Abstract
Neglecting Keynes’s warnings on the opening page of the General Theory proper, Modigliani, Samuelson and Solow fostered a return to the classical theory:
I have called this book the General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, placing the emphasis on the prefix general. The object of such a title is to contrast the character of my arguments and conclusions with those of the classical theory of the subject, upon which I was brought up and which dominates the economic thought, both practical and theoretical, of the governing and academic classes of this generation, as it has for a hundred years past. I shall argue that the postulates of the classical theory are applicable to a special case only and not to the general case, the situation which it assumes being a limiting point of the possible positions of equilibrium. Moreover, the characteristics of the special case assumed by the classical theory happen not to be those of the economic society in which we actually live, with the result that its teaching is misleading and disastrous if we attempt to apply it to the facts of experience. (CW VII, p. 3)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2007 Geoff Tily
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tily, G. (2007). The General Theory and the ‘Facts of Experience’. In: Keynes’s General Theory, the Rate of Interest and ‘Keynesian’ Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230801370_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230801370_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-27701-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-80137-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)