Advertisement

From Model to Average Student: the Europeanization of Migration Policy and Politics in Germany

  • Kathrin Prümm
  • Stefan Alscher
Chapter
Part of the Migration, Minorities and Citizenship book series (MMC)

Abstract

Germany is often regarded as the model student or Musterknabe of European integration. Even though this may have been the case for several decades, trends and patterns since the Amsterdam Treaty show a more differentiated picture between absorption on the one hand and partial reluctance on the other. While most of the European regulations are transferred into national law without any controversial debates, the German government and actors on the subnational level (Länder) have become increasingly resistant to further integration in the field of migration policy. It is important to mention that the generally small degree of misfit between European and German regulations is also linked to Germany’s role as an agenda-setter on the level of the European Union (EU).

Keywords

European Union Immigration Policy Grand Coalition Migration Policy German Government 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Auel, K. (2005) ‘Europäisierung nationaler Politik’. In H.-J. and M. L. Bieling (eds), Theorien der europäischen Integration. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 293–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bade, K. and M. Bommes (2000) ‘Migration und politische Kultur im Nicht-Einwanderungsland’. In K. Bade and R. Münz (eds), Migrationsreport 2000: Fakten, Analysen, Perspektiven. Frankfurt am Main, New York: Campus Verlag, pp. 163–204.Google Scholar
  3. Börzel, T. (2003) How the European Union Interacts with its Member States. Political Sciences Series 93, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna, http://www.ihs.ac.at/publications/pol/pw_93.pdf (last accessed 19 September 2006).Google Scholar
  4. Börzel, T. and T. Risse (2003) ‘Conceptualizing the Domestic Impact of Europe’. In K. Featherstone und C. Radaelli (eds), The Politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 55–78.Google Scholar
  5. Boswell, C. (2002) ‘EU Immigration and Asylum Policy: From Tampere to Laeken and Beyond’. Briefing Paper News Series No. 30, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, February 2002. http://www.chathamhouse.org.uk/pdf/briefing_papers/BPpercent2030.pdf (last accessed on 19 December 2005).Google Scholar
  6. Eising, R. (2003) ‘Europäisierung und Integration. Konzepte der EU-Forschung’. In M. Jachtenfuchs and B. Kohler-Koch (eds), Europäische Integration. Opladen: Leske und Budrich, pp. 387–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Freeman, G. (1998) ‘The Decline of Sovereignity: Politics and Immigration Restriction in Liberal States’. In C. Joppke (ed.), Challenge to the Nation State: Immigration in Western Europe and the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Frings, D. and Peter Knösel (eds) (2005) Das neue Ausländerrecht. Alle Gesetze und Verordnungen zum Zuwanderungsgesetz. Frankfurt am Main: Fachhochschulverlag.Google Scholar
  9. Geddes, A. (2000) Immigration and European Integration: Towards Fortress Europe? Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Geddes, A. (2003) The Politics of Migration and Immigration in Europe. London, Thousand Oaks, New Dehli: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giesler, V. and D. Wasser (1993) Das neue Asylrecht: Die neuen Gesetzestexte und internationalen Abkommen mit Erläuterungen. Cologne: Bundesanzeiger.Google Scholar
  12. Guiraudon, V. (1998) ‘International Human Rights Norms and their Incorporation: the Protection of Aliens in Europe’. European Institute/European Forum Working Paper 98/04, European University Institute, Florence.Google Scholar
  13. Guiraudon, V. (2000) ‘European Integration and Migration Policy: Vertical Policy-making as Venue Shopping’. Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 38, No. 2: 251–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hailbronner, K. (2005) Ausländer- und Asylrecht Heidelberg: C. F. Müller.Google Scholar
  15. Hellmann, G., R. Baumann, M. Bösche, B. Herborth and W. Wagner (2005) ‘De-Europeanization by Default? Germany’s EU Policy in Defense and Asylum’. Foreign Policy Analysis, Vol. 1: 143–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hollifield, J. (2000) ‘Immigration and the Politics of Rights: the French Case in Comparative Perspective’. In M. Bommes and Andrew Geddes (eds), Immigration and Welfare: Challenging the Borders of the Welfare State. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Jachtenfuchs, M. (2000) ‘Deutsche Europapolitik: Vom abstrakten zum konkreten Föderalismus’. In M. Knodt and B. Kohler-Koch (eds), Deutschland zwischen Europäisierung und Selbstbehauptung. Frankfurt am Main: Campus, pp. 85–109.Google Scholar
  18. Joppke, C. (1999) Immigration and the Nation-State: the United States, Germany and Great Britain. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Katzenstein, P. J. (2000) ‘Gezähmte Macht: Deutschland in Europa’. In M. Knodt and Beate Kohler-Koch (eds), Deutschland zwischen Europäisierung und Selbstbehauptung. Frankfurt am Main: Campus, pp. 57–84.Google Scholar
  20. Knill, C. (2005) ‘Die EU und die Mitgliedsstaaten’. In K. Holzinger et al. (eds), Die Europäische Union. Theorien und Analysekonzepte. Paderborn, Munich: Schöningh, pp. 153–80.Google Scholar
  21. Migration und Bevölkerung (2006) ‘Deutschland: Verschärfung des Ausländerrechts durch Umsetzung von EU-Richtlinien’. 1/2006 (February).Google Scholar
  22. Monar, J. (2003) ‘Justice and Home Affairs: Europeanization as a Government-Controlled Process’. In K. Dyson and K. Goetz (eds), Germany, Europe and the Politics of Constraint. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 309–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Müller, T. (2003) Die Innen- und Justizpolitik der Europäischen Union. Eine Analyse der Integrationsentwicklung. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nissen, J. (2004) Five years of EU Migration and Asylum Policymaking under the Amsterdam and Tampere Mandates. Brussels: MPG.Google Scholar
  25. Pro Asyl (2006) Mehr Abschottung, mehr Haft, weniger Integration. Pro Asyl leaflet 31.01.2006. http://www.proasyl.de/fileadmin/proasyl/fm_redakteure/Archiv/Stellungnahmen/Stellungnahme_PA_nderungsgesetz_neu.pdf (last accessed on 4 June 2006).Google Scholar
  26. Radaelli, C. M. (2003) ‘The Europeanization of Public Policy’. In K. Featherstone and C. M. Radaelli (eds), The Politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Renner, G. (2005) ‘Kampf der illegalen Einreise und dem illegalen Aufenthalt’. Migrationsrecht Net, 18 June. http://www.migrationsrecht.net./gesetzgebung-auslaenderrecht (last accessed 19 September 2006).Google Scholar
  28. Sachverständigenrat für Zuwanderung und Integration (2004) Migration und Integration — Erfahrungen natzen, neues wagen. Jahresgutachten 2004. Berlin, Nuremberg: Sachverständigenrat für Zuwanderung und Integration, Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge.Google Scholar
  29. Santel, B. and A. Weber (2000) ‘Zwischen Ausländerpolitik und Einwanderungspolitik: Migrations-und Ausländerrecht in Deutschland’. In K. J. Bade and R. Münz (eds), Migrationsreport 2000. Fakten, Analysen, Perspektiven. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag, pp. 109–40.Google Scholar
  30. Thränhardt, W.-D. (1999) ‘Germany’s Immigration Policy and Polities’. In G. Brochmann and T. Hammar (eds), Mechanisms of Immigration Control: a Comparative Analysis of European Regulation Policies. Oxford, New York: Berg, pp. 29–58.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kathrin Prümm and Stefan Alscher 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathrin Prümm
  • Stefan Alscher

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations