Skip to main content

Inequality and Corruption

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Studies in Development Economics and Policy ((SDEP))

Abstract

Successful (or well-ordered) democracies are marked by high levels of trust in people and in government, low levels of economic inequality, and honesty and fairness in the public sphere. Trust in people, as the literature on social capital has shown, is essential for forming bonds among diverse groups in society (Uslaner 2002). Trust in government is essential for political stability and compliance with the law. Corruption robs the economy of funds and leads to less faith in government (perhaps also to less faith in fellow citizens) and thus lower compliance with the law. And institutions seen as biased (unfair) cannot secure compliance and may exacerbate inequalities in society. Transition countries are short on both trust in people and trust in government (Badescu et al. 2003; Hayoz 2003). Under totalitarian regimes, there was little sense of social solidarity. The state was feared rather than legitimate (Howard 2003). Transition countries are also lacking in honest and fair institutions. And they have more than their share of corruption and an underground economy. Many citizens have little faith in their leaders or their fellow citizens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Almond, G. and S. Verba (1963) The Civic Culture, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badescu, G., P. Sum and E.M. Uslaner (2003) ‘Civil Society Development and Democratic Values in Romania and Moldova’, Eastern European Politics and Society, 18: 316–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K. and L. Squire (1996) ‘A New Data Set: Measuring Economic Income Inequality’, World Bank Economic Review, 10: 565–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S., R. LaPorta, F. Lopez-de-Silanes and A. Shleifer (2001) The Practice of Justice, Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, L.P. (2003) ‘Tax Evasion in Switzerland: The Roles of Deterrence and Responsive Regulation’, paper presented at the Conference on Tax Evasion, Trust and State Capabilities, 17–19 October, St Gallen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flap, H. and B. Volker (2003) ‘Communist Societies, the Velvet Revolution, and Weak Ties: The Case of East Germany’, in G. Badescu and E.M. Uslaner (eds), Social Capital and the Transition to Democracy, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, D. (1993) The Sicilian Mafia: The Business of Private Protection, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayoz, N. (2003) ‘Arm’s-Length Relationships, Political Trust, and Transformation in Eastern and Central Europe’, Finance and Common Good, 13/14: 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, M.M. (2003) The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, D.R. and R. Kiewiet (1979) ‘Economic Discontent and Political Behavior: The Role of Personal Grievances and Collective Economic Judgements in Congressional Voting’, American Journal of Political Science, 23: 495–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluegel, J.R. and D.S. Mason (2000a) ‘Market Justice in Transition’, in D.S. Mason and J.L. Kluegel (eds), Marketing Democracy, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluegel, J.R. and D.S. Mason (2000b) ‘Political System Legitimacy: Representative? Fair?’, in D.S. Mason and J.L. Kluegel (eds), Marketing Democracy, Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. (2000) ‘Hidden in an Envelope: Gratitude Payments to Medical Doctors in Hungary’, at www.colbud.hu/honesty-trust/kornai/pub01.PDF

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledeneva, A. (1998) Russia’s Economy of Favours, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leite, C. and J. Weidemann (1999) ‘Does Mother Nature Corrupt? Natural Resources, Corruption, and Economic Growth?’, IMF Working Paper WP/99/85, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateju, P. (1997) ‘Beliefs About Distributive Justice and Social Change: Czech Republic 1991–1995’, Social Trends Working Papers 97–6, Prague: Institute of Sociology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, P. (1997) ‘Why Worry About Corruption?’, Economic Issues, 6, Washington, DC: MF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W.L., A.B. Grodeland and T.Y. Koshechkina (2001) A Culture of Corruption: Coping with Government in Post-Communist Europe, Budapest: CEU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onishi, N. and N. Banerjee (2001) ‘Chad’s Wait for Its Oil Riches May Be Long’, New York Times, 16 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orkeny, A. (2000) ‘Trends in Perceptions of Social Inequality in Hungary, 1991–1996’, in D.S. Mason and J.L. Kluegel (eds), Marketing Democracy, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owsiak, S. (2003) ‘The Ethics of Tax Collection’, Finance and Common Good, 13/14: 65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R.D. (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, J.B., M.V. Rosser and E. Ahmed (2000) ‘Income Inequality and the Informal Economy in Transition Countries’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 28: 156–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B. (2001) ‘Trust, Social Dilemmas, and Collective Memories: On the Rise and Decline of the Swedish Model’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 12: 477–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schemann, S. (2003) ‘In Going Legit, Some Russian Tycoons Resort to Honesty’, New York Times, 12 January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F. (2003) Shadow Economies around the World: What do I know?, Linz-Auhof: University of Linz.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, S. and L. Khakhulina (2000) ‘Russia: Changing Perceptions of Social Justice’, in D.S. Mason and J.L. Kluegel (eds), Marketing Democracy, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sztompka, P. (1999) Trust: A Sociological Inquiry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanzi, V. (1998) ‘Corruption Around the World: Causes, Consequences, Scope and Cures’, IMF Staff Paper 45: 559–594, Washington, DC: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavernise, S. (2003) ‘Russia Is Mostly Unmoved by the Troubles of Its Tycoons’, New York Times, 3 November: A3 (Washington, DC, edn).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T.R. (1990) Why People Obey the Law, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E.M. (2002) The Moral Foundations of Trust, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E.M. (2003) ‘Tax Evasion, Trust, and the Strong Arm of the Law’, paper presented at the Conference on Tax Evasion, Trust and State Capabilities, 17–19 October, St Gallen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E.M. (2004) ‘Trust and Corruption’, in J.G. Lambsdorf, M. Taube and M. Schramm (eds), Corruption and the New Institutional Economics, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E.M. (2005) ‘The Bulging Pocket and the Rule of Law: Corruption, Inequality, and Trust’, paper presented at the Conference on the Quality of Government: What It Is, How to Get It, Why It Matters, 17–19 November, Göteborg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E.M. and G. Badescu (2004) ‘Honesty, Trust, and Legal Norms in the Transition to Democracy: Why Bo Rothstein Is Better Able to Explain Sweden than Romania’, in J. Kornai, S. Rose-Ackerman and B. Rothstein (eds), Creating Social Trust: Problems of Post-Socialist Transition, New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlachova, K. (2000) ‘Economic Justice in the Czech Republic, 1991–1995’, in D.S. Mason and J.L. Kluegel (eds), Marketing Democracy, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zmerli, S., J. Ramón Montero and K. Newton (2003) ‘Trust in People, Confidence in Political Institutions, and Satisfaction with Democracy’, unpublished manuscript, University of Mannheim.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2007 United Nations University

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Uslaner, E.M. (2007). Inequality and Corruption. In: Mavrotas, G., Shorrocks, A. (eds) Advancing Development. Studies in Development Economics and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230801462_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics