Skip to main content

Asymmetries as Sources of Conflict in a Monetary Union

  • Chapter
Advances in Monetary Policy and Macroeconomics

Abstract

In the long run the replacement of national notes and coins by the euro is expected to benefit national economies. Such benefits will be materialized by reducing uncertainty on interest rates and exchange rates, providing a stable exchange for trade and financial transactions, lessening red tape in financial intermediation, minimizing transaction costs, promoting trade and establishing a strong currency whose stability will be safeguarded by the European Central Bank (ECB). It is argued that in the near future the euro will also allow better access to markets within and outside the EMU for enterprises, thereby raising their competitiveness, while, on the other hand, this process will promote benefits such as price transparency for EMU consumers. Pro-EMU professional economists, politicians and policy makers also argue that the euro will bring higher growth rates, which will help to reduce unemployment (European Economy, 1990; Emerson et al., 1992; Gros and Thygesen, 1992).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abowd, J., F. Kramarz, T. Lemieux and D. Margolis (1997) ‘Minimum Wages and Youth Unemployment in France and the United States’, NBER Working Paper, No. 6111.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., R. Perotti and E. Spolaore (1995) ‘The Political Economy of Fiscal Discipline. Together or Separately? Issues on the Costs and Benefits of Political and Fiscal Unions’, European Economic Review, 39, 751–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., E. Spolaore and R. Wacziarg (1997) ‘Economic Integration and Political Disintegration’, NBER Working Paper No. 6163, September.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arestis, P., K. McCauley and M. Sawyer (2001) ‘The Future of the Euro’, Public Policy Brief, 63, Levy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arghyrou, M. and G. Chortareas (2006) ‘Real Exchange Rates and Current Account Imbalances in the Euro Area’, Paper presented at the Eastern Economic Association Meetings, 25–7 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aschauer, A. (1998) ‘How Should the Surplus be Spent?’, Levy Institute Policy Note no. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. and G. Cain (1997) ‘Shifts in US Relative Wages: The Role of Trade, Technology and Factor Endowments,’ CEPR Discussion Paper Series no. 1596.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bauldrin, M. and F. Canova (2000) ‘Inequality and Convergence in Europe’s Regions: Reconsidering European Regional Policies’, Economic Policy, 207–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayoumi, T. and B. Eichengreen (1992a) ‘Shocking Aspects of EMU’, CEPR Discussion Paper Series No. 643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayoumi, T. and B. Eichengreen (1992b) ‘Is There a Conflict Between EC Enlargement and EMU?’, CEPR Discussion Paper Series No. 646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayoumi, T. and B. Eichengreen (1994a) ‘Restraining Yourself: Fiscal Rules and Stabilization’, CEPR Discussion Paper Series No. 1029.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayoumi, T. and B. Eichengreen (1994b) ‘One Money or Many? Analyzing the Prospects for Monetary Unification in Various Parts of the World’, Princeton Studies in International Finance No. 76, September, Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayoumi, T. and P. Masson (1995) ‘Fiscal Flows in the United States and Canada: Lessons for Monetary Union in Europe’, European Economic Review 39, 751–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bean, C. (1994) ‘European Unemployment: A Survey’, Journal of Economic Literature, 32 (2), 573–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B.S. (2006) ‘Testimony of Chairman Ben S. Bernanke’, Semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress, Before the Committee on Financial Services, US House of Representatives February 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O.J. and F. Giavazzi (2002) ‘Current Account Deficits in the Euro Area: The End of the Feldtsein-Horioka Puzzle?’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 147–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O. (2000) ‘The Economics of Unemployment. Shocks, Institutions and Interactions’, Lionel Robbins Lectures, London School of Economics, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O. and J. Wolfers (1999) ‘The Role of Shocks and Institutions in the Rise of European Unemployment: The Aggregate Evidence’, obtainable from www.mit.edu/blanchar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bordo, M. and L. Jonung (1999) ‘The Future of EMU: What Does the History of Monetary Union Tell Us?’, NBER Working Paper Series, No.7365, September.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D., T. Lefranc and G. Saint-Paul (1997) ‘French Unemployment: Why France and the USA are Alike’, Economic Policy, 25, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. (1997) ‘Is the European Currency Worth It?’, Challenge: The Magazine of Economic Affairs, May–June.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Grauwe, P. (2000) European Monetary Union, 4th edn. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Grauwe, P. (2001) ‘European Monetary Union: A Project of Promise and Risk’, paper presented at the conference From the Athenian Tetradrachm to the Euro, Athens, 8–9 October, organized by The National Bank of Greece and The Association of European Banking History.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, R. (2001) ‘Europe Will Tighten More’, Challenge: The Magazine of Economic Affairs, 44 (2), 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen, B. (1990) ‘One Money for Europe? Lessons from the US Currency Union’, Economic Policy, 10, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen, B. (1992) ‘Should the Maastricht Treaty Be Saved?’, Princeton Studies in International Finance No. 74, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen, B. (1993) ‘EMU’, Journal of Economic Literature, 31, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen, B. (1997) European Monetary Unification: Theory, Practice and Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, M. et al. (1992) One Market, One Money. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Economy (1990) One Market, One Money, 44. Brussels: EEC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2001) EC Economic Data Pocket Book, 5. Brussels: EU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat Yearbook (2001) various tables.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M. (1997) ‘The Political Economy of the European and Monetary Union: Political Sources of an Economic Liability’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11 (4), 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, J. (1998) ‘The Euro: Who Wins? Who Loses?’, Foreign Policy, 112, 24–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gros, D. and N. Thygesen (1992) European Monetary Integration. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (1982) MITI and the Japanese Miracle. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenen, P. (1969) ‘The Theory of Optimum Currency Areas: An Eclectic View’, in R. Mundell and A. Swoboda (eds), Monetary Problems of the International Economy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. (2000) ‘From Bismark to Maastricht: The March to European Union and the Labor Compact’, NBER Working Paper No. 7456, January.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. and M. Obstfeld (1994) International Economics: Theory and Policy. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, R. (1994) ‘Trade, Multinationals and Labor’, NBER Working Paper no. 4836.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon, R. (1963) ‘Optimum Currency Areas’, American Economic Review, 53 (3–5), 717–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon, R. (1994) ‘Discussion’, in P. Kenen, F. Papadia and F. Saccomani (eds), The International Monetary System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon, R. (2000) ‘Mundell, the Euro, and Optimum Currency Areas’. Manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundell, R. (1961) ‘A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas’, American Economic Review, 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicoletti, S. and R. Boyland (1999) ‘Summary Indicators of Product Market Regulation with an Extension to Employment Legislation’, Working Paper No. 226, Economics Department. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2000) Economic Outlook, 68, December. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001) OECD Surveys: Greece 2001, February. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld, M. (1997) ‘Europe’s Gamble’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 241–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld, M. (2000) ‘Diversity Still an Option’, in IMF Economic Forum, IMF Survey, 11 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld, M. and G. Peri (1998) ‘Regional Nonadjustment and Fiscal Policy’, NBER Working Paper No. 6431, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelagidis, T. (1998a) ‘Divergent Real Economies in Europe’, Economy and Society, 26 (4), 546–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelagidis, T. (1998b) ‘European Unemployment: Myths and Realities’, Challenge: The Magazine of Economic Affairs, 41 (4), 76–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelagidis, T. (1999) ‘A Reply to Robert Solomon’, Challenge: The Magazine of Economic Affairs, 42 (1), 126–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, R. and T. Sloek (1997) ‘The Real Effects of Monetary Policy in the European Union: What Are the Differences?’, IMF Working Paper 160, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (1997) Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. and C. Engel (2000) ‘Currency Unions and International Integration’, NBER Working Paper No. 7872, September.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • SOPEMI (1998) Trends in International Migration, Annual Report. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala-i-Martin, X. and J. Sachs (1991) ‘Fiscal Federalism and Optimum Currency Areas: Evidence for Europe from United States’, NBER Working Paper No. 3855, October.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A. (1995) North-South Trade, Employment and Inequality: Fortunes in a Skill-Driven World. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1997) World Development Report 1997. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wyplosz, C. (1997) ‘Notes on Unemployment in Europe’. Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Philip Arestis Gennaro Zezza

Copyright information

© 2007 Philip Arestis, Georgios Chortareas and Theodore Pelagidis

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arestis, P., Chortareas, G., Pelagidis, T. (2007). Asymmetries as Sources of Conflict in a Monetary Union. In: Arestis, P., Zezza, G. (eds) Advances in Monetary Policy and Macroeconomics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230800762_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics