Abstract
Traditionally, the Conservative Party has been represented as possessing a negative attitude on the question of women’s suffrage, with a few exceptions. But the reality is far more complicated, for the party’s attitude on the question was decidedly ambivalent. While it is undoubtedly true that the vast majority of diehards opposed to enfranchising women were Tories, the party contained many ardent supporters and played a major role in its achievement. They were the first party to organise large numbers of women for political work through the Primrose League, an affiliated organisation, and depended on them during campaigns. Thanks to the Primrose League, the Conservatives possessed the largest body of politicised women in the nation. Furthermore, a significant proportion of both male and female Conservatives were actively engaged in the suffrage movement. The party’s leaders, from Disraeli on, had spoken in favour of at least limited female enfranchisement at one time or another — although, it must be admitted, until 1918, none of them did anything about it. Most importantly, it was a coalition government, to which the Conservatives belonged, that voted the Representation of the People Act of 1918 giving most women over the age of 30 the right to vote, and a purely Conservative government that, in 1928, enfranchised women on the same terms as men. In spite of the existence of a significant anti-suffrage rearguard, the party made numerous, very positive contributions to the ‘Cause’.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See, for example, M. Pugh, The March of the Women (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), p. 102.
Barbara Caine, Victorian Feminists (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992), p. 86.
Lady Knightley, letter to The Times, 9 November 1908, p. 16.
quoted in P. Jalland, Women, Marriage and Politics (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986), p. 219.
See D. Morgan, Suffragists and Liberals: the Politics of Woman Suffrage in Britain (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975), p. 34.
D. Rubinstein, A Different World for Women: the Life of Millicent Garrett Fawcett (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991), p. 183.
in Austen Chamberlain, Politics from Inside: an Epistolary Chronicle 1906–1914 (London: Cassell, 1936), p. 169.
Quoted in M. Pugh, The Tories and the People (Oxford: Blackwell, 1985), p. 57.
The data comes from B. Harrison, Separate Spheres: the Opposition to Women’s Suffrage in Britain (London, 1978), pp. 28–9.
and G. E. Maguire, Conservative Women: a History of Women and the Conservative Party (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1998), p. 62.
Entry for 19 January 1913 in John Ramsden (ed.), Real Old Tory Politics: the Political Diaries of Sir Robert Sandars, Lord Bayford, 1910–1935 (London: Historians’ Press, 1984), p. 59.
Lady Salisbury to Lady Frances Balfour, 11 February 1897 in Lady Frances Balfour, Ne Obliviscaris: Dinna Forget (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1930), vol. 2, p. 48.
John Ramsden, The Age of Balfour and Baldwin (London: Longman, 1975), p. 120.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Lori Maguire
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maguire, L. (2007). The Conservative Party and Women’s Suffrage. In: Boussahba-Bravard, M. (eds) Suffrage Outside Suffragism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230801318_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230801318_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-54491-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-80131-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)