Abstract
The complicated relationship between the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP) is not due to the fact that two affiliated organizations are both trying to provide security policies in the same Euro-Atlantic area. Rather, the most revealing difficulties in their relationship derive from the fact that ESDP is part of a larger quest by European elites to create a more unified and single political identity for Europe. This chapter will examine three areas of ESDP’s development, with special emphasis on how the dynamics of European identity play a key role. In the first place, we will look at European political unification as a sub-theme of the development of the European Union (EU). After World War II, Europe was divided into three identities. Ever since, elites have tried to narrow these gaps over time by bringing the Eastern half of the continent into the European Union and by reducing the North Atlantic influence in Europe’s security and defence. A second perspective examines ESDP as a single case of common policy development that began very incrementally in the 1970s and developed into defence policy only recently. The third vantage point in explaining ESDP focuses mainly on the EU’s attempts to form a geopolitical dimension by combining its external economic, political and security identity outside of Europe.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Mary Fulbrook, ‘Introduction’, Europe since 1945, ed. Mary Fulbrook (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), 5.
Gary Marks et al., Governance in the European Union (London: Sage, 1996).
Steve Marsh and Hans Mackenstein, The International Relations of the European Union (Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education Limited, 2005), 11.
Willem van Eekelen, Debating European Security, 1948–1998 (Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies, 1998), 78.
For a discussion see John Borawski and Thomas-Durell Young, NATO after 2000: the Future of the Euro-Atlantic Alliance (Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, 2001), 99.
This argument is made best by Jolyon Howorth, ‘Why ESDP is Necessary and Beneficial for the Alliance’, in Defending Europe: the EU, NATO, and the Quest for European Autonomy, eds Jolyon Howorth and John T.S. Keeler (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003).
Martin Wight, ‘Chapter Two’, in Power Politics, eds Hedley Bull and Carsten Holbraad (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1978).
Anand Menon, ‘From Crisis to Catharsis: ESDP after Iraq’, International Affairs, 80 (2004): 632.
John van Oudenaren, ‘Transatlantic Bipolarity and the End of Multilateralism’, Political Science Quarterly, 120 (2005): 1–32.
For example, see Michelle Flournoy and Julianne Smith, European Defense Integration: Bridging the Gap between Strategy and Capabilities (Washington DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2005).
Stanley Sloan, NATO, the European Union, and the Atlantic Community: the Transatlantic Bargain Challenged (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc, 2005).
For development of this idea see: Alexander Moens, ‘Thinking Outside the Box: NATO-ESDP Cooperation at Twenty Three’, in NATO and European Security eds Alexander Moens et al. (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003).
Stephen D. Krasner, ‘Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables’, International Organization, 36 (1982), 185.
See also Stephen D. Krasner, International Regimes (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1983).
Paul Cornish, ‘NATO: the Practice and Politics of Transformation’, International Affairs, 80 (2004): 74.
For a speculative road towards such a policy see Alexander Moens, ‘The Road towards a Common Foreign and Security Policy’, Journal of European Integration, XIX (1996): 165–80.
Marta Dassu and Roberto Menotti, ‘Europe and America in the Age of Bush’, Survival, 47 (2005): 108.
For example see Gilles Andréani et al., Europe’s Military Revolution (London: Centre for European Reform, 2001).
See also, Gilles Andréani, ‘Chapter Four’, in European Defence: a Proposal for a White Paper (Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies, 2004).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Alexander Moens
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moens, A. (2007). The Challenges and Limits of NATO-ESDP Synergy. In: Gänzle, S., Sens, A.G. (eds) The Changing Politics of European Security. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230801349_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230801349_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28596-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-80134-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)