    T. J. Pempel, ed. Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Marco Rimanelli 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beat Kernen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations