Skip to main content

Against Exceptionalism: British Interests for Selectively Europeanizing its Immigration Policy

  • Chapter
The Europeanization of National Policies and Politics of Immigration

Part of the book series: Migration, Minorities and Citizenship ((MMC))

  • 164 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides an analysis of the extent of Europeanization of the policies and politics of immigration in the United Kingdom (UK). In its relationship with the European Union (EU), the UK is often characterized as the odd one out and in comparison to other European member states the British approach towards immigration is considered unique. In contrast to this general assumption of ‘Anglo-Saxon exceptionalism’ we argue that the British case is in fact only a variant of the general pattern of the Europeanization of immigration policies and does not constitute a fundamentally different case. On the one hand the analysis shows that Britain is exceptional in the extent of its Europeanization, which is at the lowest level compared to other member states of the EU. With respect to the pattern of Europeanization we argue that the European impact on British policies of immigration is highly selective and that the government defends important features of its established politics of immigration. On the other hand, the UK is similar to other leading European member states insofar as it regularly makes use of the European level as a venue to pursue its national interests on immigration policy. Generally, the differences between the UK and other member states concerning the pattern of Europeanization are therefore a result of varying national interests. In particular, three main factors can account for the British case: (1) the mode of Europeanization structuring the British interaction with the EU in this policy area; (2) the increasing difficulties experienced by the UK in regulating migration flows in the national setting; and (3) the particular national preferences of the British government.

The authors would like to thank Thomas Faist, Margit Fauser and Andrew Geddes as well as all other participants in the conference ‘The Euro-peanization of National Immigration Policies. Varying Developments across Nations and Policy Areas’ (Europäische Akademie Berlin, 1–3 September 2005) for their helpful comments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, D. (2005) ‘The United Kingdom: a Europeanized Government in a Non-Europeanized Polity’. In S. Bulmer and C. Lequesne (eds), The Member States of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbou des Places, S. and H. Oger (2005) ‘Making the European Migration Regime: Decoding Member States’ Legal Strategies’. European Journal of Migration and Law, Vol. 6: 353–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. A. (2002) ‘Pace-Setting, Foot-Dragging, and Fence-Sitting: Member State Responses to Europeanization’. Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 40, No. 2: 193–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, S. and M. Burch (1998) ‘Organizing for Europe: the British State and the European Union’. Public Administration, Vol. 76, No. 4: 601–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, S. and M. Burch (2004) ‘The Europeanization of UK Government: From Quiet Revolution to Explicit Step-change?’ Paper presented at the ESRC/UACES conference on ‘Britain in Europe and Europe in Britain: the Europeanisation of British Politics?’ Sheffield Town Hall, 16 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, S. and G. Kosack (1985) Immigrant Workers and Class Structure in Western Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cholewinski, R. (2004) ‘EU Measures Preventing Irregular Migration and UK Participation’. Tolley’s Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Law Journal, Vol. 18, No. 2: 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currle, E. (2004) Migration in Europa — Daten und Hintergründe. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbrass, J. (2004) ‘The Europeanisation of Interest Representation: UK Business and Environmental Interests Compared’. Paper presented at the ESRC/UACES conference on ‘Britain in Europe and Europe in Britain: the Europeanisation of British Politics?’ Sheffield Town Hall, 16 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flinders, M. (2001) ‘Mechanisms of Judicial Accountability in British Central Government’. Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 54: 54–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flinders, M. (2005) ‘Majoritarian Democracy in Britain: New Labour and the Constitution’. West European Politics, Vol. 28, No. 1: 61–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, G. (1979) Immigrant Labor and Racial Conflict in Industrial Societies: the French and British Experience, 1945–1975. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, G. (1994) ‘Commentary’. In W. Cornelius, P. Martin and J. F. Hollifield (eds), Controlling Immigration: a Global Perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, G. (2004) ‘Commentary’. In W. A. Cornelius, T. Tsuda, P. L. Martin and J. F. Hollifield (eds), Controlling Immigration: a Global Perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, A. (2000) Immigration and European Integration. Towards Fortress Europe? Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, A. (2003) The Politics of Migration and Immigration in Europe. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, A. (2004) The European Union and British Politics. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, A. and V. Guiraudon (2004) ‘Britain, France, and EU Anti-Discrimination Policy: the Emergence of an EU Policy Paradigm’. West European Politics, Vol. 27, No. 2: 334–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, S. (1992) Britain and the European Community: the Politics of Semi-Detachment. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, S. (1998) An Awkward Partner. Britain in the European Community, 3d edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeßner, G.-J. (2005) ‘Großbritannien: Ein europäischer Sonderweg in der Politik innerer Sicherheit’. In G.-J. Glaeßner and A. Lorenz (eds), Europäisierung der inneren Sicherheit. Eine vergleichende Untersuchung am Beispiel von organisierter Kriminalität und Terrorismus. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, E. and P. Statham (2005) ‘Becoming European? British Pro-Migrant NGOs and the European Union’. European Political Communication Working Paper Series (9/05).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guild, E. (2004) ‘Transposing the EU Acquis on Immigration and Asylum in the UK: an Introduction’. Tolley’s Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Law Journal, Vol. 18, No. 2: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiraudon, V. (2001) ‘Seeking New Venues: the Europeanization of Migration-Related Policies’. Swiss Political Science Review, Vol. 7, No. 3: 99–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hailbronner, K. (1999) ‘The Treaty of Amsterdam and Migration Law’. European Journal of Migration and Law, Vol. 1, No. 1: 9–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, R. (2000) Citizenship and Immigration in Post-war Britain. The Institutional Origins of a Multicultural Nation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, R. (2004) ‘Commentary’. In W. A. Cornelius, T. Tsuda, P. L. Martin and J. F. Hollifield (eds), Controlling Immigration: a Global Perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (2005) ‘Explanatory Memorandum to the Asylum Support (Amendment) Regulations 2005, No. 11’. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons European Standing Committee B (2002) Reception of Asylum Applicants 17 June 2002. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Select Committee on European Scrutiny (2000a) Lists of Third Countries whose Nationals Require Visas and those whose Nationals Are Visa-exempt, Fourteenth Report. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Select Committee on European Scrutiny (2000b) The Right to Family Reunification, Eighteenth Report. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Select Committee on European Scrutiny (2001) Reception of Asylum Applicants in Member States, First Report. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Select Committee on European Scrutiny (2002a) A Common Policy on Illegal Migration, Eighteenth Report. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Select Committee on European Scrutiny (2002b) Determining the Member State Responsible for Examining an Asylum Application, Second Report. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Select Committee on European Scrutiny (2002c) Short-term Residence Permits for Victims of Trafficking Prepared to Cooperate with the Competent Authorities, Thirty-fourth Report. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joppke, C. (1999) Immigration and the Nation-State: the United States, Germany and Great Britain. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A. (2004) ‘The Europeanization of British Environmental Policy’. Paper presented at the ESRC/UACES conference on ‘Britain in Europe and Europe in Britain: the Europeanisation of British Politics?’ Sheffield Town Hall, 16 July.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, G. and J. Richardson (1982) ‘The British Policy Style or the Logic of Negotiation?’ In J. Richardson (ed.), Policy Styles in Western Europe. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassim, H. (2000) ‘The United Kingdom’. In H. Kassim, B. G. Peters and V. Wright (eds), The National Co-ordination of EU Policy. The Domestic Level. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kassim, H. (2001) ‘Representing the United Kingdom in Brussels: the Fine Art of Positive Co-ordination’. In H. Kassim, A. Menon, B. G. Peters and V. Wright (eds), The National Co-ordination of EU Policy. The Domestic Level. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C. (2001) ‘Reforming Transport Policy in Britain: Concurrence with Europe but Separate Development’. In A. Héritier, D. Kerwer, C. Knill, D. Lehmkuhl, M. Teutsch and A.-C. Douillet (eds), Differential Europe. The European Union impact on National Policymaking. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton-Henry, Z. (1992) The Politics of immigration. Immigration, ‘Race’ and ‘Race’ Relations in Post-war Britain. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton-Henry, Z. (1994) ‘Britain: the Would-be Zero-Immigration Country’. In W. A. Cornelius, P. L. Martin and J. F. Hollifield (eds), Controlling immigration: a Global Perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton-Henry, Z. (2004) ‘Britain: From Immigration Control to Migration Management’. In W. A. Cornelius, T. Tsuda, P. L. Martin and J. F. Hollifield (eds), Controlling Immigration: a Global Perspective. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love-land, I. (2003) ‘Britain and Europe’. In V. Bogdanor (ed.), The British Constitution in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcussen, M., T. Risse, D. Engelmann-Martin, H. J. Knopf and K. Roscher (1999) ‘Constructing Europe? The Evolution of French, British and German Nation State Identities’. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 6, No. 4: 614–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, D., D. Richards and M. Smith (2001) Changing Patterns of Governance in the UK: Reinventing Whitehall? Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mastenbroek, E. (2005) ‘EU Compliance: Still a “Black Hole”?’ Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 12, No. 6: 1103–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monar, J. (2004) ‘Justice and Home Affairs’. Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 42: 117–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (1993) ‘Preferences and Power in the European Community: a Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach’. Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 31, No. 4: 473–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, E. (1998) ‘The Impact of European Legislation on British Public Policy Making: a Research Note’. Public Administration, Vol. 76, No. 4: 803–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peers, S. (2000) EU Justice and Home Affairs Law. Harlow: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, C. M. (2003) ‘The Europeanization of Public Policy’. In K. Featherstone and C. M. Radaelli (eds), The Politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T. (2001) ‘A European Identity? Europeanization and the Evolution of Nation-State Identities’. In M. Green Cowles, J. Caporaso and T. Risse (eds), Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T. (2004) ‘Social Constructivism and European Integration’. In A. Wiener and T. Diez (eds), European Integration Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, B. (2004a) ‘The European Dimension to British Border Control’. Tolley’s Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Law Journal, Vol. 18, No. 2: 6–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, B. (2004b) ‘The United Kingdom’. In K. Hailbronner and I. Higgins (eds), Migration and Asylum Law and Policy in the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönwälder, K. (2001) Einwanderung und ethnische Plutalität: Politische Entscheidungen und öffentliche Debatten in Großbritannien und der Bundesrepublik von den 1950er bis zu den 1970er Jahren. Essen: Klartext-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sifft, S. (2004) ‘The Boomerang Pattern. Pushing for the Europeanization of British Equal Opportunities Policies’. Young Scholars’ Conference ‘The Impact of Europeanization on Politics and Policy in Europe’, 7–9 May, Munk Centre for International Studies, University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. J., D. Marsh, D. and D. Richards (1995) ‘Central Government Departments and the Policy Process’. In R. A. W. Rhodes and P. Dunleavy (eds), Prime Minister, Cabinet and Core Executive. Basingstoke: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toner, H. and A. Hurwitz (2004) ‘The EU Asylum Acquis in the UK’. Tolley’s Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Law Journal, Vol. 18, No. 2: 32–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, H. (1997) ‘At Odds with Europe’. Political Studies, Vol. 45, No. 4: 677–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, H. (2005) ‘An Institutional Anatomy and Five Policy Modes’. In H. Wallace, W. Wallace and M. A. Pollack (eds), Policy-Making in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, A. (1999) ‘Forging Flexibility — the British “No” to Schengen’. European Journal of Migration and Law, Vol. 1: 441–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2007 Andreas Ette and Jürgen Gerdes

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ette, A., Gerdes, J. (2007). Against Exceptionalism: British Interests for Selectively Europeanizing its Immigration Policy. In: Faist, T., Ette, A. (eds) The Europeanization of National Policies and Politics of Immigration. Migration, Minorities and Citizenship. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230800717_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics