Skip to main content

Strategic Partners, Different Strategies: the United States and Canada in the Transatlantic Security Community

  • Chapter
The Changing Politics of European Security

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics ((PSEUP))

  • 71 Accesses

Abstract

On 30 August 1954, the French National Assembly dealt a final blow to the project of a European Defence Community. The EDC, agreed upon by the six founding members of the European Coal and Steel Community in Paris two years before, would have been composed of multinational military forces overseen by a supranational authority. The French rejection of the EDC meant that the US-led North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) took on European security issues alone, while the European Community focused on economic matters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Craig Parsons, A Certain Idea of Europe (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Peter Katzenstein, A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nina Grger, ‘Norway and the EU Security and Defence Dimension: a “Troopsfor-Influence” Strategy’, in The ESDP and the Nordic Countries: Four Variations on a Theme, eds Nina Græger, Henrik Larsen and Hanna Ojanen (Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs, 2003);

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mark Webber, Terry Terriff, Jolyon Howorth and Stuart Croft, ‘The Common European Security and Defence Policy and the “Third-Country” Issue’, European Security, 11 (2002): 75–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bastian Giegerich and William Wallace, ‘Not Such a Soft Power: the External Deployments of European Forces’, Survival, 46 (2004): 163–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. André Dumoulin, R. Mathieu and G. Sarlet, La politique européenne de sécurité et de défense: de l’opératoire à l’identitaire (Brussels: Bruylant, 2003);

    Google Scholar 

  7. Trevor C. Salmon and Alistair J.K. Shepherd, Toward a European Army: a Military Power in the Making? (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Anthony King, ‘Towards a Transnational Europe: the Case of the Armed Forces’, European Journal of Social Theory, 8 (2005): 321–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kori Schake, Constructive Duplication (London: Centre for European Reform, 2002);

    Google Scholar 

  10. Burkard Schmitt, From Cooperation to Integration: Defence and Aerospace Industries in Europe, Chaillot Paper 40 (Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ulrika Mörth and Malena Britz, ‘European Integration as Organizing: the Case of Armaments’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 42 (2004): 957–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jolyon Howorth and John T.S. Keeler (eds), Defending Europe: the EU, NATO, and the Quest for European Autonomy (London: Palgrave, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Parsons, A Certain Idea of Europe; Adrian Treacher, ‘From Civilian Power to Military Power: the EU’s Resistible Transformation’, European Foreign Affairs Review, 9 (2004): 49–66.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas Risse-Kappen, Cooperation among Democracies: the European Influence on US Foreign Policy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stanley Sloan, NATO, the European Union, and the Transatlantic Community: the Transatlantic Bargain Reconsidered (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Michael Quinlan, European Defence Cooperation: Asset or Threat to NATO? (Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 2001): 22.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stuart Croft, ‘The EU, NATO, and Europeanisation: the Return of Architectural Debate’, European Security, 9 (2000): 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Philip Gordon, ‘Europe’s Uncommon Foreign Policy’, International Security, 11 (1998): 35.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Anand Menon, France, NATO, and the Limits of Independence: the Politics of Ambivalence (London: Macmillan, 2000).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Michael Brenner, Europe’s New Security Vocation (Washington: National Defense University, 2002);

    Google Scholar 

  21. Robert Hunter and Donna Farley, The European Security and Defence Policy: NATO’s Companion or Competitor? (Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2002); Howorth and Keeler (eds), Defending Europe: the EU, NATO, and the Quest for European Autonomy.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ronald Asmus, Opening NATO’s Door: How the Alliance Remade itself for a New Era (New York: Columbia University Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Philip Gordon, ‘NATO after 11 September’, Survival, 43 (2002): 89–106;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jolyon Howorth, ‘France, Britain, and the Euro-Atlantic Crisis’, Survival, 45 (2003): 173–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Anthony Forster and William Wallace, ‘What is NATO For?’, Survival, 43 (2004): 107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Julian Lindley-French, Terms of Engagement: the Paradox of American Power and the Transatlantic Dilemma Post-11 September, Chaillot Papers 52 (Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies, 2002), 41.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Michael Clarke and Paul Cornish, ‘The European Defence Project and the Prague Summit’, International Affairs, 78 (2002): 777–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Barry Posen, ‘ESDP and the Structure of World Power’, The International Spectator, XXXIX (2004): 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. John Bryson, ‘European Security and Defence Policy: What’s In It for Canada?’, in NATO and European Security: Alliance Politics from the End of the Cold War to the Age of Terrorism, eds Alex Moens et al. (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003), 83–107.

    Google Scholar 

  30. David G. Haglund, The North Atlantic Triangle Revisited: Canadian Grand Strategy at Century’s End (Toronto: Irwin, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stéphane Roussel, The North American Democratic Peace: Absence of War and Security Institution-building in Canada-US Relations, 1867–1958 (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  32. David B. Dewitt and Jeffrey P. Plante, ‘National Defence vs Foreign Affairs: Culture Clash in Canada’s International Security Policy?’, International Journal, 59 (2004): 579–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Frédéric Mérand, ‘Les nouvelles relations transatlantiques en matière de défense: quel rôle pour le Canada?’, Canadian Foreign Policy, 12 (2005): 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Alexandra Gheciu, ‘Security Institutions as Agents of Socialization? NATO and the New Europe’, International Organization, 59 (2005): 973–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2007 Frédéric Mérand

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mérand, F. (2007). Strategic Partners, Different Strategies: the United States and Canada in the Transatlantic Security Community. In: Gänzle, S., Sens, A.G. (eds) The Changing Politics of European Security. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230801349_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics